Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.4 (2005)
479
1.325
-0081
1.307
O
O2 ,50 K
O
365 nm
O
N
O
N
-0.400
(-0.221)
+
-0.319
(-0.306)
Ar N3
Ar
N
-0.084
-N2
Ar
cis-3
Ar
>590 nm / -O2
(0.071)
O
O
(-0.038)
O
N
O
N
triplet-2
1.288
1
1.283
trans-3
0.346
(-0.002)
Ar
Ar
0.281
365 nm
(0.001)
cis-3
O
N
O
313 or
>400 nm
>415 nm
N
trans-3
Ar
6
O2N
Figure 2. Spin densities, NPA atomic charges (in parentheses),
ꢀ
O (3P)
7
NO
+
NO2
and bond lengths (underlines, A) of 3 calculated at the
UB3LYP/6-31+Gꢀ level of theory. (Ar = 4-nitrophenyl).
Ar
Ar
5
4
O2
O3
diradical characters (Figure 2). Triplet-singlet energy differences
for cis- and trans-3 were calculated as 40.3 and 33.6 kJ molꢁ1
,
Ar =
O2N
respectively. These values indicate that the nitroso oxide popu-
late in their singlet states at 50 K. The vibration frequencies cal-
culated for cis- and trans-3 were compared with experimental
values after scaled by a factor of 0.9614 (Figure 1).6 IR spectrum
observed for X seems to be similar to that calculated for more
stable isomer cis-3. If the experimental spectrum consists of pure
cis-3, band at 1131 cmꢁ1 must be assigned to the C–N–O sym-
metrical stretching mode of the theoretically calculated spec-
trum. The isotopic shift for the C–N–O stretching was calculated
as ꢁ15 cmꢁ1, which is inconsistent with the large isotopic shift
(ꢁ62 cmꢁ1) observed. While, considering that X is a cis/trans
mixture of the nitroso oxide 3, the calculated IR data fairly re-
produce the observed data. Furthermore, theoretical isotopic
shifts for O–O stretching modes of cis-3 (ꢁ54 cmꢁ1) and
trans-3 (ꢁ62 cmꢁ1) are in fair agreement with experimental re-
sults described above. Thus it was concluded that the IR spec-
trum obtained by warming the matrix containing the nitrene 2
and oxygen molecules to 50 K corresponded to cis- and
trans-4-nitronitrosobenzene O-oxide (3). We believe that this
represents the first IR detection of aryl nitroso oxide, although
Laursen et al. observed trans-HNOO formed in the reaction of
NH and O2 in a Xe matrix.7
Although the formation of singlet 3 from triplet 2 and O2 is
spin-allowed and calculated as exothermic of 22.0 kJ molꢁ1, no 3
appeared in O2-doped Ar or Xe matrices at 40 K where O2 mole-
cules could be rapidly diffuse.8 At 50 K, however, 2 reacted with
O2 to give the nitroso oxide 3 as shown above, indicating that
this reaction needs some activation energy. Kinetic control
may explain the presence of trans-3 in spite of the energy differ-
ence (2.5 kJ molꢁ1) between trans-3 and more stable cis-3.
Next, the possible mechanism for the photochemical rear-
rangement of 3 into 4 is discussed. As mentioned in an introduc-
tory part, it was thought that the dioxaziridine may participate in
this type of reaction. Assuming that the dioxaziridine 6 exists as
an intermediate in this reaction process, the energy diagram cal-
culated with the DFT method shows that the energy minimum
structure of 6 (53.5 kJ molꢁ1 above cis-3) lies in a deep potential
well with activation barriers for the paths to cis-3 (109.7 kJ
molꢁ1) and to 4 (96.9 kJ molꢁ1). However, the theoretically cal-
culated bands for 6, which include the cyclic NO2 deformation
band at about 826 cmꢁ1 (18O-isotopic shiht; ꢁ22 cmꢁ1), could
not be detected in the photoreactions of 3, regardless of the ex-
citation at a variety of wavelengths (ꢀ > 590, > 540, > 460,
> 415, or 365 nm). Therefore, we concluded that 6 is not an in-
termediate in the rearrangement of 3 into 4 in the matrix at 10 K.
From the fact that 5 and ozone are observed in this photoreac-
tion, it is predicted that 3 generates an oxygen atom photochemi-
cally. The formation of 4 could be achieved by the attack of
Scheme 1.
atomic oxygen on the nitroso moiety of 5 in matrix cage, though
some of the atomic oxygen were captured by molecular oxygen
to give ozone (Scheme 1). This mechanism could be also sup-
ported by the following experiment. A Xe matrix containing 5
and a large amount of ozone was irradiated (>520 nm) at
10 K, as the photolysis of ozone was known to give atomic oxy-
gen (3P).9 It was observed that 5 was cleanly converted to 4 with-
out any by-products.
Thus, it was found that the photoreaction of 3 with the long-
wavelength light (>590 nm) caused the N–O bond cleavage to
yield 2, and that 4 was produced by the reaction of 5 with
O(3P), which are derived from the photochemical O–O bond
cleavage of 3 with light of >415 nm. At present, a systematic
study for the photoreactions of aryl nitroso oxides using a variety
of aryl azides is in progress.
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology Japan (No. 15750040) and by the
Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science
Society (No. 15-107).
References and Notes
1
a) K. Ishiguro and Y. Sawaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 73, 535 (2000).
b) S. Ishikawa, T. Nojima, and Y. Sawaki, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1996, 127. c) Y. Sawaki and S. Ishikawa, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 109, 584 (1987). d) T.-Y. Liang and G. B. Schuster, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 109, 7803 (1987).
2
a) T. Harder, P. Wessig, J. Bendig, and R. Stosser, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
¨
121, 6580 (1999). b) N. P. Gritsan and E. S. Pritchina, J. Inf. Rec.
Mater., 17, 391 (1989). c) E. A. Pritchina and N. P. Gritsan, J.
Photochem. Photobiol., A, 43, 165 (1988). d) J. S. Brinen and B.
Singh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 6623 (1971).
IR bands of 1 (5% O2-doped Xe, 10 K) 2133m, 2123s, 2102m, 2090m,
1608m, 1596m, 1593m, 1528s, 1492m, 1341m, 1304s, 1289s, 1176w,
3
4
5
1129w, 1105w, 860w, 847w, 748w cmꢁ1
.
IR bands of X (18O-isotopic shifts in cmꢁ1) 1602m (ꢁ1), 1571w (0)
1534s (ꢁ1), 1358m (ꢁ3), 1335s (ꢁ1), 1215w (ꢁ1), 1131m (ꢁ62),
1108w (ꢁ6), 1017m (ꢁ49), 856s (ꢁ1), 844s (ꢁ1), 751m (0) cmꢁ1
.
5 was synthesized by the published method.10 Ozone was prepared
with help of an ozonizer (Willbe ozonizer OZ-2, Ozone Shi-Nine inc.)
A. P. Scott and L. Radom, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 16502 (1996).
S. L. Laursen, J. E. Grace, R. L. DeKock, and S. A. Spronk, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 120, 12583 (1998).
6
7
8
9
W. W. Sander, J. Org. Chem., 53, 2091 (1988).
J. K. Parker and S. R. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 4271 (1999).
10 I. D. Entwistle, T. Gilkerson, R. A. W. Johnstone, and R. P. Telford,
Tetrahedron, 34, 213 (1978).
Published on the web (Advance View) February 26, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.478