S. Arimori et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 303–305
305
Cooperative binding of the two boronic acid groups is
clearly observed as illustrated by the stability constant
differences between PBA and 2. The stability constants
2. Arimori, S.; Bell, M. L.; Oh, C. S.; Frimat, K. A.; James,
T. D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1836.
3. Hartley, J. H.; James, T. D.; Ward, C. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
K for diboronic acid sensor 2 with
D-glucose are four
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3155.
(from fluorescence) and six (from UV–vis) times greater
than with PBA. Whereas the stability constants K of 2
4. Metzger, A.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1998, 37, 649.
5. Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 3666.
with
D
-fructose are only one (from fluorescence) and
two (from UV–vis) times stronger than PBA. These
results are not surprising since it is well known that
-glucose easily forms 1:1 cyclic complexes with
6. Cabell, L. A.; Monahan, M. K.; Anslyn, E. V. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7753.
7. Arimori, S.; Ward, C. J.; James, T. D. Chem. Commun.
D
diboronic acids, whereas
D
-fructose tends to form 2:1
acyclic complexes with diboronic acids.3
2001, 2019.
8. Springsteen, G.; Wang, B. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1608.
9. Lorand, J. P.; Edwards, J. O. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24,
769.
In conclusion sensor 2 and ARS produces a very
efficient
D
-glucose assay. Sensor 2 and ARS show an
enhanced response to
D
-glucose when compared to
10. Selected data for 2: mp 110–113°C; m/z (FAB) 1106
simple PBA (six-fold enhancement). Sensor 2 can can
also be used at much lower concentrations (ten times)
than PBA.
([M+H+4(3-HOCH2C6H4NO2)−4(H2O)]+,
100%);
HRSMS found: 1105.47177. C62H62B2N6O12 requires:
1105.464538; lH (300 MHz, CDCl3+CD3OD (a few
drops), Me4Si): 1.04 (4H, bs, NCCCH2), 1.30 (4H, bs,
NCCH2), 2.62 (4H, t, NCH2), 4.09 (4H, s, PhCH2N),
4.21 (4H, s, PhB(OH)CH2N), 7.18 (4H, d, J=3.96 Hz,
Ar-H), 7.25–7.34 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.43 (10H, m, Ar-H),
7.68 (2H, d, J=7.14 Hz, Ar-H); lC (75 MHz, CDCl3+
CD3OD (a few drops), Me4Si): 22.7, 26.1, 31.8, 55.3, 64.2,
126.5, 126.9, 127.2, 127.8, 128.3, 129.1, 129.3, 130.5,
130.7, 135.0; lB (96 MHz, CDCl3+CD3OD (a few
drops)): 9.64.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the Royal Society, the
EPSRC, Beckman–Coulter and Avecia Ltd for support.
We would also like to acknowledge the support of the
University of Bath.
11. Perrin, D. D.; Dempsey, B. Buffers for pH and Metal Ion
Control; Chapman and Hall: London, 1974.
12. The K values were analysed in KaleidaGraph using non-
linear (Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm) curve fitting.
The errors reported are the standard errors obtained
from the best fit.
References
1. Arimori, S.; Bosch, L. I.; Ward, C. J.; James, T. D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4553.