Synthesis of Salicylihalamide A and Related Compounds
A R T I C L E S
Table 1. Ring-Closing Olefin Metathesis Studies (Eq 2)
transformation, albeit with different degrees of E/Z-selectivity.
Also, both differentially protected substrates 28a,b gave identical
E/Z-ratios under identical reaction conditions.47 Whereas pre-
catalyst 31 provided a 9:1 (E:Z) ratio with only a slight erosion
of selectivity over time, precatalyst 32 produced a lower 67:33
ratio, which remained constant over time.
products (ratio)a,b
substrate
t (h)
catalyst 31
catalyst. 32
28a
28a
28a
28b
28b
28b
1.3
6.3
18.3
1.3
6.3
18.3
29a:30a (90:10)
29a:30a (88:12)
29a:30a (80:20)
29b:30b (90:10)
29b:30b (88:12)
29b:30b (84:16)
29a:30a (66:34)
29a:30a (68:32)
29a:30a (67:33)
29b:30b (64:36)
29b:30b (67:33)
29b:30b (68:32)
In principle, olefin metathesis will produce a thermodynamic
distribution of products if secondary metathetical isomerizations
compete on the time scale of the experiment.48 There are two
primary factors that will affect the efficiency of secondary
metathetical isomerizations: (1) the activity of the propagating
Ru-methylidene species and (2) catalyst decomposition rates.49,50
In light of this, the more stable and more active “second
generation” catalysts (e.g. 32) were shown to enrich initially
formed products to the thermodynamic equilibrium ring closure
product.48d-g In contrast, kinetic product ratios cannot be ruled
out with the “first generation” Ru-alkylidene catalysts due to
their shorter lifetime (thermal instability)50 and less efficient
reaction with 1,2-disubstituted olefins (reaction products).16 We
conclude from our results that RCM with catalyst 32 rapidly
produces a thermodynamic ratio of products 29-30 on a time
scale that consumed all the starting material based on the
following observations: (1) the product ratio did not change
after prolonged exposure indicating that equilibrium was
established, (2) an identical product ratio is observed for the
formation of benzolactones 29-30 from both our precursors
(28a,b) and the nonidentical precursors described by Fu¨rstner
et al.,51 and (3) upon exposure of either geometrically pure 29a
or 30a to catalyst 32, an identical 67:33 mixture of 29a:30a
was formed. In contrast, the first generation Grubbs’ catalyst
31 kinetically induced the formation of the desired E-isomers
29a,b with relatively high selectivity and a thermodynamic
product ratio was never reached, even after prolonged reaction
times.
a Ratio determined by 1H NMR analysis. b In each individual experiment,
the combined isolated yield was >93%.
steps). Treatment of this aldehyde with the Z(O)-titanium enolate
derived from (2S)-N-(4-pentenoyl) bornanesultam 2343 produced
exclusively one diastereomeric aldol product 24 in 92% yield.
As before (Scheme 3), a three-step sequence starting from the
methoxymethyl ether 25 accomplished the oxidation state
readjustment to deliver the C12 methyl-substituted fragment 26.
Fluoride-assisted liberation of the C15 alcohol and subsequent
Mitsunobu38 coupling of 27 with carboxylic acid 16a36 or the
corresponding phenolic MOM ether 16b36 set the stage for a
detailed study of the crucial ring-closing olefin metathesis of
bis-olefins 28a,b.
The lack of a stereopredictive model for the formation of
large rings via RCM is exemplified by our results with the
metathetical ring closure of substrates 28a,b. Whereas the
diastereomeric substrate 17b gave the Z-olefin 18-Z (vide supra,
Scheme 4) as the major isomer, 28a fortuitously produced the
E-benzolactone 29a with an impressive selectivity of 9:1 when
subjected to similar reaction conditions (eq 2; 5 mol % catalyst
Having secured a viable sequence to the benzolactone core
of salicylihalamide A, we turned our attention to the installation
of the acylated enamine side chain. Toward this end, the
p-methoxybenzyl ether in 29a was oxidatively removed (DDQ)
and the resulting alcohol 33 was oxidized with Dess-Martin
periodinane (Scheme 6).52 Engagement of the resulting aldehyde
34 in a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) homologation
with trimethyl phosphonoacetate provided methyl ester 36a as
an inseparable mixture of E/Z-isomers in a ratio of 4:1. After
31, CH2Cl2, room temperature).44 To confuse the issue even
more, an initial single experiment with the corresponding
phenolic methoxymethyl ether 28b furnished benzolactones 29b
and 30b with an eroded selectivity of 3:1 upon exposure to
catalyst 31. In light of the above, a detailed study of the RCM
of 28a,b with Ru-alkylidene precatalysts 31 and 3245 was
conducted (eq 2 and Table 1).46 It is clear from these results
that both catalysts are equally efficient in performing the desired
(47) This indicates that the differences in E/Z-selectivity for the RCM of 28a
vs 28b observed during our initial experiments with catalyst 31 must be
due to subtle variations in reaction conditions.
(48) For selected examples of reversible olefin metathesis reactions, see: (a)
Marsella, M. J.; Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1997, 36, 1101-1103. (b) Xu, Z.; Johannes, C. W.; Houri, A. F.;
La, D. S.; Cogan, D. A.; Hofilena, G. E.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10302-10316. (c) Hamilton, D. G.; Feeder, N.; Teat, S.
J.; Sanders, J. K. M. New J. Chem. 1998, 22, 1019-1021. (d) Smith, A.
B., III; Adams, C. M.; Kozmin, S. A.; Paone, D. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5925-5937. (e) Lee, W. C.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2145-2147; correction: Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2559. (f) Fu¨rstner, A.; Thiel,
O. R.; Ackermann Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 449-451. (g) Lee, W. C.; Grubbs,
R. H. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7155-7158. (h) Wright, D. L.; Usher, L.
C.; Estrella-Jimenez, M. Org. Lett. In press.
(49) For the mechanism and activity of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts,
see: Sanford, M. S.; Love, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 6543-6554 and references therein.
(50) For stability and decomposition studies, see: Ulman, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7202-7207.
(43) Oppolzer, W.; Osamu, T.; Deerberg, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 1965-
1978.
(44) For selected examples of remote functionality affecting stereoselectivity,
see: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3942-
3943. (b) Meng, D.; Su, D.; Balog, A.; Bertinato, P.; Sorensen, E. J.;
Danishefsky, S. J.; Zheng, Y.; Chou, T.; He, L.; Horwitz, S. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2733-2734.
(45) N-Heterocyclic carbene ligated ruthenium alkylidene catalysts have been
independently reported by three groups, cf.: (a) Huang, J.; Stevens, E. D.;
Nolan, S. P.; Petersen, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2674-2678. (b)
Scholl, M.; Trnka, T. M.; Morgan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 2247-2250. (c) Ackermann, L.; Fu¨rstner, A.; Weskamp, T.; Kohl,
F. J.; Herrmann, W. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4787-4790.
(46) Identical reaction conditions (solvent, concentration, catalyst loading,
temperature, same batch of catalyst) were employed for all reactions of
Table 1.
(51) Fu¨rstner and co-workers recently reported results concerning the RCM of
compounds that differ from 28a,b only by an additional gem-dimethyl
substitution at the C9 olefin terminus.10d,e Limited to the use of a more
competent second-generation catalyst, compounds 29a/30a and 29b/30b
were obtained in an identical ratio of 67:33.
(52) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-7287.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 13, 2002 3249