Fig. 2 Selected bond lengths of (a) 1·4DMF, in which the two ligands are related by a C2 axis and (b) the cation of [1][BF4]·2CH2Cl2 containing LA and LB
(values for the latter are given in parentheses).
structural information is taken to indicate that [1]+ contains both
a phenoxyl radical (LA = L·) and a phenolate (LB = L2) ligand
coordinated to CuII; i.e. [1]+ is constituted as [Cu2+(L·)(L2)]+.
Thus, the oxidation of a phenolate ligand in 1 to a phenoxyl
group in [1]+ is accompanied by a shortening of the C–O bond
and a lengthening of the Cu–O bond. This observation is
consistent with the structural information obtained11 for a
complex of CrIII that contains one phenoxyl radical and two
phenolate ligands, in which the C–O distance in the phenoxyl
radical is 1.290(4) Å. The C–O distance of LA is 1.264(5) Å,
emphasising the CNO character of this bond. The length of the
C–O and C–C bonds of LA, in comparison with those of LB and
the phenolate ligands of 1, are in accord with an electronic
structure described by the two resonance forms of Fig. 3, i.e. the
unpaired electron of the phenoxyl group is delocalised over both
ortho positions.
[1][BF4]·2CH2Cl2 have been crucial to this assignment12 and
the UV–VIS, EPR and magnetic susceptibility data recorded for
[1][BF4] provide additional and independent support for this
proposal. This study represents the first structural character-
isation of a phenoxyl radical bound to CuII, a chemical
combination that is crucial for the catalytic activity of GAO and
GLO.
We thank the EPSRC and The University of Nottingham for
the provision of a studentship (to L. B.) and Dr F. E. Mabbs for
valuable discussions.
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for [1][BF4]·2CH2Cl2: C60H66N4O2BF4Cl4Cu, dark green
square plate, M = 1167.3, monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 12.6062(7),
b = 18.2942(10), c = 25.5061(14) Å, b = 96.191(1)°, V = 5847.9(9) Å3,
Z = 4, Dc = 1.326 g cm23, T = 150(2) K, F(000) = 2432, m(Mo-Ka) =
0.61 mm21, 40636 reflections collected, 14159 unique (Rint = 0.053). The
final agreement factors are R1 = 0.068 for 8068 data with F > 4s(F) and R1
= 0.125, wR2 = 0.189 for 13749 data. The CH2Cl2, BF4 and one tBu group
exhibited disorder which, in each case, was modelled over two sites with
suitable geometric restraints applied. CCDC reference numbers 167603 and
graphic data in CIF or other electronic format.
1 J. W. Whittaker, in Metal Ions in Biological Systems, ed. H. Sigel and A.
Sigel, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994, vol. 30, pp. 315–360.
2 J. P. Klinman, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2541.
3 N. Ito, S. E. V. Phillips, C. Stevens, Z. B. Ogel, M. J. McPherson, J. N.
Keen, K. D. S. Yadav and P. F. Knowles, Nature, 1991, 350, 87; N. Ito,
S. E. V. Phillips, K. D. S. Yadav and P. F. Knowles, J. Mol. Biol., 1994,
238, 794.
Fig. 3 Resonance forms of L· in [Cu2+(L·)(L2)][BF4].
4 M. M. Whittaker, P. J. Kersten, N. Nakamura, J. Sanders-Loehr, E. S.
Schweizer and J. W. Whittaker, J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271, 681; M. M.
Whittaker, P. J. Kersten, D. Cullen and J. W. Whittaker, J. Biol. Chem.,
1999, 274, 36 226.
5 J. Stubbe and W. A. van der Donk, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 705.
6 A. J. Baron, C. Stevens, C. Wilmot, K. D. Seneviratne, V. Blakeley,
D. M. Dooley, S. E. V. Phillips, P. F. Knowles and M. J. McPherson,
J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269, 25 095; P. F. Knowles, R. D. Brown, S. H.
Koenig, S. Wang, R. A. Scott, M. A. McGuirl, D. E. Brown and D. M.
Dooley, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 3895; K. Clark, J. E. Penner-Hahn, M.
M. Whittaker and J. W. Whittaker, J. Am. Chem., Soc., 1990, 112,
6433.
7 M. M. Whittaker and J. M. Whittaker, Biophys. J., 1993, 64, 762; M. M.
Whittaker, D. P. Ballou and J. W. Whittaker, Biochemistry, 1998, 37,
8426; B. P. Branchaud, M. P. Montague-Smith, D. J. Kosman and F. R.
McLaren, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 798; R. M. Wachter and B. P.
Branchaud, Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 14 425; R. M. Wachter, M. P.
Montague-Smith and B. P. Branchaud, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
7743.
8 S. Itoh, M. Taki and S. Fukuzumi, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 198, 3.
9 B. A. Jazdzewski and W. B. Tolman, Coord. Chem. Rev, 2000, 200,
633.
1 and [1][BF4] display identical cyclic voltammograms in
CH2Cl2 and the UV–VIS spectrum of [1][BF4] is the same as
that obtained for [1]+ generated electrochemically. The OTTLE
spectra, (Fig. S2, ESI†) recorded for the oxidation of 1 in
CH2Cl2 at 0 °C show that this process produces an absorption at
410 nm that is assigned to a p–p* transition of the phenoxyl
radical (L) bound to CuII.8,9
The EPR spectrum of 1 in CH2Cl2–toluene (9+1) at 116 K,
(Fig. S3, ESI†) is typical of a rhombic Cu(II) (S = 1/2, I = 3/2)
1
2
1
2
complex with a (dx 2y ) (or (dxy) ) ground state: gxx = 2.053,
gyy = 2.047, gzz = 2.253. In contrast, [1][BF4] in CH2Cl2 at
77 K at X-band over the range 0–6000 G was found to be
essentially EPR silent. The temperature dependence (3–320 K)
of the magnetic susceptibility of [1][BF4] (Fig. S4, ESI†) has
been modelled by the Hamiltonian
H
=
22JSCuSrad,
where J = 26.1 cm21 and SCu = Srad = 1/2, gCu = 2.12, grad
= 2.00. [1][BF4] possesses a diamagnetic ground state (S = 0)
that is considered to arise from an antiferromagnetic coupling
between the unpaired electron of the Cu(II) and the unpaired
electron of the coordinated phenoxyl radical, L·.
10 E. R. Altwicker, Chem. Rev., 1967, 67, 475.
11 A. Sokolowski, E. Bothe, E. Bill, T. Weyhermüller and K. Wieghardt,
Chem. Commun., 1996, 1671.
12 P. Chaudhuri, C. N. Verani, E. Bill, E. Bothe, T. Weyhermüller and K.
Wieghardt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 2213.
Thus, oxidation of [CuL2] is ligand-based and produces a
cation that is constituted as [Cu2+(L·)(L2)]+, involving CuII
bound to both a phenoxyl radical (L·) and a phenolate (L2)
ligand. The crystallographic information obtained for
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1824–1825
1825