P. Furet et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1331–1334
1333
placed in position 5. Hence, compounds 3 and 4 were
synthesized, followed by compounds 5–10 in which
combinations of methoxy substituents simultaneously
targeting two or three of residues Ser 151, Ser 157 and
Tyr 135 were incorporated. The relative potencies of
compounds 4, 6, 7 and 10 show that this strategy was
quite successful with the 3-methoxy substitution. The
gain in potency obtained with 4 compared to 2 and with
7 compared to 4 suggests that the targeted hydrogen
bonds with Ser 157 and Tyr 135 were achieved. In
agreement with our concept, the most potent compound
of the series 10 resulted from the addition of a third
methoxy group in position 4 targeting Ser 151. In con-
trast, no beneficial effect was observed with the 2-methoxy
substitution. In the mono-substituted variation, com-
pound 3 is not more active than the unsubstituted com-
pound 2 while the di- and tri-substituted derivatives 5, 8
and 9 are equipotent to their analogues lacking the
2-substituent: 1 and 6. A careful examination of the
model suggests that in order to form a hydrogen bond
with Ser 157, the 2-methoxy group has to come to a short
distance of the C-terminal phenolic moiety of the inhibitor
which occupies the S1 pocket. Thus, in this case an intra-
molecular steric hindrance may cancel out any beneficial
effect obtained by forming a hydrogen bond with Ser 157.
Figure 2. Model of proteasome-compound 18 complex. Hydrogen
bonds are indicated as magenta lines.
The modifications introduced in compound 1 had no
effect on its 20S proteasome speficity profile. The highly
potent derivatives 16–18 still show good selectivity over
the trypsin-like and post-glutamyl-peptide hydrolytic
activities of the 20S proteasome (for all compounds,
IC50>20 mM).
In summary, our model of the human 20S proteasome
in conjunction with a modular chemistry approach has
allowed us to improve the proteasome chymotrypsin-
like inhibitory activity of the 2-aminobenzylstatine
compound class from micromolar down to nanomolar
potency. The reported compounds are the most potent
non-covalent inhibitors of the human proteasome
described to date.15 They open a new avenue for further
investigation of the proteasome as a therapeutic target
in oncology.
Parallel to our efforts to establish hydrogen bond inter-
actions, we explored the possibility to enhance potency
by creating additional van der Waals interactions in the
S3 pocket. The hydrocarbon parts of the side chains of
Gln 159 and Lys 164 were the most appropriate protein
atoms to target in this respect according to the model.
Compounds 11–14 were synthesized following this con-
cept. For analogues 11 and 13, we were counting on
some flexibility of the residues of the bottom of the
pocket since in the model their bulky 4-substituents
were causing a few steric clashes. The lack of activity of
these analogues put in perspective with the substantial
potency of 12, which bears a smaller isopropyl group,
clearly defines the tolerance of the S3 pocket in terms of
the size of the substituent in position 4. The higher
potency of 14 compared to 12 can be ascribed to the
ability of the dimethylamino susbstituent to form a
hydrogen bond with Ser 151 in addition to making
hydrophobic contacts with Gln 159 and Lys 164.
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Arz, R. Wille, V. von Arx, V. Huy Luu, J. M.
Groell, W. Beck and E. Boss for technical assistance.
References and Notes
1. Tanaka, K. J. Biochem. 1998, 123, 195.
2. Orlowski, M.; Cardozo, C.; Michaud, C. Biochemistry
1993, 32, 1563.
A key finding of our earlier work was the fact that
replacement of the benzyloxycarbonyl group of com-
pound 1 by a group derived from the coupling of
naphthalen-1-yl-acetic acid at the N-terminus improved
potency by one order of magnitude (see compound 15 in
Table 1).5 This modification was designed to increase
the strength of a postulated stacking interaction of the
N-terminal group with residue Tyr 133 of subunit HC5
which forms a small accessory hydrophobic pocket
together with Tyr 33 and Pro 131.6 Consistent with this
finding, we observed an increase in potency of similar
magnitude when the same modification was introduced
in compounds 8–10 and 14 to give derivatives 16–18 and
19. Thus, with an IC50 value of 7 nM, 18 turned out to
be the most potent compound of the series reported in
this study. A model of its complex with the X/HC5 site
of the proteasome is shown in Figure 2.
3. For recent reviews on this target and 20S proteasome inhi-
bitors, see: (a) Rivett, A. J.; Gardner, R. C. J. Pept. Sci. 2000,
6, 478. (b) Dou, Q. P.; Nam, S. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2000, 10,
1263. (c) Adams, J.; Palombella, V. J.; Elliott, P. J. Invest. New
Drugs 2000, 18, 109. (d) Murray, R. Z.; Norbury, C. Anti-
Cancer Drugs 2000, 11, 407. (e) Dou, Q. P.; Li, B. Drug Resist.
Updates 1999, 2, 215. (f) Elliott, P. J.; Adams, J. Curr. Opin.
Drug. Disc. Dev. 1999, 2, 484. (g) Kalogeris, T.; Gray, L.;
Laroux, F. S.; Cockrell, A.; Fuseler, J.; Conner, E. M.; Brand,
S.; Grisham, M. B. Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 1999, 8, 1397. (h)
Lee, D. H.; Goldberg, A. L. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8, 397.
4. A dipeptide boronic acid analogue (PS-341) is currently
under clinical evaluation in advanced cancer patients. For
additional data on this compound, see: Adams, J.; Palombella,
V. J.; Sausville, E. A.; Johnson, J.; Destree, A.; Lazarus, D. D.;
Maas, J.; Pien, C. S.; Prakash, S.; Elliott, P. J. Cancer Res.
1999, 59, 2615.