5-HT2 receptor binding, functional activity and selectivity in N-benzyltryptamines

Article abstract of DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209804

The last fifteen years have seen the emergence and overflow into the drug scene of “superpotent” N-benzylated phenethylamines belonging to the “NBOMe” series, accompanied by numerous research articles. Although N-benzyl substitution of 5-methoxytryptamine is known to increase its affinity and potency at 5-HT₂ receptors associated with psychedelic activity, N-benzylated tryptamines have been studied much less than their phenethylamine analogs. To further our knowledge of the activity of N-benzyltryptamines, we have synthesized a family of tryptamine derivatives and, for comparison, a few 5-methoxytryptamine analogs with many different substitution patterns on the benzyl moiety, and subjected them to in vitro affinity and functional activity assays vs. the human 5-HT₂ receptor subtypes. In the binding (radioligand displacement) studies some of these compounds exhibited only modest selectivity for either 5-HT_2A or 5-HT_2C receptors suggesting that a few of them, with affinities in the 10–100 nanomolar range for 5-HT_2A receptors, might presumably be psychedelic. Unexpectedly, their functional (calcium mobilization) assays reflected very different trends. All of these compounds proved to be 5-HT_2C receptor full agonists while most of them showed low efficacy at the 5-HT_2A subtype. Furthermore, several showed moderate-to-strong preferences for activation of the 5-HT_2C subtype at nanomolar concentrations. Thus, although some N-benzyltryptamines might be abuse-liable, others might represent new leads for the development of therapeutics for weight loss, erectile dysfunction, drug abuse, or schizophrenia.

Full text of DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209804

RESEARCH ARTICLE
5-HT2 receptor binding, functional activity and
selectivity in N-benzyltryptamines
1
Miguel Toro-Sazo , Jose Brea , Marıa I. Loza , Marta Cimadevila , Bruce K. Cassels
2
2
2
1
ID
´
´
*
˜
1 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Nuñoa, Santiago, Chile, 2 BioFarma
Research Group, CIMUS, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
* bcassels@uchile.cl
Abstract
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
The last fifteen years have seen the emergence and overflow into the drug scene of “super-
potent” N-benzylated phenethylamines belonging to the “NBOMe” series, accompanied by
numerous research articles. Although N-benzyl substitution of 5-methoxytryptamine is
known to increase its affinity and potency at 5-HT2 receptors associated with psychedelic
activity, N-benzylated tryptamines have been studied much less than their phenethylamine
analogs. To further our knowledge of the activity of N-benzyltryptamines, we have synthe-
sized a family of tryptamine derivatives and, for comparison, a few 5-methoxytryptamine
analogs with many different substitution patterns on the benzyl moiety, and subjected them
to in vitro affinity and functional activity assays vs. the human 5-HT2 receptor subtypes. In
the binding (radioligand displacement) studies some of these compounds exhibited only
modest selectivity for either 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors suggesting that a few of them, with
affinities in the 10–100 nanomolar range for 5-HT2A receptors, might presumably be psyche-
delic. Unexpectedly, their functional (calcium mobilization) assays reflected very different
trends. All of these compounds proved to be 5-HT2C receptor full agonists while most of
them showed low efficacy at the 5-HT2A subtype. Furthermore, several showed moderate-
to-strong preferences for activation of the 5-HT2C subtype at nanomolar concentrations.
Thus, although some N-benzyltryptamines might be abuse-liable, others might represent
new leads for the development of therapeutics for weight loss, erectile dysfunction, drug
abuse, or schizophrenia.
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Toro-Sazo M, Brea J, Loza MI, Cimadevila
M, Cassels BK (2019) 5-HT2 receptor binding,
functional activity and selectivity in N-
benzyltryptamines. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0209804.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804
Editor: James Porter, University of North Dakota,
UNITED STATES
Received: October 24, 2018
Accepted: December 11, 2018
Published: January 10, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Toro-Sazo et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
Introduction
within the paper.
Serotonin or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is a bioactive compound present in a large variety
of plants and animals. In mammals it is an autacoid or mediator of important functions in the
gut and in blood platelets where it is most abundant, but in spite of its relative scarcity in the
central nervous system its most widely known functions are as a neurotransmitter. The discov-
ery of increasingly selective 5-HT receptor inhibitors has shown that serotonin is not only
involved in important peripheral functions, but is also implicated in cognition, memory, emo-
tion, the regulation of mood, the sleep-wake cycle, food intake, sexual activity, and in migraine,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia and hallucinations [1]. Serotonin activates a
Funding: This work was supported by FONDECYT
(Chile) regular research grants 1110146 and
1150868 to BKC and CONICYT doctoral grant
21140358 to MT-S. The funders had no role in
study design, data collection and analysis, decision
to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
1 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
large number of receptor subtypes (14 to date). With the exception of the 5-HT3 receptor
which is a ligand-gated ion channel, serotonin receptors couple to G proteins, and are thus
related to the release of second messengers such as cyclic adenosine, inositol phosphate(s) and
arachidonic acid. However, signaling via β-arrestin recruitment is an important alternative sig-
naling route that may be involved in different pharmacological outcomes [2].
The 5-HT2 receptors form a close-knit trio of Gq/11 protein-coupled subtypes, with 5-HT2A
and 5-HT2C showing somewhat greater sequence identity than the 5-HT2B subtype but still
with more than 50% overall sequence similarities [3]. The 5-HT2A subtype is of particular rele-
vance to schizophrenia and hallucination, and also seems to be involved in cognition, emotion,
etc. The action of modern antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine and risperidone have a major
5-HT2A antagonist component. In contrast, many full or partial 5-HT2A agonists are well
known hallucinogens, and classic psychedelics are believed to act primarily as 5-HT2A receptor
agonists [4,5]. Although the 5-HT2B receptor is expressed in the central nervous system and
drugs affecting its activity might be of therapeutic interest, it is now generally considered an
antitarget due to the serious cardiovascular effects associated with its activation [6]. Finally,
5-HT2C receptor agonists have attracted attention over the last decade as appetite suppressants
and as possible agents for the treatment of drug abuse, erectile dysfunction, and schizophrenia
[7–9]. Very recently, positive modulators have been identified as an alternative for increasing
5-HT2C receptor signaling [10]. While a good number of 5-HT2 receptor subtype-selective
antagonists have been identified, selective agonists are relatively rare and constitute an active
field of research.
The investigation more than two decades ago of two series of N-benzyl and N-(4-substi-
tuted)benzyl derivatives of the psychedelic 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B)
and 5-methoxytryptamine suggested that these modifications induced mostly insignificant
changes in 5-HT2A receptor binding. Significant losses in affinity were observed with the
5-HT2C receptor, leading to slight preferences for the 5-HT2A subtype (in only some cases up
to 10-fold or little more) [11]. In contrast, the finding that N-benzylation caused a 4 to 5-fold
increase in potency of the weak partial agonist 3-aminoethyl-2,4-(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione at
5-HT2A receptors, and that this effect was more marked with 2-methoxybenzyl substitution,
led to the synthesis of a small set of tryptamine and phenethylamine derivatives [12–19], result-
ing in the discovery of the now notorious NBOMe drugs. A search in PubMed for the item
“nbome” showed that at most two articles were published each year before 2010, the rate of
publication rose to 25 by 2015, fell somewhat the next year, and then reached 32 in 2017, and
15 until mid-2018. Extensive structure-activity studies showed that most of the “superpotent”
N-benzylated 2,5-dimethoxy-4-X-phenethylamines had negligible selectivity between 5-HT2A
and 5-HT2C receptors [13,16–20]. This led to a quest for more 5-HT2A-selective agonists,
which was successful in very few cases [15,16].
The older literature records limited exploration of N-benzyl and N-4-substituted benzyl-
5-methoxytryptamines [11], and doctoral theses addressing N-2-hydroxy- or–methoxybenzyl
derivatives of tryptamine and 5-methoxytryptamine [12,14,21]. The only recent, systematic
study, is the paper by Nichols [19] showing for the first time that introduction of a meta-meth-
oxyl, methylthio or methyl group, or a chlorine, bromine or iodine atom on the benzyl substit-
uent, is equally effective in raising 5-HT2A receptor affinities to low nanomolar Ki values, while
ortho-methoxy or -bromo substitution are somewhat less favorable. Also, both agonist and
antagonist radioligand displacement from the 5-HT2A receptor is usually favored minimally
(by a factor of 2 to 4) over the 5-HT2C subtype. In vitro (Ca2+ mobilization) functional assays
showed that almost all these compounds are high efficacy partial to full agonists at both recep-
tor subtypes, in most cases with a tenfold or greater preference for the 5-HT2A receptor, and
up to 40-fold for the 3-iodobenzyl derivative.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
2 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
The literature records only three N-benzylated tryptamine derivatives lacking the 5-meth-
oxy substituent, comparing them with the corresponding 5-methoxytryptamines in a rat tail
artery assay [12,14]. These compounds were partial agonists at the 5-HT2A receptor, and were
2–4 times less potent than the 5-methoxy analogs, results that might be reasonably attributed
to the absence of a hydrogen bond accepting methoxyl group on the indole moiety. It should
be pointed out that the orthosteric binding site of 5-HT2 receptors contains serine, threonine
and tyrosine residues that form hydrogen bonds with agonist and antagonist ligands [22,23]. It
could be further conjectured that N-benzylated compounds with less interactions in the
5-HT2A receptor’s orthosteric site might more clearly reveal effects due to unmapped interac-
tions in the extended binding site described for the highly homologous 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C
receptor crystal structures [22–24]. In fact Halberstadt [25], citing Braden et al. [13], points
out that “compounds having low-to-moderate affinity tend to be the most sensitive to the (N-
benzyl) substitution”. We therefore decided to use tryptamine instead of its 5-methoxy deriva-
tive as the starting point for the synthesis and evaluation of a more extensive series of N-benzyl
compounds. Nevertheless, we also prepared and assayed a small number of 5-methoxytrypta-
mine derivatives for comparison of our data with the literature, and to see if this substitution
on the indole ring is responsible for any consistent changes in affinity or potency (Fig 1).
For specific substitution patterns, see Tables 1 and 2.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
All the compounds (thirty-six N-benzylated tryptamine derivatives and seven N-benzylated
5-methoxytryptamine derivatives, four of the latter described previously [11,19], were synthe-
sized by treating appropriate benzaldehydes with tryptamine or 5-methoxytryptamine (free
base) in methanol and reducing the unisolated imine intermediate with sodium borohydride,
as described for phenethylamines and 5-methoxytryptamines and shown in Fig 2 [16,19,26]:
The secondary amines thus obtained in good yields, and not requiring extensive purifica-
tion, were used as their water-soluble salts (usually hydrochlorides) in receptor binding and
functional pharmacological studies.
It is worth noting that the 1H NMR spectra (in DMSO-d6) of some salts with an ortho-
hydroxyl group on the N-benzyl moiety indicate the presence of an intramolecular hydrogen
bond between the protonated amine and the hydroxyl group (Fig 3).
Fig 1. General structure and numbering of the N-benzyltryptamines. R5 = H, tryptamines; R5 = MeO,
5-methoxytryptamines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g001
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
3 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Table 1. Human 5-HT2 receptor subtype binding affinities (pKi SEM, and Ki in parentheses) and 5-HT2A/2C and (in parentheses) 5-HT2C/2A selectivities of seroto-
nin, tryptamine, and the synthesized compounds.
Compound
R5
RX
RY
5-HT2A
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
5-HT2B
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
5-HT2C
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
Selectivity
5-HT2A/2C
(5-HT2C/2A
)
5-HT
OH
H
6.03
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Tryptamine
5.39 0.25
(4073.80)
6.96 0.06
(109.65)
7.02 0.08
(95.50)
0.021
(46.7)
1
2
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
6.61 0.11
(245.47)
7.00 0.06
(100)
6.73 0.06
(186.21)
0.75
(1.33)
2-OH
2-OMe
2-Me
2-Cl
6.94 0.20
(114.82)
7.17 0.05
(67.61)
7.07 0.10
(85.11)
0.73
(1.37)
3
H
7.05 0.14
(89.13)
48 1�
7.33 0.11
(46.77)
6.65 0.11
(223.87)
2.56
(0.39)
4
H
6.47 0.07
(338.84)
6.18 0.05
(660.69)
N.D.
5
H
7.92 0.12
(12.02)
7.63 0.04
(23.44)
7.61 0.03
(24.55)
2.04
(0.49)
6
2-Br
H
6.71 0.08
(194.98)
7.13 0.07
(74.13)
6.47 0.12
(338.84)
1.74
(0.57)
7
3-OH
3-Me
3-F
H
7.12 0.07
(75.86)
7.43 0.07
(37.15)
7.59 0.06
(25.70)
0.36
(2.8)
8
H
7.84 0.06
(14.45)
7.77 0.03
(16.98)
7.13 0.03
(74.13)
5.10
(0.20)
9
H
6.59 0.08
(257.04)
6.90 0.05
(125.89)
6.67 0.06
(213.80)
0.84
(1.19)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3-Cl
H
7.35 0.07
(44.67)
7.46 0.06
(34.67)
7.01 0.08
(97.72)
2.17
(0.46)
3-Br
H
8.09 0.14
(8.13)
7.66 0.07
(21.88)
7.12 0.07
(75.86)
8
(0.13)
4-OH
4-OMe
4-Me
4-OEt
4-Cl
H
6.04 0.12
(912.01)
6.31 0.08
(489.78)
6.00 0.08
(1000)
1.09
(0.92)
H
6.34 0.10
(457.09)
7.16 0.10
(69.18)
6.45 0.08
(354.81)
0.78
(1.28)
H
6.38 0.08
(416.87)
7.13 0.04
(74.13)
6.48 0.04
(331.13)
0.81
(1.23)
H
6.56 0.09
(275.42)
6.57 0.06
(269.15)
6.13 0.11
(741.31)
2.66
(0.36)
H
6.15 0.10
(707.95)
6.65 0.14
(223.87)
6.02 0.08
(954.99)
1.37
(0.73)
4-Br
H
6.00 0.06
(1000)
6.58 0.09
(263.03)
5.97 0.08
(1071.52)
1.09
(0.92)
4-NO2
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OH
2-OH
2-OH
H
5.58 0.07
(2630.27)
6.70 0.11
(199.53)
5.85 0.11
(1412.54)
0.54
(1.85)
3-OMe
3-OMe
3-Br
3-F
5-Me
5-F
7.58 0.06
(26.30)
7.88 0.06
(13.18)
7.78 0.06
(16.60)
0.58
(1.72)
5.82 0.16
(1513.56)
6.71 0.03
(194.98)
5.95 0.07
(1122.02)
0.73
(1.37)
7.85 0.05
(14.13)
7.81 0.07
(15.49)
6.86 0.08
(138.04)
9.8
(0.10)
6.68 0.05
(208.93)
6.89 0.04
(128.82)
6.75 0.07
(177.83)
0.82
(1.22)
6.13 0.06
(741.31)
6.81 0.04
(154.88)
6.57 0.08
(269.15)
0.36
(2.77)
6.12 0.04
(758.58)
7.11 0.07
(77.62)
6.98 0.07
(104.71)
0.14
(7.15)
(Continued)
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
4 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Table 1. (Continued)
Compound
R5
RX
RY
5-HT2A
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
5-HT2B
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
5-HT2C
pKi S.E.M.
(Ki)
Selectivity
5-HT2A/2C
(5-HT2C/2A
)
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
H
H
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OMe
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OH
2-OH
3-OMe
H
5-F
5-Br
5-Br
5-Cl
5-OMe
5-NO2
4-Br
4-OMe
6-Br
6-F
6.44 0.08
(363.08)
7.02 0.07
(95.50)
6.82 0.14
(151.36)
0.42
(2.40)
6.51 0.09
(309.03)
N.D.
6.14 0.06
(724.44)
2.39
(0.42)
H
5.95 0.09
(1122.02)
7.04 0.05
(91.20)
6.87 0.09
(134.90)
0.12
(8.22)
H
6.01 0.09
(977.24)
6.10 0.06
(794.33)
5.88 0.06
(1318.26)
1.35
(0.74)
H
6.48 0.09
(331.13)
7.24 0.04
(57.54)
7.06 0.06
(87.10)
31 4�
0.26
(3.85)
H
8
4�
6.05
(891.25)
N.D.
H
5.81 0.10
(1548.82)
6.96 0.04
(109.65)
6.22 0.05
(602.56)
0.38
(2.63)
H
6.18 0.09
(660.69)
6.63 0.04
(234.42)
6.57 0.09
(269.15)
0.41
(2.44)
H
5.78 0.05
(1659.59)
7.16 0.02
(69.18)
6.95 0.09
(112.20)
0.067
(15)
H
6.64 0.06
(229.09)
12 4�
6.94 0.04
(114.82)
6.81 0.08
(154.88)
26 4�
0.95
(1.05)
H
3,5-diBr
4-OMe
H
5.22
(6025.60)
N.D.
H
5.89 0.10
(1288.25)
6.54 0.07
(288.40)
5.92 0.11
(1202.26)
0.92
(1.09)
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
7.48 0.07
(33.11)
7.78 0.11
(16.60)
7.02 0.05
(95.50)
2.93
(0.34)
2-OMe
2-Cl
H
7.35 0.05
(44.67)
7.80 0.06
(15.85)
7.16 0.07
(69.18)
1.55
(0.65)
H
7.87 0.06
(13.49)
7.43 0.09
(37.15)
7.13 0.08
(74.13)
5.51
(0.18)
2-Br
H
7.91 0.09
(12.30)
7.54 0.05
(28.84)
7.15 0.07
(70.79)
5.66
(0.18)
4-Br
H
6.41 0.04
(389.05)
6.81 0.07
(154.88)
6.42 0.04
(380.19)
0.98
(1.02)
2-OH
2-OH
5-OMe
5-F
6.87 0.04
(134.90)
7.69 0.05
(20.42)
7.39 0.07
(40.74)
0.30
(3.31)
8.40 0.16
(3.98)
8.05 0.07
(8.91)
7.40 0.09
(39.81)
9.66
(0.10)
�Binding inhibition at 10 μM
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.t001
This steric constraint may help to understand differences in binding affinities and func-
tional activities. A similar bond does not seem to be present in the ortho-methoxybenzylated
compounds, possibly disfavored by the bulk of the O-methyl group.
Pharmacology
Binding assays. The affinities of the products for human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C
receptors were evaluated by radioligand displacement from cultured cells expressing the
appropriate human receptors (CHO h5-HT2A, CHO h5-HT2B, HeLa h5-HT2C). [3H]Ketan-
serin was used for 5-HT2A, [3H]LSD for 5-HT2B, and [3H]mesulergine for 5-HT2C (Table 1).
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
5 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Table 2. Human 5-HT2 receptor subtype Ca2+ mobilization potencies (pEC50 SEM, and EC50 in parentheses) and relative efficacies (% of response to 5-HT), and
5-HT2A/2C and (in parentheses) 5-HT2C/2A selectivities of serotonin, tryptamine, and the synthesized compounds.
Compound
R5
RX
RY
5-HT2A
5-HT2C
Selectivity
pEC50
% Emax
99.72 1.93
97.60 2.34
61.65 5.17
94.13 4.59
62.98 1.95
44.44 2.79
25.52 1.16
29.33 5.93
52.75 4.63
32.98 2.11
33.82 4.01
57.91 4.15
32.59 1.64
N.D.
pEC50
% Emax
5-HT2A/2C
(5-HT2C/2A
)
5-HT
OH
H
—
—
8.09 0.06
(8.13)
9.87 0.07
(0.13)
98.29 2.03
107.8 3.43
121.4 6.58
85.85 2.83
94.24 3.75
106.9 2.90
87.07 4.96
108.6 5.20
96.34 4.02
82.61 2.11
112.1 4.84
117.3 4.82
106.7 2.78
99.65 2.81
91.44 2.03
100.5 5.36
93.15 3.26
98.34 4.18
110.2 4.30
92.05 8.69
107.4 6.91
117.3 9.18
98.83 2.83
103.5 4.96
89.38 3.86
0.016
(62.5)
Tryptamine
—
—
7.76 0.07
(17.38)
8.93 0.13
(1.17)
0.067
(14.9)
1
2
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
6.79 0.24
(162.18)
7.30 0.15
(50.12)
0.31
(3.24)
2-OH
2-OMe
2-Me
2-Cl
6.70 0.11
(199.53)
7.47 0.12
(33.88)
0.17
(5.89)
3
H
5.81 0.07
(1548.82)
7.45 0.10
(35.48)
0.023
(43.7)
4
H
5.7 0.15
(1995.26)
6.86 0.09
(138.04)
0.069
(14.5)
5
H
6.33 0.10
(467.74)
6.71 0.14
(194.98)
0.42
(2.40)
6
2-Br
H
5.65 0.27
(2238.72)
6.63 0.13
(234.42)
0.10
(9.55)
7
3-OH
3-Me
3-F
H
7.25 0.23
(56.23)
8.17 0.20
(6.76)
0.12
(8.32)
8
H
7.21 0.18
(61.66)
7.53 0.06
(29.51)
0.48
(2.09)
9
H
6.41 0.26
(389.05)
6.95 0.10
(112.20)
0.29
(3.47)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
3-Cl
H
6.92 0.2
(120.23)
6.55 0.11
(281.84)
2.34
(0.43)
3-Br
H
7.23 0.14
(58.88)
7.26 0.07
(54.95)
0.93
(1.07)
4-OH
4-OMe
4-Me
4-OEt
4-Cl
H
N.D.
6.84 0.10
(144.54)
N.D.
H
7.34 0.06
(45.71)
108.2 2.78
N.D.
8.08 0.06
(8.32)
0.18
(5.49)
H
N.D.
5.92 0.14
(1202.26)
N.D.
H
6.44 0.34
(363.08)
36.73 6.13
79.96 4.54
N.D.
7.93 0.17
(11.75)
0.032
(30.9)
H
7.23 0.15
(58.88)
7.30 0.11
(50.12)
0.85
(1.17)
4-Br
H
N.D.
5.17 0.08
(6760.83)
N.D.
N.D.
4-NO2
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OH
2-OH
H
N.D.
N.D.
6.28 0.19
(524.81)
3-OMe
3-OMe
3-Br
3-F
5-Me
7.31 0.34
(48.98)
26.16 2.34
N.D.
7.03 0.15
(93.33)
1.91
(0.52)
N.D.
5.44 0.26
(3630.78)
N.D.
4.80 0.24
(15848.93)
40.38 6.23
53.62 4.49
43.57 0.90
7.56 0.10
(27.54)
0.0017
(575)
6.79 0.18
(162.18)
7.77 0.15
(16.98)
0.105
(9.55)
6.96 0.06
(109.65)
7.00 0.08
(100)
0.91
(1.10)
(Continued)
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
6 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Table 2. (Continued)
Compound
R5
RX
RY
5-HT2A
5-HT2C
Selectivity
pEC50
% Emax
pEC50
% Emax
5-HT2A/2C
(5-HT2C/2A
)
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
H
H
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OMe
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OMe
2-OH
2-OH
3-OMe
H
5-F
5-F
7.12 0.09
(75.86)
71.64 1.95
57.98 1.95
N.D.
7.58 0.12
(26.30)
105.2 2.19
109.7 2.19
107.8 2.88
110.8 4.63
109.7 3.35
118.4 4.45
74.75 2.60
117.2 4.59
103.5 2.91
91.67 6.60
100.5 2.85
112.7 3.47
88.69 4.22
106.2 4.32
105.1 4.32
93.52 3.05
89.38 3.86
106.1 3.05
0.35
(2.88)
7.22 0.09
(60.26)
7.28 0.12
(52.48)
0.87
(1.15)
H
5-Br
5-Br
5-Cl
5-OMe
4-Br
4-OMe
6-Br
6-F
N.D.
6.15 0.08
(707.95)
N.D.
H
4.75 0.08
(17782.79)
69.04 3.51
69.21 2.67
38.97 0.67
6.58 0.14
(263.03)
0.015
(67.6)
H
5.05 0.07
(8912.51)
6.62 0.10
(239.88)
0.027
(37.2)
H
5.46 0.04
(3467.37)
6.88 0.09
(131.83)
0.038
(26.3)
H
4.61 0.21
(24547.09)
62.53 10.79
N.D.
6.09 0.09
(812.83)
0.033
(30.2)
H
N.D.
6.62 0.13
(239.88)
N.D.
H
5.23 0.67
(5888.44)
34.40 1.37
49.28 3.23
50.52 8.27
63.19 1.44
83.66 3.42
47.74 1.57
44.79 0.99
60.53 2.41
43.57 0.90
83.26 2.26
6.10 0.08
(794.33)
0.13
(7.41)
H
7.40 0.16
(39.81)
7.73 0.19
(18.62)
0.47
(2.13)
H
4-OMe
H
5.65 0.35
(2238.7)
7.24 0.11
(57.54)
0.026
(38.9)
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
7.69 0.10
(20.42)
7.84 0.13
(14.45)
0.71
(1.41)
2-OMe
2-Cl
H
8.70 0.20
(1.99)
8.42 0.16
(3.80)
1.91
(0.53)
H
7.92 0.11
(12.02)
7.09 0.09
(81.28)
6.76
(0.15)
2-Br
H
7.53 0.06
(29.51)
7.56 0.14
(27.54)
0.93
(1.07)
4-Br
H
5.73 0.10
(1862.09)
6.88 0.15
(131.83)
0.071
(14.1)
2-OH
2-OH
5-OMe
5-F
6.96 0.06
(109.65)
7.00 0.08
(100)
0.91
(1.1)
8.86 0.10
(1.38)
8.44 0.12
(3.63)
2.63
(0.38)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.t002
It should be noted that the affinities at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors were determined by
displacement of antagonist radioligands, and therefore reflect binding to both active and inac-
tive receptor conformations, while an agonist, presumably binding to an active conformation,
was used for the 5-HT2B affinity determinations. Therefore, the 5-HT2B affinities are not
strictly comparable to the others, and were not considered in the selectivity estimates.
The vast majority of the our products revealed submicromolar affinities at all three receptor
subtypes, and a small number gave Ki values in the 10 nanomolar range, although these values
did not seem to follow any general trend. N-benzyltryptamine (1) bound to the 5-HT2A and
5-HT2C receptors with rather similar affinities to those reported for N,N-dimethyltryptamine
(237 and 424 nM, respectively), but significantly better than N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (1.2
and 6.5 μM, respectively) [27]. N-Benzyl-5-methoxytryptamine (37) bound to both receptors
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
7 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Fig 2. Synthesis of N-(substituted)benzyltryptamines. a: MeOH, r.t., overnight; b: NaBH4 in small portions, r.t.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g002
5–15 times more strongly than N-isopropyl-N-methyl-5-methoxytryptamine (165 nM and
1.3 μM, respectively) [27].
Comparison of our tryptamine derivatives with the corresponding 5-methoxylated analogs
seemed to indicate some degree of parallelism. Thus, compounds 38, 40, and 41, described
recently [19], which in our hands gave similar binding results to those published, are the
5-methoxytryptamine analogs of the 2-methoxy-, 2-bromo- and 4-bromobenzyltryptamines 3,
6, and 17, respectively. While in our case the human receptors were expressed in CHO (Chi-
nese hamster ovary) cells, and in the paper by Nichols et al. [19] in human embryonic kidney
(HEK) cells, our results for compounds 40 and 41 agree with theirs within a factor of 2. In the
case of 38 our results do not differ by more than 2.7 times, which seems reasonable for data
from different laboratories and determined in different biological substrates.
Compounds 3 and 17, lacking the indole 5-methoxy group showed 2–4 times lower affini-
ties than their indole-methoxylated counterparts 38 and 41, at all three receptor subtypes, in
line with the observations of Heim [12] and Silva et al. [14] for 1 vs. 37. Contrary to expecta-
tions, the rather strongly binding N-(2-chlorobenzyl)tryptamine (5) had slightly greater affin-
ity than its 5-methoxytryptamine analog 39, at least at the 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptors. (Fig
1). It may be pointed out that, as noted by Jensen [21] and Nichols [19], the supposedly very
high-affinity [11] N-4-bromobenzyl-5-methoxytryptamine (41) was not at all exceptional.
Compounds 8, 10 and 11, bearing a single hydrophobic substituent at the meta position of
the benzyl group (CH3, Cl, or Br), bound rather strongly to the 5-HT2 receptors with 2 to
8-fold 5-HT2A/2C selectivity, as had been seen for their 5-methoxytryptamine counterparts
(respectively 5j, 5h and 5e in that paper) [19]. Intriguingly, however, the 3-chlorobenzyl deriv-
ative 10 had somewhat lower affinity than the 2-chloro analog 5. In contrast, 5-fluoro-2-hydro-
xybenzyl substitution gave profoundly different results in the tryptamine and the
5-methoxytryptamine series: the 5-methoxytryptamine derivative (43) had the highest 5-HT2A
Fig 3. Intramolecular hydrogen bond in N-(2’-hydroxybenzyl)tryptamines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g003
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
8 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
affinity (pKi = 8.4) of the whole series, while N-(5-fluoro-2-hydroxybenzyl)tryptamine (24)
bound quite poorly to this receptor (pKi = 6.1), and was slightly selective for the 2C subtype.
Almost half of our compounds bear an ortho-oxygen substituent on the benzyl moiety,
which was introduced as a test of Heim’s “structure-activity concept” regarding the increased
activity of 2-methoxybenzyl derivatives [12]. Comparing the N-benzyl- (1), N-2-hydroxyben-
zyl- (2) and N-2-methoxybenzyl- (3) tryptamines, 5-HT2A (and also 5-HT2B) affinity appeared
to increase slightly in that order, although at most by a factor of 2.7. At the 5-HT2C receptor
the affinities fluctuated in the same range. These changes can hardly be considered significant.
Similarly, in several pairs of compounds in which binding could be compared, introduction of
an ortho hydroxyl or methoxyl group had at most a very minor effect. The only exceptions
were the N-3-chlorobenzyl- (10) and N-3-bromobenzyl- (11) tryptamines, where substitution
to afford the N-5-chloro-2-methoxybenzyl (28) and N-5-bromo-2-methoxybenzyl (11) and to
a lesser extent N-5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl (26) analogs, was markedly damaging, at least for
5-HT2A receptor binding. Thus, the presence of an ortho-oxygen substituent on the benzyl
ring does not seem to be generally beneficial and, with the exceptions of the 2-hydroxy-
3-methoxybenzyl and the 2-hydroxy-3-bromobenzyl derivatives 19 and 21, the N-disubsti-
tuted benzyltryptamines showed rather low affinities. On the other hand, in our limited
5-methoxytryptamine series, the 2-hydroxy-5-fluoro derivative 43 showed surprisingly strong
5-HT2A receptor binding, and it also bound fairly strongly to the 5-HT2C receptor.
Functional assays
The functional activities of our compounds at human 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors were
determined fluorometrically as calcium mobilization in CHO h5-HT2A and HeLa h5-HT2C
cells (Table 2).
Comparison of our results for the N-2-methoxybenzyl- (38), N-2-bromobenzyl- (40), and N-
4-bromobenzyl- (41) 5-methoxytryptamine derivatives with those of Nichols et al. [19] indicates
complete agreement in functional potencies in one case, and differences of somewhat more
than an order of magnitude in the others, although practically full agonism at the 5-HT2C recep-
tor seems to be the norm. The use of different cell lines is probably responsible in part for these
discrepancies, but it must be kept in mind that 5-HT2 receptors display differential functional
selectivity [28,29] and β-arrestin signaling bias [24] which are other factors to be considered.
Comparing tryptamine with 5-methoxytryptamine derivatives, the N-2-methoxybenzyl
(NBOMe) derivative 3 was several hundred times less potent than its 5-methoxytryptamine
analog 38 in the h5-HT2A receptor functional assay, and the N-2-chlorobenzyl 5 was almost 40
times less potent than its counterpart 39. A comparison of 17 with 41 was not possible because
the functional activity of the former was too low for quantification. At the h5-HT2C receptor, 3
and 5 were only 2–9 times less potent than the corresponding 5-methoxytryptamine deriva-
tives. It seems likely that while a 5-methoxyl group on the indole moiety can result in consider-
ably higher potency at the h5-HT2A subtype, it may have a less significant effect at the
h5-HT2C receptor.
Almost two decades ago we found that the electrophysiologically determined rank poten-
cies of several hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic phenylisopropylamines were consistent
with the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C affinities obtained in radioligand displacement assays, and the
2C/2A affinity ratios paralleled the potency ratios reported in that work [30]. Although both
the voltage-clamp assay used then and the fluorescence assay used in the present work depend
on intracellular calcium release, other mechanisms are active in cells and the final result of
receptor activation may not show such correlations. As far back as 1997 a modified ternary
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
9 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
receptor model was invoked to explain discrepancies [31], and it has recently been shown that
the binding profile alone can reasonably predict strong hallucinogenic effects in vivo [18,32].
As seen with respect to the affinities of these compounds for the three receptor subtypes,
apparently similar molecules sometimes behave quite differently, defying interpretation. Many
of these substances seem uninteresting as 5-HT2 agonists because of their low potencies. How-
ever, a few of them exhibit low nanomolar EC50 values, at either subtype, without following
any obvious rule. Interest in N-benzylated phenethylamines and indoleamines has focused
mainly on their possible psychedelic activities related to full or partial agonism at 5-HT2A
receptors [4]. In this regard, it is worth noting that the reported 5-HT2A affinities of N-benzyl-
5-methoxytryptamines were generally several times lower than those of the correspondingly
N-benzylated 2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)ethylamines, with the sole exception (30x) of
the “superpotent” N-(2-methoxybenzyl) analog (25I-NBOMe), but their in vitro functional
potencies did not follow this trend [19]. The rodent head twitch response is commonly
believed to distinguish 5-HT2A agonists that are psychedelic in humans from others that are
not [25]. The EC50 values determined for those N-benzyl-5-methoxytryptamines which elicited
the response (not all did) indicated potencies at least 30 times lower than that of 25I-NBOMe
[19]. One could therefore expect that very few (e.g. 38 and 43, Fig 3) of these compounds
might be human hallucinogens in the low milligram dose range, significantly higher than the
commonly abused NBOMe phenethylamines. Considering the binding affinities instead of the
calcium mobilization data, a fair number of our compounds exhibit pKi values greater than 7
and might show psychedelic properties at doses of a few tens of milligrams (Fig 4).
It may be noted that compound 38 was described by Nichols [19] (as 5a) and found to be
the most potent 5-HT2A receptor agonist in his series of N-benzyl-5-methoxytryptamines,
with Ki = 16.6 nM, EC50 = 1.9 nM and Emax = 81% (our values are 44.7 nM, 2.0 nM and 84%,
respectively, in quite good agreement). It also gave an ED50 = 3.15 mg/kg in the mouse head
twitch response (HTR) assay which is commonly viewed as a predictor of human psychedelic
activity [25]. For the sake of comparison, the potent psychedelic 25I-NBOMe (4-iodo-
2,5-dimethoxy-N-(2-methoxybenzyl)phenethylamine) exhibits a much lower Ki = 0.52 nM,
almost identical IC50 and relative efficacy data, but its HTR result, ED50 = 0.078 mg/kg, sug-
gests a 40-fold higher in vivo potency. Assuming that the HTR is a trustworthy model, we
again see that the binding affinity seems to be a better predictor of psychedelic activity than
functional potency, at least when determined as calcium mobilization.
A result that appeared with striking regularity was that almost all the compounds were par-
tial agonists at the h5-HT2A and full agonists at the h5-HT2C receptor (or possibly “super ago-
nists” eliciting a stronger response than serotonin). Moreover, a small number of these showed
significant 5-HT2C selectivity, sometimes coupled with EC50 values below 100 nM.
N-(3-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)tryptamine (21), which in spite of its modest 5-HT2A
affinity is an extremely weak h5-HT2A partial agonist (pEC50 = 4.8) and a full agonist with
a pEC50 of 7.6 (EC50 = 27 nM) at the h5-HT2C receptor, is an extreme case that might be a
Fig 4. Possibly psychedelic N-benzyl-5-methoxytryptamines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g004
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
10 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
particularly interesting candidate for in vivo studies. Other, less conspicuous examples, are the
N-2-methoxybenzyl 3, the N-4-ethoxybenzyl 15, and the N-3,4-dimethoxybenzyl 36. These
compounds are 30 to 40-fold selective with EC50 values between 12 and 60 nM (pEC50 7.95 to
7.24). Less potent, but still selective, are the 2’-methoxy-5´-halo derivatives 27 and 28 (Fig 5).
Although not very potent, these N-benzylated tryptamines are more 5-HT2C/5-HT2A selec-
tive than the approved 5-HT2C agonist appetite suppressant lorcaserin (1(R)-8-chloro-
1-methyl.2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine): Ki(2A/2C) about 8, and EC50(2A/2C) about 20
[33] (Fig 6).
Lorcaserin is the first drug in its class to be approved by the FDA [34] as an anorexic. Like
our N-benzylated tryptamine derivatives, lorcaserin is a full 5-HT2C agonist, and a partial ago-
nist (about 70% efficacy) at 5-HT2A receptors [35]. Because of its modest 5-HT2C/5-HT2A
selectivity, lorcaserin is recommended exclusively for patients meeting specific criteria and has
been placed in Schedule IV (prescription only) due to its presumed ability “to produce halluci-
nations, euphoria, and positive subjective responses at supratherapeutic doses” [34]. While 21
is about 3 times less potent than lorcaserin, it is much more selective vs. 5-HT2A receptors, at
which it also exhibits low efficacy, and therefore might not be expected to produce the above-
mentioned side effects at any reasonable dose level. Unfortunately, its appreciable affinity for
the 5-HT2B receptor militates against its acceptance, at least for prolonged use.
To summarize, our large series of N-benzylated tryptamines revealed a very broad range of
affinities for the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor subtypes spread over three orders of magnitude and
generally showing little selectivity (tenfold at most, but usually much less) between the 2A and
2C subtypes. The ability of these compounds to elicit calcium mobilization was also quite vari-
able and with no obvious correlation with their affinity. Unlike the binding studies, the func-
tional assays exhibited significant selectivity with an unexpected bias favoring the 5-HT2C
receptor. Besides, our compounds were generally full 2C agonists and only partial agonists,
sometimes with rather low efficacy, at the 2A subtype. This fact, coupled with the selective acti-
vation of 5-HT2C receptors by several of these substances points them out as possible leads for
the development of a novel series of compounds of interest in the areas of appetite reduction
and the treatment of drug abuse, schizophrenia and sexual dysfunctions.
Fig 5. 5-HT2C-selective N-benzyltryptamines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g005
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
11 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Fig 6. Structure and 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C functional potencies of lorcaserin.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804.g006
Materials and methods
Chemistry
´
The tryptamine used was a generous gift from Prof. Michel Lebœuf, Faculte de Pharmacie de
ˆ
´
Chatenay-Malabry, Universite de Paris XI, France. 5-Methoxytryptamine and most of the
aldehydes were purchased from AK Scientific Inc. (Palo Alto, CA). Some aldehydes were pre-
pared by standard aromatic bromination or O-methylation from the above precursors. Sol-
vents were of synthesis grade, purchased from Merck S.A. (Santiago, Chile), and were used
without additional purification. Melting points were determined on a Stuart SMP 10 appara-
tus, and NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 instrument using the residual
solvent signal as the internal standard.
The appropriate aromatic aldehyde (approx. 5 mmol) and the equivalent amount of trypt-
amine or 5-methoxytryptamine, each dissolved in MeOH (5 mL each) were placed in a 100
mL flask and allowed to react at r.t. for at least 120 min. Then solid NaBH4 (a small molar
excess) was added in small portions with stirring, and the resulting solution was stirred at r.t.
for another 12 h The MeOH was removed, the solid taken up in dilute HCl, the solution made
alkaline and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic extract was washed with water and dried over
Na2SO4, the solvent was removed and the N-benzylated amine was purified by ball-to-ball dis-
tillation or column chromatography if necessary (Scheme 1).
The free bases were dissolved in the smallest possible volume of 2-PrOH, acetone, or
MeOH, depending on their solubility. A small excess of 37% HCl diluted with 2-propanol was
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
12 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
added, followed by Et2O (at least three volumes). The precipitated salt was filtered off, washed
with Et2O and vacuum dried. Some hydroxyl-containing bases gave hygroscopic hydrochlo-
rides, but their succinic or fumaric acid salts crystallized satisfactorily. To prepare them, the
free bases were dissolved as above in acetone or MeOH, and treated dropwise, with stirring,
with one equivalent or half an equivalent of a concentrated MeOH solution of succinic or
fumaric acid to obtain the acid (hemisuccinate and hemifumarate) or the neutral (fumarate)
salts. The resulting solutions were concentrated to dryness and the products recrystallized in
acetone, CHCl3 or CH2Cl2, filtered, and vacuum dried.
N-Benzyl-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (1) hydrochloride. 75% yield, m.p. 188–189˚C.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.96 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.33 (2H, brs, NH2 ), 7.57 (3H, m,
+
H3’, H5’, H7), 7.44 (3H, m, H2’, H4’, H6’) 7.36 (1H, dd, J � 8 Hz, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 6.94–
7.18 (2H, m, H5, H6), 4.19 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.13 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2-Hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (2) hydrochloride. 68% yield, m.
p. 222–223˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.94 (1H, s, NH-1), 10.20 (1H, s, OH),
+
8.85 (2H, brs, NH2 ), 7.53 (1H, dd, H7), 7.37 (2H, m, H4, H3’) 7.25 (1H, dd, H6’), 7.22 (1H, s,
H2), 7.10 (1H, dd, H4’), 6.96 (2H, m, H6, H5’), 6.85 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.15 (2H, unresolved t, α’-
CH2), 3.12 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2-Methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (3) hydrochloride. 72% yield, m.
p. 229–230˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.04 (2H, brs, NH2 ),
+
7.55 (1H, dd, H7), 7.46 (2H, m, H3’, H4’), 7.39 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.11 (2H, m, H6,
H5’), 7.00 (2H, m, H5, H6’), 4.17 (2H, t, α’-CH2), 3.82 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2-Methylbenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (4) hydrochloride. 78% yield. m.
p. 209–210˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.41 (2H, brs, NH2 ),
+
7.61 (1H, dd, H7), 7.57 (1H, dd, H6’), 7.37 (1H, dd, H4), 7.30 (1H, ddd, H3’), 7.27 (2H, m, H4’,
H5’), 7.24 (1H, d, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.01 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.18 (2H, unresolved t, α’-
CH2), 3.21 (4H, m, 2CH2), 2.40 (3H, s, CH3).
N-(2-Chlorobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (5) hydrochloride. 85% yield. m.
+
p. 225–226˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.00 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.70 (2H, brs, NH2 ),
7.84 (1H, dd, H3’), 7.59 (1H, dd, H7), 7.55 (1H, ddd, H4’), 7.45 (2H, m, H5’, H6’), 7.37 (1H,
dd, H4), 7.24 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.32 (2H, unresolved t, α’-
CH2), 3.20 (4H, m, 2CH2).
N-(2-Bromobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (6) hydrochloride. 87% yield. m.
p. 228–229˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.51 (2H, brs, NH2 ),
+
7.79 (1H, dd, H7), 7.73 (1H, dd, H3’), 7.59 (1H, dd, H4), 7.50 (1H, td, H6’), 7.38 (2H, m, H4’,
H5’), 7.25 (1H, s, H2), 7.10 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.01 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.32 (2H, unresolved t, α’-
CH2), 3.21 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(3-Hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (7) neutral fumarate. 68% yield. m.
p. 206–207˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.84 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.50 (1H, dd, H7),
7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.10 (1H, unresolved dd, H6’), 6.82 (1H, unresolved d, H2’), 6.80 (1H, dd,
H5’), 6.68 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.15 (1H, s, H2), 7.06 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.96 (1H, ddd, H5), 3.83 (2H,
unresolved t, α’-CH2), 2.93 (4H, brs, 2CH2), 6.47 (1H, s, fumarate).
N-(3-Methylbenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (8) hydrochloride. 85% yield. m.
p. 189–190˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.43 (2H, brs, NH2+)
7.56 (1H, dd, H7), 7.37 (3H, m, H4’, H5’, H6’), 7.34 (1H, dd, H4), 7.26 (1H, d, H2’), 7.22 (1H,
s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.99 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.14 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.13 (4H, brs,
2CH2), 2.32 (3H, s, CH3).
N-(3-Fluorobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (9) hydrochloride. 86% yield. m.
p. 223–225˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.97 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.58 (2H, brs, NH2 )
+
7.57 (1H, dd, H7), 7.55 (1H, ddd, H4’), 7.49 (1H, unresolved dd, H5’), 7.44 (1H, unresolved d,
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
13 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
H2’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.27 (1H, unresolved dd, H6’), 7.23 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6),
7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.21 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(3-Chlorobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (10) hydrochloride. 83% yield. m.
+
p. 209–211˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.62 (2H, brs, NH2 )
7.74 (1H, s, H2’), 7.58 (2H, m, H7, H4’), 7.47 (2H, unresolved signals, H5’, H6’), 7.36 (1H, dd,
H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.20 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2),
3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(3-Bromobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (11) hydrochloride. 88% yield. m.
p. 216–218˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.54 (2H, brs, NH2+)
7.86 (1H, s, H2’), 7.59 (3H, m, H7, H4’, H5’), 7.40 (2H, unresolved signals, H4, H6’), 7.22 (1H,
s, H2), 7.10 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.97 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.20 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.14 (4H, brs,
2CH2).
N-(4-Hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (12) (free base). 95% yield. m.p. n.
d. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.76 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.48 (1H, dd, H7), 7.32 (1H, dd,
H4), 7.09 (1H, s, H2), 7.08 (2H, d, H2’, H6’), 7.05 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.95 (1H, ddd, H5), 6.68 (2H,
d, H3’, H5’), 3.61 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 2.84 (2H, t, CH2), 2.76 (2H, t, CH2).
N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (13) hydrochloride. 78% yield. m.
p. 199–200˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.26 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.55 (1H, dd, H7), 7.49 (2H, d, H2’, H6’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd,
H6), 6.99 (3H, m, H5, H3’, H5’), 4.11 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.77 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.10
(4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(4-Methylbenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (14) hydrochloride. 73% yield. m.
p. 213–214˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.97 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.41 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.56 (1H, dd, H7), 7.46 (2H, d, H2’, H6’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (2H, d, H3’, H5’), 7.21 (1H, s,
H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.98 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.13 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.12 (4H, brs,
2CH2), 2.32 (3H, s, CH3).
N-(4-Ethoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (15) hydrochloride. 82% yield. m.
p. 206–208˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.98 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.38 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.56 (1H, dd, H7), 7.49 (2H, d, H2’, H6’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.21 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd,
H6), 6.98 (3H, m, H5, H3’, H5’), 4.07 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 4.00 (2H, unresolved qua-
druplet, ethoxyl CH2) 3.11 (4H, brs, 2CH2), 1.32 (3H, t, ethoxyl CH3).
N-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (16) hydrochloride. 85% yield. m.
p. 229–230˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.97 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.52 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.62 (2H, overlapping d, H3’, H5’), 7.58 (1H, overlapping dd, H7), 7.50 (2H, overlapping d,
H2’, H6’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.99 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.19
(2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.13 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(4-Bromobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (17) hydrochloride. 86% yield. m.
p. 238–240˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.96 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.43 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.65 (2H, d, H3’, H5’), 7.55 (3H, m, H2’, H6’, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.09
(1H, ddd, H6), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.17 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.13 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(4-Nitrobenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (18) hydrochloride. 90% yield. m.p. 212–
214˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.80 (2H, brs, NH2+), 8.28 (2H,
d, H3’, H5’), 7.89 (2H, d, H2’, H6’), 7.59 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (1H, s, H2), 7.09
(1H, ddd, H6), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.35 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.17 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (19) neutral succinate.
58% yield. m.p. 109–111˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.83 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.49
(1H, dd, H7), 7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.15 (1H, s, H2), 7.06 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.97 (1H, ddd, H5), 6.86
(1H, dd, H5’), 6.71 (2H, overlapping dd, H4’, H6’), 3.94 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.75 (3H,
s, OCH3), 2.91 (4H, brs, 2CH2), 2.32 (2H, s, succinate).
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
14 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
N-(2,3-Dimethoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (20) hydrochloride. 70% yield.
m.p. 210–212˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.35 (2H, brs, NH2
+), 7.56 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.20 (1H, overlapping dd, H5’), 7.12
(2H, overlapping dd, H4’, H6’), 7.09 (1H, overlapping ddd, H6), 6.99 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.17 (2H,
unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.83 (3H, s, OCH3-3’), 3.79 (3H, s, OCH3-2’), 3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(3-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (21) neutral succinate.
75% yield. m.p. 141–142˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.83 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.50
(1H, dd, H7), 7.37 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.17 (1H, s, H2), 7.05 (2H, overlapping
ddd, H6, H6’), 6.96 (1H, ddd, H5), 6.64 (1H, t, H5’), 3.99 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 2.89 (4H,
brs, 2CH2), 2.39 (2H, s, succinate).
N-(3-Fluoro-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (22) neutral succinate.
72% yield. m.p. 151–152˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.82 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.50
(1H, dd, H7), 7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.16 (1H, s, H2), 7.06 (2H, overlapping ddd, H6, H4’), 6.97
(1H, ddd, H5), 6.91 (1H, dd, H5’), 6.70 (1H, quadruplet, H6’), 3.99 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2),
2.90 (4H, brs, 2CH2), 2.35 (2H, s, succinate).
N-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (23) acid fumarate. 48%
yield. m.p. 183–185˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.89 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.51 (1H, dd,
H7), 7.35 (1H, dd, H4), 7.17 (1H, s, H2), 7.07 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.01 (1H, d, H6’), 6.97 (1H, over-
lapping ddd, H5), 6.93 (1H, overlapping dd, H4’), 6.70 (1H, d, H3’), 3.95 (2H, unresolved t, α’-
CH2), 2.96 (4H, brs, 2CH2), 2.17 (3H, s, CH3-5’), 6.49 (2H, s, fumarate).
N-(5-Fluoro-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (24) hydrochloride. 62%
yield. m.p. 185–186˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.82 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.50 (1H, dd,
H7), 7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.16 (1H, s, H2), 7.07 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.01 (1H, dd, H3’), 6.98 (1H, ddd,
H5), 6.91 (1H, ddd, H4’), 6.72 (1H, dd, H6’), 3.90 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 2.90 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(5-Fluoro-2-methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (25) hydrochloride. 70%
yield. m.p. 179–180˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.32 (2H,
brs, NH2+), 7.55 (1H, dd, H7), 7.47 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (2H, m, H2, H6’),
7.09 (2H, m, H6, H3’), 6.99 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.15 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.80 (3H, s,
OCH3), 3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(5-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (26) hydrochloride. 45%
yield. m.p. 188–189˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.95 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.53 (1H, dd,
H7), 7.47 (1H, d, H3’), 7.32 (1H, dd, H4), 7.13 (2H, m, H6, H4’), 7.05 (1H, ddd, H5), 6.96 (1H,
s H2,), 5.98 (1H, s, H6’), 3.43 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.07 (4H, m, 2CH2).
N-(5-Bromo-2-methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (27) hydrochloride. 50%
yield. m.p. 192–193˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.00 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.29 (2H,
brs, NH2+), 7.76 (1H, d, H6’), 7.57 (2H, overlapping dd, H7, H4’), 7.37 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (1H,
s, H2), 7.09 (2H, m, H6, H3’), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.15 (2H, t, α’-CH2), 3.81 (3H, s, OCH3),
3.14 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(5-Chloro-2-methoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (28) hydrochloride. 72%
yield. m.p. 184–185˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.00 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.29 (2H, brs,
NH2+), 7.65 (1H, d, H6’), 7.57 (1H, dd, H7), 7.46 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.37 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (1H, s,
H2), 7.09 (2H, m, H6, H3’), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.15 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.82 (3H, s,
OCH3), 3.15 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2,5-Dimethoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (29) hydrochloride. 86% yield.
m.p. 175–176˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.22 (2H, brs,
+
NH2 ), 7.55 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.21 (1H, overlapping d, H6’),
7.09 (1H, ddd, H6,), 6.99 (2H, overlapping dd, H3’, H4’), 6.95 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.13 (2H, s, α’-
CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3-2’), 3.73 (3H, s, OCH3-5’), 3.13 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
15 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
N-(5-Nitro-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (30) hydrochloride. 76%
yield. m.p. 194–196˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.95 (1H, s, NH-1), 8.00 (1H, s,
H6’), 7.88 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.53 (1H, dd, H7), 7.35 (1H, dd, H4), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.08 (1H, ddd,
H6,), 6.98 (1H, ddd, H5), 6.29 (1H, dd, H3’), 4.02 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.05 (4H, brs,
2CH2).
N-(4-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (31) hydrochloride. 66%
yield. m.p. 192–194˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.81 (1H, s, NH-1), 8.99 (2H,
brs, NH2+), 7.54 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (2H, overlapping dd, H4, H5’), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.16 (1H,
d, H3’), 7.09 (1H, overlapping ddd, H6), 7.04 (1H, overlapping dd, H6’), 7.00 (1H, overlapping
dd, H5), 4.11 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.12 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (32) hydrochloride. 73% yield.
m.p. 184–186˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.99 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.03 (2H, brs, NH2
+), 7.54 (1H, dd, H7), 7.38 (2H, overlapping dd, H4, H5’), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.09 (1H, overlap-
ping ddd, H6), 6.99 (1H, overlapping ddd, H5), 6.61 (1H, d, H3’), 6.57 (1H, d, H6’), 4.07 (2H,
unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.80 (3H, s, OCH3-2’), 3.78 (3H, s, OCH3-4’), 3.11 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(6-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (33) hydrochloride. 62%
yield. m.p. 195–196˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.07 (1H, s, NH-1), 11.01 (1H, s,
+
OH), 9.09 (2H, brs, NH2 ), 7.55 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.23 (1H, s, H2), 7.19 (1H,
dd, H5’), 7.13 (1H, dd, H4’), 7.08 (1H, ddd, H6), 7.07 (1H, dd, H3’), 7.00 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.29
(2H, s, α’-CH2), 3.17 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(6-Fluoro-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (34) neutral succinate.
58% yield. m.p. 159–161˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.82 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.49
(1H, dd, H7), 7.33 (1H, dd, H4), 7.15 (1H, s, H2), 7.11 (1H, dd, H5’), 7.06 (1H, ddd, H6), 6.97
(1H, ddd, H5), 6.58 (2H, overlapping dd, H3’, H4’), 3.97 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 2.90 (4H,
brs, 2CH2), 2.35 (2H, s, succinate).
N-(3,5-Dibromo-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (35) hydrochloride.
65% yield. m.p. 183–184˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.97 (1H, s, NH-1), 7.82
(1H, d, H4’), 7.71 (1H, d, H6’), 7.57 (1H, dd, H7), 7.38 (1H, dd, H4), 7.24 (1H, s, H2), 7.10
(1H, ddd, H6), 7.02 (1H, ddd, H5), 4.23 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.18 (2H, unresolved t,
CH2), 3.11 (2H, unresolved t, CH2).
N-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (36) hydrochloride. 83% yield.
m.p. 238–240˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.97 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.34 (2H, brs, NH2
+), 7.56 (1H, dd, H7), 7.36 (1H, dd, H4), 7.31 (1H, dd, H2’), 7.22 (1H, s, H2), 7.08 (1H, over-
lapped d, H6’), 7.06 (1H, overlapping ddd, H6), 7.00 (1H, d, H5’), 6.97 (1H, overlapped ddd,
H5), 4.10 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.78 (3H, s, OCH3-3’), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3-4’), 3.12 (4H,
brs, 2CH2).
N-Benzyl-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (37) hydrochloride. 84% yield. m.
p. 233–234˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.80 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.51 (2H, brs, NH2+),
7.60 (2H, m, H2’, H6’), 7.42 (3H, m, H3’, H4’, H5’), 7.24 (1H, d, H7), 7.16 (1H, s, H2), 7.10
(1H, d, H4), 6.73 (1H, dd, H6), 4.18 (2H, t, α’-CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.10 (4H, brs,
2CH2).
N-(2-Methoxybenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-il)ethyl]amine (38) hydrochloride.
71% yield. m.p. 240–241˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.81 (1H, s, NH-1), 8.79
(2H, brs, NH2+), 7.49 (1H, dd, H6’), 7.39 (1H, ddd, H5’), 7.25 (1H, d, H7), 7.16 (1H, s, H2),
7.06 (2H, m, H4, H3’), 6.98 (1H, ddd, H4’), 6.74 (1H, dd, H6), 4.10 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 3.79 (3H,
s, OCH3-2’), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.07 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
N-(2-Chlorobenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (39) hydrochloride. 85%
yield. m.p. 193–194˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.82 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.64 (2H,
brs, NH2+), 7.83 (1H, ddd, H4’), 7.56 (1H, ddd, H5’), 7.45 (2H, overlapped dd, H3’, H6’), 7.25
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
16 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
(1H, d, H7), 7.19 (1H, d, H2), 7.12 (1H, s, H4), 6.75 (1H, dd, H6), 4.32 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 3.77
(3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.17 (4H, m, 2CH2).
N-(2-Bromobenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (40) hydrochloride. 83%
yield. m.p. 206–207˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.79 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.56 (2H,
brs, NH2+), 7.80 (1H, dd, H3’), 7.73 (1H, dd, H6’), 7.50 (1H, ddd, H4’), 7.37 (1H, ddd, H5’),
7.26 (1H, d, H7), 7.20 (1H, s, H2), 7.11 (1H, d, H4), 6.75 (1H, dd, H6), 4.32 (2H, s, α’-CH2),
3.77 (3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.17 (4H, m, 2CH2).
N-(4-Bromobenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (41) hydrochloride. 80%
yield. m.p. 240–241˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.80 (1H, s, NH-1), 9.36 (2H, brs,
NH2+), 7.66 (2H, dd, H3’, H5’), 7.53 (2H, dd, H2’, H6’), 7.25 (1H, d, H7), 7.17 (1H, s, H2),
7.06 (1H, d, H4), 6.74 (1H, dd, H6), 4.18 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 3.76 (3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.09 (4H, brs,
2CH2).
N-(2-Hydroxy-5-methoxybenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (42) acid
fumarate. 48% yield. m.p. 196–197˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.74 (1H, s, NH-
1), 7,22 (1H, d, H7), 7.13 (1H, s, H2), 7.00 (1H, d, H4), 6.92 (1H, d, H6’), 6.78 (2H, m, H3’,
H4’), 6.72 (1H, dd, H6), 6.53 (2H, s, fumarate), 4.02 (2H, s, α’-CH2), 3.74 (3H, s, OCH3-5’),
3.66 (3H, s, OCH3-5), 3.00 (4H, brs, 2CH).
N-(5-Fluoro-2-hydroxybenzyl)-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]amine (43) neutral
fumarate. 55% yield. m.p. 200–201˚C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.66 (1H, s, NH-
1), 7.22 (1H, d, H7), 7.11 (1H, s, H2), 7.04 (1H, dd, H4’), 6.97 (1H, d, H4), 6.90 (1H, d, H3’),
6.73 (2H, m, H6, H6’), 6.51 (1H, s, fumarate), 3.92 (2H, unresolved t, α’-CH2), 3.74 (3H, s,
OCH3-5), 2.89 (4H, brs, 2CH2).
Pharmacology
Binding studies
Competition binding to the human 5-HT2A receptor. Serotonin 5-HT2A receptor com-
petition binding experiments were carried out in polypropylene 96-well plates. In each well
were incubated 60 μg of membranes from a CHO-5-HT2A cell line prepared in our laboratory,
1 nM [3H]ketanserin (47.3 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, Perkin Elmer NET791250UC), studied com-
pounds and standard. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of methysergide
1 μM (Sigma M137). The reaction mixture (Vt: 250 μL/well) was incubated at 37˚C for 30 min,
200 μL was transferred to a GF/B 96-well plate (Millipore, Madrid, Spain) pretreated with
0.5% of PEI and treated with binding buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH = 7.4), and was filtered and
washed six times with 250 μL wash buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH = 6.6), and 35 μL of Universol
Scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Alcobendas, Spain) were added to each well before count-
ing in a microplate beta scintillation counter (Microbeta Trilux, PerkinElmer, Madrid, Spain).
Competition binding to the human 5-HT2B receptor. Serotonin 5-HT2B receptor com-
petition binding experiments were carried out in polypropylene 96-well plates. In each well
were incubated 5 μg of membranes from a CHO-5-HT2B cell line prepared in our laboratory, 1
nM [3H]LSD (75.9 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, Perkin Elmer NET638250UC), studied compounds
and standard. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 5-HT 50 μM (Sigma
H9523). The reaction mixture (Vt: 250 μL/well) was incubated at 37˚C for 30 min, 200 μL was
transferred to a GF/C 96-well plate (Millipore, Madrid, Spain) pretreated with 0.5% of PEI and
treated with binding buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, ascorbic acid 0.1%, CaCl2 4 mM, pH = 7.4), and
was filtered and washed four times with 250 μL wash buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH = 7.4), and
35 μL of Universol Scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Alcobendas, Spain) were added to each
well before counting in a microplate beta scintillation counter (Microbeta Trilux, PerkinElmer,
Madrid, Spain).
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
17 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
Competition binding to the human 5-HT2C receptor. Serotonin 5-HT2C receptor com-
petition binding experiments were carried out in polypropylene 96-well plates. In each well
were incubated 3 μg of membranes from a Hela-5-HT2C cell line prepared in our laboratory,
1.25 nM [3H]mesulergine (83.1 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, Perkin Elmer NET1148250UC), studied
compounds and standard. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of mianserin
10 μM (Sigma M2525). The reaction mixture (Vt: 250 μL/well) was incubated at 27˚C for 60
min, 200 μL was transferred to a GF/C 96-well plate (Millipore, Madrid, Spain) pretreated
with 0.5% of PEI and treated with binding buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH = 7.5), and was filtered
and washed four times with 250 μL wash buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH = 6.6), and 35 μL of
Universol Scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Alcobendas, Spain) were added to each well
before counting in a microplate beta scintillation counter (Microbeta Trilux, PerkinElmer,
Madrid, Spain).
Functional studies
Functional activities were assessed by measuring Ca2+ release in CHO-5-HT2A or HeLa-
5-HT2C cells. The day before the assay, 2000 (5-HT2A) or 10000 (5-HT2C) cells/well were
seeded in 384 well black plates (Greiner 781091). The cells were incubated with 25 μL of Fura-
2 QBTTM Calcium Kit (Molecular Devices), in buffer supplemented with 5 mM probenecid
(Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37˚C. Changes in fluorescence due to intracellular Ca2+ mobilization
(λex = 340 nm, λex = 380 nm; λem = 540 nm) were measured using a calcium imaging plate
reader system (FDSS7000EX, Hamamatsu) every second after the establishment of a baseline.
The agonist Ca2+ peak in response to agonist addition occurred from 10 to 20 s following
stimulation.
Statistics
Data were adjusted to non-linear fitting using Prism V2.1 software (Graph Pad Inc., Chicago,
USA). Ki values were calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Bruce K. Cassels.
Formal analysis: Miguel Toro-Sazo, Marta Cimadevila.
Funding acquisition: Bruce K. Cassels.
Investigation: Miguel Toro-Sazo, Marta Cimadevila.
Project administration: Bruce K. Cassels.
´
Supervision: Jose Brea, Marıa I. Loza, Bruce K. Cassels.
´
Writing – original draft: Bruce K. Cassels.
´
Writing – review & editing: Jose Brea, Marıa I. Loza, Bruce K. Cassels.
´
References
1. Berger M, Gray JA, Roth BL. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu Rev Med 2009; 60: 355−366.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.042307.110802 PMID: 19630576.
2. Tan L, Yan W, McCorvy JD, Cheng J. Biased ligands of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): Struc-
ture-functional selectivity relationships (SFSRs) and therapeutic potential. J Med Chem 2018 Jul 10
[Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00435 PMID: 29939744.
3. Hoyer D, Hannon JP, Martin GR. (2002) Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT
receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002; 71: 533–554. PMID: 11888546.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
18 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
4. Nichols DE. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 2016; 68: 264–355. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011478
PMID: 26841800.
¨
5. Preller KH, Herdener M, Pokorny T, Planzer A, Kraehenmann R, Stampfli P, et al. The fabric of meaning
and subjective effects in LSD-induced states depend on serotonin 2A receptor activation. Curr Biol
2017; 27: 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.003 PMID: 28132813.
6. Hutcheson JD, Setola V, Roth BL, Merryman WD. Serotonin receptors and heart valve disease—it was
meant 2B. Pharmacol Ther 2011; 132: 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.03.008
PMID: 21440001.
7. Higgins GA, Fletcher PJ. Therapeutic Potential of 5-HT2C Receptor Agonists for Addictive Disorders.
ACS Chem Neurosci 2015; 6: 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00025 PMID:
25870913.
8. Shimada I, Maeno K, Kondoh Y, Kaku H, Sugasawa K, Kimura Y, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity
relationships of a series of benzazepine derivatives as 5-HT2C receptor agonists. Bioorg Med Chem
2008; 16: 3309–3320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2007.12.009 PMID: 18083579.
9. Pogorelov VM, Rodriguiz RM, Cheng J, Huang M, Schmerberg CM Meltzer HY, et al. 5-HT2C Agonists
modulate schizophrenia-like behaviors in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017; 42: 2163–2177.
https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.52 PMID: 28294132.
´
´
´
´
10. Garcıa-Carceles J, Decara JM, Vazquez-Villa H, Rodrıguez R, Codesido E, Cruces J, et al. A positive
allosteric modulator of the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor for obesity. J Med Chem 2017; 60: 9575–9584.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00994 PMID: 29116785.
´
11. Glennon RA, Dukat M, El-Bermawy M, Law H, De Los Angeles J, Teitler M, et al. Influence of amine
substitutents on 5-HT2A versus 5-HT2C binding of phenylalkyl- and indolylalkylamines. J Med Chem
1994; 37: 1929–1935. PMID: 8027974.
12. Heim R. Synthese und Pharmakologie potenter 5-HT2A Rezeptoragonisten mit N-2-Methoxybenzyl-
¨
Partialstruktur. Entwicklung eines neuen Struktur-Wirkungskonzepts. Ph.D. Thesis, Freie Universitat
Berlin. 2003. Extensively cited in Silva et al. 2011 [14].
13. Braden MR, Parrish JC, Naylor JC, Nichols DE. Molecular interaction of serotonin 5-HT2A receptor resi-
dues Phe339(6.51) and Phe340(6.52) with superpotent N-benzyl phenethylamine agonists. Mol Pharma-
col 2006, 70: 1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.028720 PMID: 17000863.
14. Silva ME, Heim R, Strasser A, Elz S, Dove S. Theoretical studies on the interaction of partial agonists
with the 5-HT2A receptor. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2011; 25: 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-
010-9400-2 PMID: 21088982.
15. Juncosa JI Jr, Hansen M, Bonner LA, Cueva JP, Maglathlin R, McCorvy JD, et al. Extensive rigid ana-
logue design maps the binding conformation of potent N-benzylphenethylamine 2-HT2A receptor ago-
nist ligands. ACS Chem Neurosci 2013; 4: 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn3000668 PMID:
23336049.
¨
16. Hansen M, Phonekeo K, Paine JS, Leth-Petersen S, Begtrup M, Brauner-Osborne H, et al. Synthesis
and structure-activity relationships of N-benzylphenethylamines as 5-HT2A/2C agonists. ACS Chem
Neurosci 2014; 5: 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn400216u PMID: 24397362.
¨
17. Hansen M, Jacobsen SE, Plunkett S, Liebscher GE, McCorvy JD, Brauner-Osborne H, et al. Synthesis
and pharmacological evaluation of N-benzyl substituted 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines as 5-
HT2A/2C partial agonists. Bioorg Med Chem 2015; 23: 3933–3937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.
12.011 PMID: 25583099.
18. Rickli A, Luethi D, Reinisch J, Buchy D, Hoener MC, Liechti M. Receptor interaction profiles of novel N-
2-methoxybenzyl (NBOMe) derivatives of 2,5-dimethoxy-substituted phenethylamines (2C drugs).
Neuropharmacology 2015; 99: 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.08.034 PMID:
26318099.
19. Nichols DE, Sassano MF, Halberstadt AL, Klein LM, Brandt SD, Elliott SP, et al. N-Benzyl-5-methoxy-
tryptamines as potent serotonin 5-HT receptor family agonists and comparison with a series of phe-
nethylamine analogues. ACS Chem Neurosci 2015; 6: 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500292d
PMID: 25547199.
20. Eshleman AJ, Wolfrum KM, Reed JF, Kim SO, Johnson RA, Janowsky A. Neurochemical pharmacol-
ogy of psychoactive substituted N-benzylphenethylamines: High potency agonists at 5-HT2A receptors.
Biochem Pharmacol 2018; 158: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2018.09.024 PMID: 30261175.
21. Jensen N. Tryptamines as ligands and modulators of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and the isolation of
aeruginascin from the hallucinogenic mushroom Inocybe aeruginascens. Ph.D. Thesis, Georg-August-
¨
Universitat Gottingen. 2004.
¨
22. Wang C, Jiang Y, Ma J, Wu H, Wacker D, Katritch V, et al. Structural basis for molecular recognition at
serotonin receptors. Science 2013; 340: 610–614. https://doi.org/10.1226/science.1232807 PMID:
23519210.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
19 / 20

N-Benzyltryptamines and 5-HT2 receptors
23. Peng Y, McCorvy JD, Harpsøe K, Lansu K, Yuan S, Popov P, et al. 5-HT2C receptor structures reveal
the structural basis of GPCR polypharmacology. Cell 2018; 172: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.
2018.01.001 PMID: 29398112.
24. Wacker D, Wang C, Katritch V, Han GW, Huang XP, Vardy E, et al. Structural features for functional
selectivity at serotonin receptors. Science 2013; 340: 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.
1232808 PMID: 23519215.
25. Halberstadt AL. Pharmacology and toxicology of N-benzylphenethylamine (“NBOMe”) hallucinogens.
In: Baumann MH, Glennon RA, Wiley JL, editors. Current Topics in Behavioral Neuroscience Vol 32,
Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS). Basel: Springer Nature; 2017. pp. 283–
311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52444-3.
26. Tirapegui C, Toro-Sazo MA, Cassels BK. Synthesis of N-(halogenated) benzyl analogs of superpotent
serotonin ligands. J Chil Chem Soc 2014; 59: 2625–2627. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-
97072014000300022.
27. Rickli A, Moning OD, Hoener MC, Liechti ME. Receptor interaction profiles of novel psychoactive trypt-
amines compared with classic hallucinogens. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2016; 26: 1327–1337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.05.001 PMID: 27216487.
´
´
28. Moya PR, Berg KA, Gutierrez-Hernandez MA, Saez-Briones P, Reyes-Parada M, Cassels BK, et al.
Functional selectivity of hallucinogenic phenethylamine and phenylisopropylamine derivatives at
human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007; 321: 1054–
1061. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.117507 PMID: 17337633.
´
29. Martı-Solano M, Iglesias A, de Fabritiis G, Sanz F, Brea J, Loza MI, et al. Detection of new biased ago-
nists for the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor: modeling and experimental validation. Mol Pharmacol 2015; 87:
740–746. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.114.097022 PMID: 25661038.
´
30. Acuña-Castillo C, Villalobos C, Moya PR, Saez P, Cassels BK, Huidobro-Toro JP. Differences in
potency and efficacy of a series of phenylisopropylamine/ phenylethylamine pairs at 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT
(2C) receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2002; 136: 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704747 PMID:
12055129.
31. Roth BL, Choudhary MS, Khan N, Uluer AZ. High-affinity agonist binding is not sufficient for agonist effi-
cacy at 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptors: evidence in favor of a modified ternary complex model. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 280: 576–583. PMID: 9023266.
32. Luethi D, Liechti ME. Monoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles in vitro predict reported
human doses of novel psychoactive stimulants and psychedelics. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2018;
21: 926–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy047 PMID: 29850881.
33. Smith BM, Smith JM, Tsai JH, Schultz JA, Gilson CA, Estrada SA, et al. Discovery and structure-activity
relationship of (1R)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-methyl-1H-3-benzazepine (Lorcaserin), a selective
serotonin 5-HT2C receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity. J Med Chem 2008; 51: 305–313. https://
doi.org/10.1021/jm0709034 PMID: 18095642.
34. Federal Register (2012) https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/12/19/2012-30531/schedules-of-
controlled-substances-placement-of-lorcaserin-into-schedule-iv.
35. Thomsen WJ, Grottick AJ, Menzaghi F, Reyes-Saldana H, Espitia S, Yuskin D, et al. Lorcaserin, a
novel selective human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C agonist: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characteri-
zation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 325: 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.133348 PMID:
18252809.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209804 January 10, 2019
20 / 20