Purity of Acetoxy-1,8-cineoles in A. galanga
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 2, 1999 687
Ta ble 2. 13C NMR Da ta for Ca r bon s of th e
Hyd r oxy-1,8-cin eole Moiety of (S)-O-Meth ylm a n d ela te
Ester s 1S,R-4S,R (150 MHz, CDCl3, TMS, δ Va lu e)
C
1S
1R
2S
2R
3S
3R
4S
4R
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
70.8
73.7
33.7
32.4
73.3
25.8
21.9
23.6
28.8
28.5
70.7
73.7
33.6
32.2
73.5
26.0
21.7
24.2
28.8
28.5
70.8
73.7
33.2
32.3
73.9
29.6
21.7
22.5
27.9
28.8
70.6
73.6
33.0
31.7
73.5
29.5
21.7
23.0
27.5
28.8
70.3
73.2
36.9
70.4
39.7
30.7
14.4
26.9
28.6
28.4
70.4
73.2
37.1
70.4
39.7
30.6
14.8
26.8
28.7
28.4
69.9
72.9
37.4
73.5
40.1
30.0
21.0
26.7
30.1
30.0
69.9
72.9
37.5
73.7
39.9
30.0
21.0
26.6
30.4
30.1
a
The structures should be referred to Figure 2.
F igu r e 2. Structures of (S)-(+)-O-methylmandelate esters of
2- and 3-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles. For the numbering, the legend
of Figure 1 should be referred to. Absolute configurations of
each compound are as follows: 1S (1S,4R,6S); 1R (1R,4S,6R),
2S (1R,4S,6S); 2R (1S,4R,6R); 3S (1R,4S,5S); 3R (1S,4R,5R);
4S (1S,4R,5S); 4R (1R,4S,5R).
F igu r e 1. Structures of 2- and 3-acetoxy-1,8-cineoles. The
common names and the systematic names are as follows: 1a ,
trans-2-acetoxy-1,8-cineole (trans-1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo-
[2.2.2]oct-6-yl acetate); 2a , cis-2-acetoxy-1,8-cineole (cis-1,3,3-
trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-6-yl acetate); 3a , trans-3-
acetoxy-1,8-cineole (trans-1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-
5-yl acetate); 4a , cis-3-acetoxy-1,8-cineole (cis-1,3,3-trimethyl-
2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-yl acetate). Each acetoxy-1,8-cineole
has two optical isomers, and one of them is shown here. The
absolute configuration is indicated in parentheses. The num-
bering corresponds to the systematic name.
of C-10 and -11 enhanced Ha of C-8 and CH of C-4 and
C-5 by NOEDF, which showed that Hb was eclipsed by
phenyl ring more than Ha in C-8. Actually in NMR, the
shielding by the phenyl ring at CH of C-4 and at Ha
and Hb of C-8 was observed and the shifted value of
Hb of C-8 was highest in 3S. On the other hand, in 3R,
CH3 of C-9 and Hb of C-6 and C-7 were shielded. Among
them Hb of C-6 was shifted most to upfield, and it
agreed with the result of NOESY, in which Hb was not
enhanced with the irradiation of the methyne proton of
C-5. The structures of 3S and 3R were thus established
to be those of the (S)-O-methylmandelate of (1R,4S,5S)-
and (1S,4R,5R)-1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-
5-ol, respectively, as shown in Figure 2. Similarly, it was
observed that CH of C-4 and the methyl protons of both
of C-10 and -11 in 4S and Ha of C-6 in 4R were shielded
by the phenyl ring. The NOEDF experiments supported
these results well, where CH of C-4 and Ha of C-6 were
enhanced by the irradiation of CH3 of C-10 in 4S and
Ha of C-6 and CH of C-4 were enhanced by the
irradiation of methyl protons of C-10 and -11 in 4R.
Therefore, 4S and 4R were determined to be the (S)-O-
methylmandelate of (1S,4R,5S)- and (1R,4S,5R)-1,3,3-
trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-5-ol, respectively. In
the 13C NMR spectra shown in Table 2, there was little
variation in chemical shift between the esters of each
enantiomeric alcohol, but some difference of the profile
was observed between cis-trans isomers or positional
isomers of the alcohol moiety.
extended Newman projection in which the intervening
ester linkage is omitted is always upfield as a result of
its shielding by the phenyl ring. As shown in Figure 2,
with compound 1S, this group involves the methyl
protons of C-9 and methylene protons of C-7, and in the
enantiomeric alcohol which corresponds to diastereomer
1R, this group incorporates Hb of C-5, with Hb of C-8
also being shielded. In the NOEDF experiment of 1R,
the enhancement of CH of C-4 and -6 and Ha of C-5
was observed by the irradiation of methyl proton of
C-10. As is shown in Table 1, the δ values of the
corresponding protons are shifted to upfield which are
in good agreement with this theoretical model. From
these results, the absolute structures of 1S and 1R were
determined to be those of the (S)-O-methylmandelate
of (1S,4R,6S)- and (1R,4S,6R)-1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxa-
bicyclo[2.2.2]octan-6-ol, respectively. Similarly in 2S, the
CH3 protons of C-9 were shielded. In 2R, the CH3
protons of C-10, CH of C-4, and Ha and Hb of C-5 were
shielded clearly. The enhancement of Ha of C-5 and -8
and the methyne proton of C-4 in 2R was observed by
the irradiation of methyl protons of C-10 by NOEDF.
These results explained that Ha of C-5 and the methyl
protons of C-10 were in the same direction which lay
close to phenyl ring in space and their δ values were
shifted more than others in 2R. The structures of 2S and
2R were thus established to be those of the (S)-O-
methylmandelate of (1R,4S,6S)- and (1S,4R,6R)-1,3,3-
trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-6-ol, respectively. The
Mosher theory was also applied to the 3-hydroxy-1,8-
cineole group. In 3S, the irradiation of methyl protons
Deter m in a tion of th e En a n tiom er ic P u r ity. Each
mandelate ester was reduced with LiAlH4 to obtain the
corresponding optically pure alcohol. After extraction of
the alcohol without additional purification, the alcohol
was acetylated with acetic anhydride in dry pyridine
and submitted to GC-MS analysis. The enantiomers