2
Tetrahedron
The synthesis of (7S,8S,12S)-1 is shown in Scheme 4. Both
ketone and hydroxy group of 5 were protected by treatment with
TBSOTf/Et3N. Reduction of the ester with DIBAL followed by
acidic hydrolysis of silyl enol ether afforded 4 in good yield
(78% from 5). The mild oxidation of furan-ring in 4 was
successfully performed by treatment with NBS in MeOH at 0 °C
to give 15, which was directly transacetalized under acidic
conditions to furnish the key intermediate
3 in almost
quantitative yield. Although compound 3 was an anomeric
mixture (3:3 = 2:1), this mixture was used for the next step
without purification.9
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the intermediates 6 and 7. Reagents and conditions:
(a) Br2, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h, then Et3N, CH2Cl2, 1 h, 77%; (b) 1,3-dithiane, n-
BuLi, Mg(OTf)2 (20 mol%), Et2O, 0 °C, 2 h, 88%; (c) HIO4•2H2O, THF/Et2O,
0 °C to rt, 30 min, 97%; (d) (COCl)2, cat. DMF, CH2Cl2, reflux, 1.5 h, then 12,
n-BuLi, Et2O, −78 °C to rt, 1 h, 80%.
With two units 6 and 7 in hand, aldol reaction between 6 and 7
was investigated (Scheme 3). In our early-phased studies, we
found that the anti-type aldol adduct was preferable to the syn-
adduct for the key intramolecular cyclization (3→2). This might
be due to the steric hindrance caused by the C6 substituent. Thus,
Mg-mediated asymmetric anti-aldol conditions reported by
Evans et al.7 were applied. However, in this reaction, the
diastereoselectivity was not observed, whereas the anti-
selectivity was perfect. The resulting diastereomeric mixture of
13 and 14 was separated by column chromatography to afford 13
(29%) and 14 (50%), respectively. This result was not expected
but allowed us to synthesize both enantiomers of 1 from 13 and
14. The removal of chiral auxiliary of 13 and 14 was performed
by treatment with NaOMe to give 5 (91%) and ent-5 (73%),
respectively. The enantiomeric exesses of both enantiomers were
estimated to be >99% ee by HPLC analysis. The absolute
configuration of 5 was determined by the modified Mosher’s
method.8
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (7S,8S,12S)- and (7R,8R,12R)-1. Reagents and
conditions: (a) TBSOTf, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, overnight; (b) DIBAL,
CH2Cl2, −78 °C, 3 h (c) dil. HCl, THF, rt, 5 h, 78% for three steps; (d) NBS,
MeOH, 0 °C, 15 min; (e) p-TsOH•H2O, MeCN, rt, 10 min, 95% in two steps,
3:3 = 2:1; (f) Ni(COD)2, Mg(OTf)2, MeCN, rt, overnight; (g) 3 M HCl,
THF, rt, overnight, 59% in two steps; (h) PDC, MS 4A, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h, 97%.
With the key intermediate 3 in hand, we examined the
intramolecular cyclization. Initially, radical conditions (n-
Bu3SnH/AIBN in refluxing toluene) was applied, but the yield of
the desired product 2 was low (< 30%). It was likely that the
substrate 3 would be unstable under rather harsh conditions.
Because the milder conditions would be suitable for this reaction,
we then investigated transition metal-mediated reductive Heck-
type cyclization. Pd-mediated conditions were initially attempted,
but the desired 2 was obtained in lower yield (ca. 15%) by
treatment with a catalytic amount of Pd(PPh3)4. After screening
several conditions, the use of a stoichiometric amount of
Ni(COD)2 in MeCN10 led to a significant improvement in yield
(57%). Remarkably, in this reaction, 2 was obtained as a single
isomer with -OMe group, even though the substrate was an
anomeric mixture (3/). The orientation of anomeric OMe
group in 3 was considered crucial for the cyclization, and this
kinetic separation should be due to steric hindrance caused by the
-oriented OMe group in 3. Therefore, addition of a Lewis acid
for the activation of the unreactive 3 was attempted. We
examined various mild Lewis acids, e.g., Zn(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3,
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 5 and ent-5. Reagents and conditions: (a) MgBr2•
OEt2, Et3N, TMSCl, EtOAc, rt, 24 h; TFA, MeOH, rt, 1 h; (b) NaOMe,
MeOH, 0 °C, 5 min, 91% for 5, 73% for ent-5.