Organic Letters
Letter
a
extended anilines with N,N-diprotection. To date, there is no
report for coupling of the aryl C−N bond in simple NH-
containing anilines in the absence of a directing group.
Table 1. Reaction Development
Direct aryl C−N bond cleavage of mono-protected anilines
(ArNHR) is know to face several challenges. First, a formidable
enthalpy barrier is encountered.10 Second, because of the
presence of a free amine (NH) group, mono-protected anilines
are prone to amination under metal catalysis.19 To solve these
problems, we anticipated to introduce an electron-withdrawing
protecting group onto the nitrogen of aniline. First, this type of
protecting group would weaken the intrinsic bond strength of
the aryl C−N bond. Second, due to the acidity of the NH being
increased by the electron-withdrawing protecting group, the
corresponding amido salt would be formed easily in the
presence of a suitable deprotonation reagent. Then, the aryl C−
N bond might be further activated by the formation of amido
salt. In addition, the amido anion has a good σ-donor ability,
which may bind to the metal catalyst to activate the aryl C−N
bond. Thus, the selective cleavage of the aryl C−N bond of
simple anilines in the absence of a directing group would be
achieved. Based on this strategy, we report herein the first
nondirected aryl C−N bond cleavage of mono-protected
anilines under mild NHC−nickel catalysis (Scheme 1d).
We started the research by investigating the aryl C−N bond
cleavage of trifluoromethanesulfonyl (Tf) protected p-toluidine
1a under nickel catalysis. With PhMgBr 2 as both a coupling
and deprotonation reagent, a trace amount of desired biaryl
product 3 was observed with Ni(PCy3)2Cl2 as catalyst and
toluene and THF as mixed solvent at 130 °C (Table 1, entry 1;
for details, see Table S1 in Supporting Information). Different
ligands were then tested, and 3 was obtained in 24% yield with
N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) precursor ICy·HCl (Table 1,
entry 2). The yield of 3 was increased to 30% when switching
the mixed solvent to toluene/nBu2O (Table 1, entry 3). Further
improvement was observed when the NHC precursor
benzimidazolium salt (L1) was employed, which gave rise to
the desired product 3 in 67% yield (Table 1, entry 4). Then,
new NHC ligands L2−8 were designed and synthesized by
modification of the ligand L1 with assembly of a methyl, tert-
butyl, or phenyl group at its 4-, 5-, 6-, and/or 7-position to
enhance the σ-donor ability of the ligand. After screening these
new NHC ligands, we found that ligand L7 with a methyl group
at 4-position improved the yield of 3 to 78% (Table 1, entry
10). Subsequently, an attempt to lower the dosage of Grignard
reagent to 3 equiv led to a significant decrease in the yield of
product 3 (Table 1, entry 12). However, when 2 equiv of
MeMgBr were used as an additive, product 3 was obtained in
65% yield with 3 equiv of PhMgBr (Table 1, entry 13). The
yield was not improved by addition of a catalytic amount of
organic base, such as DABCO (Table 1, entry 14). A further
increase of the reaction scale and evaluation of the reaction
temperature showed that the yield of 3 was improved to 86%
with 0.2 mmol of 1a at 70 °C (Table 1, entry 16). Finally, 3 was
obtained in 82% yield with Ni(cod)2 as the catalyst precursor,
indicating that an active NHC-Ni(0) catalyst may exit in the
catalytic cycle (Table 1, entry 17).
b
Entry
Ligand
Additive (x equiv)
T (°C) Yield (%)
c
1
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
70
trace
24
30
67
57
6
17
6
16
78
68
8
65
66
84
86
82
c
2
ICy·HCl
ICy·HCl
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L7
L7
L7
L7
L7
L7
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
d
12
d
13
MeMgBr (2)
MeMgBr (2), DABCO (0.25)
d
14
e
15
−
−
−
e
16
e f
,
17
70
a
All reactions were carried out with 1a (0.1 mmol) and 2 (0.5 mmol)
if otherwise noted. Determined by GC with n-dodecane as an
b
c
internal standard. With toluene/THF (1 mL/1 mL) as solvent.
d
e
f
With 2 (0.3 mmol). With 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol). With
Ni(cod)2 (10 mol %) as catalyst.
a
Scheme 2. N-Substituent Effect on the Anilines
a
Conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), Ni(PCy3)2Cl2 (10 mol %),
L7 (15 mol %), toluene/nBu2O (1 mL/1 mL), 70 °C, 12 h, and the
yield was determined by GC with n-dodecane as an internal standard.
Then, we investigated different protecting groups on the
nitrogen of 4-methylaniline in this Ni-catalyzed nondirected
C−N cleavage/C−C cross-coupling reaction (Scheme 2). It
comes as no surprise that no reaction occurred with N-methyl
aniline 1b. A lower yield was observed with N-pivaloyl or N-
pivalate protected 4-methylaniline as substrate (1c and 1d).
However, no reaction occurred with aniline bearing a N-
methanesulfonyl or N- benzenesulfonyl group on the nitrogen
(1e and 1f). When we used the N-Me-N-Tf-aniline 1g as
substrate, 3 was obtained in 35%yield. These results suggest
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX