Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Dess-Martin oxidation10 of the derived primary alcohol then
furnished (-)-3 (57% yield, three steps), substrate for the
Horner-Emmons macrocyclization.6 Exposure of (-)-3 to
1 equiv of NaHMDS at -78 °C with subsequent warming
to 0 °C led to macrocycle (-)-8 in 72% yield.
those employed to advantage in our successful synthesis of
(+)-zampanolide (2).5 Assuming that the two natural prod-
ucts are related biosynthetically, we envisioned 1 to possess
the same C(19) relative stereochemistry. Thus, disconnection
of the macrocycle at the C(2-3) olefin gives rise to the
Horner-Emmons macrocyclization6 substrate 3. Scission at
the C(1-2) acyl phosphonate linkage and a higher order
cuprate7 coupling transform at C(17-18) further simplifies
3 to epoxide 4, diethylphosphonoacetic acid (5), and vinyl
bromide (-)-AB, the latter arising from fragments (+)-A
and (-)-B in our zampanolide program.5
The synthesis of dactylolide (1) began with union of the
higher order cuprate,7 derived from vinyl bromide (-)-AB,
and epoxide 4;8 alcohol (-)-6 was obtained in an unopti-
mized yield of 40% (Scheme 2). Acylation with com-
mercially available 5, employing the Steglich conditions,9
followed by selective desilylation (HF‚Pyr) at C(3) and
With sufficient quantities of (-)-8 in hand, the synthesis
of (+)-dactylolide (1) was completed in a straightforward
fashion (Scheme 3). Unmasking the C(7) hydroxyl (TBAF),
followed by Dess-Martin oxidation,10 furnished ketone
(+)-9 in 50% overall yield for the two steps. Oxidative
removal of the PMB ether (DDQ)11 then gave the penultimate
C(20) alcohol, which upon oxidation with Dess-Martin
periodinane10 afforded (+)-1 as the sole product (69% yield,
1
two steps), with spectral data [e.g., H (500 and 600 MHz)
and HSQC (600 MHz) NMR and HRMS] corresponding to
those derived from the natural material.12
Completion of the total synthesis of (+)-1 provided an
interesting observation: vinyl bromide (-)-AB gives rise
(6) Aristoff, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1954. Nicolaou, K. C.; Seitz,
S. P.; Pavia, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2030.
(7) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Kozlowski, J. A.; Parker, D. A.; Nguyen, S. L.;
McCarthy, K. E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 285, 437. (b) Smith, A. B.,
III; Friestad, G. K.; Duan, J. J.-W.; Barbosa, J.; Hull, K. G.; Iwashima, M.;
Qiu, Y.; Spoors, P. G.; Bertounesque, E.; Salvatore, B. A. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 7596.
(8) Prepared in one step from (S)-(-)-glycidol. For further details, see
the Supporting Information.
(9) Neisis, B.; Steglich, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 522.
(10) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155.
(11) Oikawa, Y.; Yoshioka, T.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982,
23, 885.
(12) (a) The 125 MHz 13C NMR data for synthetic (+)-1 revealed small
shifts (∆δ ) (0.1-0.9 ppm) for most carbon signals relative to the
corresponding signals reported for natural (+)-1; the 1H (500 and 600 MHz)
NMR spectra were identical. (b) Optical rotation data for natural (+)-1 )
+30.0° (c 1.0, MeOH); optical rotation for synthetic (+)-1 ) +235° (c
0.52, MeOH).
636
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 4, 2002