an efficient, stereocontrolled synthesis of the common C(7-
19) tricyclic spiroketal fragment (+)-4.
From the retrosynthetic perspective, we envisioned 4 to
arise via an acid-catalyzed 6-endo cyclization of an epoxy-
ketone (5) to assemble the C(8-12) tetrahydropyran with
the required relative stereochemistry (Scheme 1); subsequent
the epoxide. Thus, unsaturation at C(13,14), as introduced
by Nicolaou,7 would serve to maximize the regioselectivity
in the ring formation. Reduction of the olefin would then be
followed by stereoselective spiroketalization; the requisite
stereogenicity of the C(15) spiroketal was anticipated on the
basis of the anomeric effect8 and previous experience in our
laboratory.4 Control of the relative configuration of the C(16)
methyl substituent however was far less certain.9 With this
as rationale, R,â-unsaturated ketone 5 was selected to be the
precursor for 4. Continuing with this analysis, ketone 5 would
arise via a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) condensa-
tion between phosphonate 6 and epoxy-aldehyde 7, followed
by removal of the silyl protecting groups.
Scheme 1
Our point of departure for the construction of 5 entailed
assembly of epoxy-aldehyde 7 (Scheme 2). Addition of
Scheme 2
allylmagnesium bromide to (R)-4-methoxybenzylglycidyl
ether10 catalyzed by CuI, followed by TBS protection of the
derived alcohol, readily furnished (-)-9 in 83% yield for
the two steps.11 Oxidative cleavage of the terminal olefin,
Wittig olefination with (carbethoxyethylidene)triphenyl-
phosphorane, and DIBAL reduction of the resulting ester then
reduction of the olefin and stereoselective spiroketalization
would then complete the tricyclic fragment.5 To overcome
the inherent stereoelectronic constraints of the initial tet-
rahydropyran construction (i.e., 6-endo vs 5-exo cyclization),6
we recognized the need for cationic stabilization adjacent to
(6) In general, 5-exo cyclization is favored geometrically over 6-endo
cyclization. Baldwin, J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734-
736.
(7) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Duggan, M. E.; Hwang, C.-K.; Somers, P. K. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 1359-1362. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad,
C. V. C.; Somers, P. K.; Hwang, C.-K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5330-
5334.
(8) For reviews of the anomeric effect, see: (a) Deslongchamps, P.
Stereoelectronic Effects in Organic Chemistry; Pergamon Press: New York,
1983. (b) Kirby, A. J. The Anomeric Effect and Related Stereoelectronic
Effects at Oxygen; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1983.
(4) (a) Smith, A. B., III; Hale, K. J.; Vaccaro, H. A.; Rivero, R. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2112-2122 (b) Smith, A. B., III; Friestad, G.
K.; Barbosa, J.; Bertounesque, E.; Hull, K. G.; Iwashima, M.; Qiu, Y.;
Salvatore, B. A.; Spoors, P. G.; Duan, J. J.-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 10468-10477. (c) Smith, A. B., III; Doughty, V. A.; Lin, Q.; Zhuang,
L.; McBriar, M. D.; Boldi, A. M.; Moser, W. H.; Murase, N.; Nakayama,
K.; Sobukawa, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001, 40, 191-195. (d)
Smith, A. B., III; Lin, Q.; Doughty, V. A.; Zhuang, L.; McBriar, M. D.;
Kerns, J. K.; Brook, C. S.; Murase, N.; Nakayama, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 2001, 40, 196-199.
(5) For other methods for the construction of the fused tetrahydropyrans,
see: (a) Rainier, J. D.; Allwein, S. P.; Cox, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
1380-1386 and references therein. (b) Sakamoto, Y.; Matsuo, G.; Mat-
sukura, H.; Nakata, T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2749-2752.
(9) Monte Carlo conformational searches using the MM2 force field
predicted the spiroketal epimeric to 4 at C(16) (i.e., â) to be more stable
by 0.99 kcal/mol (1.49:1 ratio at equilibrium). Both methyl isomers epimeric
at C(15) were predicted to be considerably less stable (ca. 7.7 kcal/mol).
(10) Smith, A. B., III; Zhuang, L.; Brook, C. S.; Boldi, A. M.; McBriar,
M. D.; Moser, W. H.; Murase, N.; Nakayama, K.; Verhoest, P. R.; Lin, Q.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8667-8670.
(11) Interestingly, minor amounts (<10%) of regioisomeric products were
also observed.
3980
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 24, 2001