concerning generation, spectral properties, and structure of
aromatic sulfoxide radical cations.5 More recently, we have
studied the C-S bond fragmentation reactions of species
generated by photooxidation sensitized by 3-cyano-N-meth-
ylquinolinium perchlorate (3-CN-NMQ+).6 A conclusion of the
latter study was that with tertiary and secondary benzylic
systems, a fast unimolecular C-S bond cleavage takes place
leading to the formation of the phenylsulfinyl radical C6H5SO•
and the carbocation R1R2R3C+ (eq 1).
Stereochemistry of the C-S Bond Cleavage in
cis-2-Methylcyclopentyl Phenyl Sulfoxide Radical
Cation
Enrico Baciocchi, Osvaldo Lanzalunga,* Andrea Lapi, and
Laura Maggini
Dipartimento di Chimica and Istituto CNR di Metodologie
Chimiche-IMC, Sezione Meccanismi di Reazione c/o
Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza UniVersita` di Roma,
P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
ReceiVed NoVember 26, 2008
However, direct evidence for the formation of a carbocation
was obtained only when R1 ) H and R2 ) R3 ) Ph. In the
other cases the formation of the cation was only inferred by
product and kinetic studies. Moreover, an intriguing result was
obtained with benzyl phenyl sulfoxide radical cation. The
fragmentation rate of this radical cation (1.1 × 106 s-1) was
very close to that of tert-butyl phenyl sulfoxide radical cation
(1.8 × 106 s-1) despite the fact that the C-S bond dissociation
free energy is about 8.5 kcal mol-1 less negative in the former
than in the second radical cation. Among the possible explana-
tions, it was considered that the cleavage of the primary benzylic
system might be nucleophilically assisted (a bimolecular process
with the solvent XH as the nucleophile, eq 2) without involving
the intermediacy of a benzyl carbocation.
The TiO2 photocatalyzed oxidation of cis-2-methylcyclo-
pentyl phenyl sulfoxide in the presence of Ag2SO4 in MeCN/
H2O leads to the formation of 1-methylcyclopentanol,
1-methylcyclopentyl acetamide, and phenyl benzenethiosul-
fonate as the main reaction products. It is suggested that the
C-S heterolysis in the radical cation is an unimolecular
process leading to an ion radical pair. Fast 1,2-hydride shift
in the secondary carbocation leads to 1-methylcyclopentyl
carbocation that forms the observed products by reaction with
H2O and MeCN. Attack of H2O on the ion radical pair may
also occur, but as a minor route (<3%), with formation of
trans-2-methylcyclopentanol.
Indeed, it is well recognized that in the fragmentation
reactions of radical cations a mechanistic dichotomy is possible
between an unimolecular and a bimolecular pathway which,
when cleavage at carbon is concerned, very closely resembles
that between the SN1 and SN2 mechanisms in the nucleophilic
substitutions at carbon.7 Clearly, the fragmentation of an alkyl
sulfoxide radical cation can be usefully seen as a type of
nucleophilic substitution where the leaving group is the sulfinyl
radical.
Since the nucleophilically assisted fragmentation of a radical
cation is expected to occur with inversion of configuration,8
we considered that further interesting information on the possible
role of a bimolecular pathway in the fragmentation of alkyl
phenyl sulfoxide radical cations might be obtained by a study
of the stereochemistry of the fragmentation process of cis-2-
methylcyclopentyl phenyl sulfoxide radical cation (1+•). Ac-
cordingly, in this case the operation of this pathway should lead
to a trans-2-methylcyclopentyl derivative (path a in Scheme
1), whereas, in the case of an unimolecular process (path b in
Sulfoxides are substrates of great interest for their importance
in organic synthesis as well as for their biological activity and
involvement in the general metabolism of many biologically
important sulfides.1 Despite this, few studies are presently
available for sulfoxide radical cations, although these species
should be of interest given their possible role in oxidative
chemical2 and biochemical transformations.3
To cover this gap, the long-standing interest in the chemistry
of radical cations4 has led our group to investigate aspects
(1) Carreno, M. C. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1717–1760. Fernandez, I.; Khiar,
N. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3651–3705. Clarke, M. J.; Zhu, F.; Frasca, D. R.
Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2511. Lipponer, K. G.; Vogel, E.; Keppler, B. K. Metal
Based Drugs 1996, 3, 243. Caligaris, M.; Carugo, O. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996,
153, 83. Shin, J. M.; Cho, Y. M.; Sachs, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7800–
7811. Legros, J.; Dehli, J. R.; Bolm, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 19–31.
Bentley, R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 609–624.
(2) Adaikalasamy, K.; Venkataramanan, N. S.; Rajagopal, S. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 3613–3619. Ganesan, M.; Sivasubramanian, V. K.; Rajagopal, S.;
Ramaraj, R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1921–1929.
(3) Watanabe, Y.; Iyanagi, T.; Oae, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 533–
536.
(4) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Lanzalunga, O. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 243–
251. Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Lanzalunga, O. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19,
467–478.
(5) Baciocchi, E.; Del Giacco, T.; Gerini, M. F.; Lanzalunga, O. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2006, 110, 9940–9948.
(6) Baciocchi, E.; Del Giacco, T.; Lanzalunga, O.; Mencarelli, P.; Procacci,
B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5675–5682.
(7) (a) Baciocchi, E.; Fasella, E.; Lanzalunga, O.; Mattioli, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1071–1073. (b) Shaik, S.; Reddy, A. C.; Ioffe, A.;
Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Danovich, D.; Cho, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3205.
(8) Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Todd, W. P.; Simpson, T. R.; Gould, I. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2462. (a) Shaik, S.; Dinnocenzo, J. P. J. Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 3434.
10.1021/jo802619y CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 01/15/2009
2009 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1805–1808 1805