Ru(η-arene)Cl2P Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2002 927
tions to those described previously using styrene as the
substrate. Compound 4, with the rac-diphenyl[2.2]-
paracyclophane ligand, was ca. 50% more active than
2. However, it is worth noting that in both cases the
catalyst had decomposed during the hydrogenation
reaction and that the catalytic turnover is very low (see
Experimental Section).
While these catalysis results are not very impressive,
we have found that rac-diphenyl[2.2]paracyclophane is
an extremely useful ligand in palladium-catalyzed Heck
reactions and our results from these studies will be
reported in due course.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All reactions were conducted under an atmosphere of
nitrogen using dried and degassed solvents, although the
products were air stable. The compounds [Ru(η-C6H6)Cl2]2,7
[Ru(η-C16H16)Cl2]2,14 Ru(η-C6H6)Cl2(PPh3) (4),11 and rac-PPh2-
(C16H15) (1)5a were prepared by literature methods. Mass
spectra were obtained using positive fast atom bombardment
on a Micromass Autospec instrument. NMR spectra were
F igu r e 2. Molecular structure of 3a . Bond lengths (Å):
Ru(1)-P(1) ) 2.339(2), Ru(1)-Cl(1) ) 2.423(2), Ru(1)-Cl(2)
) 2.429(2), Ru(1)-C(1) ) 2.157(9), Ru(1)-C(2) ) 2.147(8),
Ru(1)-C(3) ) 2.326(8), Ru(1)-C(4) ) 2.197(8), Ru(1)-C(5)
) 2.281(8), Ru(1)-C(6) ) 2.392(8), P(1)-C(33) ) 1.845(9),
P(1)-C(39) ) 1.823(8), P(1)-C(17) ) 1.836(9), C(1)-C(2)
) 1.394(12), C(1)-C(6) ) 1.431(12), C(2)-C(3) ) 1.417(12),
C(3)-C(4) ) 1.404(12), C(4)-C(5) ) 1.411(12), C(5)-C(6)
) 1.384(11), C(6)-C(7) ) 1.487(12), C(7)-C(8) ) 1.584(13),
C(8)-C(9) ) 1.530(14), C(3)-C(16) ) 1.493(12), C(16)-
C(15) ) 1.579(12), C(15)-C(12) ) 1.518(13), C(9)-C(10) )
1.399(13), C(9)-C(14) ) 1.380(12), C(10)-C(11) ) 1.374(13),
C(11)-C(12) ) 1.403(12), C(12)-C(13) ) 1.381(13), C(13)-
C(14) ) 1.364(13), C(17)-C(18) ) 1.401(12), C(17)-C(22)
) 1.404(13), C(18)-C(19) ) 1.391(13), C(19)-C(20) )
1.396(16),C(20)-C(21))1.336(17),C(21)-C(22))1.394(15),
C(19)-C(32) ) 1.507(16), C(32)-C(31) ) 1.587(19), C(31)-
C(28) ) 1.477(19), C(22)-C(23) ) 1.535(14), C(23)-C(24)
) 1.585(17), C(24)-C(25) ) 1.509(19), C(25)-C(26) )
1.375(19), C(25)-C(30) ) 1.395(17), C(26)-C(27) ) 1.37(2),
C(27)-C(28) ) 1.38(2), C(28)-C(29) ) 1.326(18), C(29)-
C(30) ) 1.400(17).
1
recorded on a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer with H at 400.13
MHz, 31P at 161.98 MHz, and 13C at 100.1 MHz. 1H NMR
chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to residual 1H
signals in the deuterated solvents (CDCl3, δ 7.29), 31P{1H}
NMR spectra are reported in ppm downfield from an external
85% solution of phosphoric acid. Standard gradient-assisted
heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation (HMQC), correla-
tion spectrosopy (COSY), and nuclear Overhauser effect
spectroscopy (NOESY) pulse sequences were used to obtain
two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation spectra.15
Syn th esis of Ru (η-C6H6)Cl2{P P h 2(C16H15)} (2). To [Ru-
(η-C6H6)Cl2]2 (250 mg, 0.5 mmol) in CHCl3 (15 mL) was added
rac-PPh2(C16H15) (392 mg, 1 mmol) and the reaction mixture
stirred under reflux for 2 h. The solution was cooled, and the
solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give a red-brown solid (0.43
g, 76%). The solid was recrystallized from CH2Cl2-Et2O (1:1)
to give red crystals which were characterized as 2 by spec-
troscopy.
Spectroscopic data for 2: FAB-MS m/z 642 [M]+, 607 [M -
Cl]+, 491 [M - 2Cl - C6H6]+; 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3) 19.53 (s)
ppm; see Table 1 for other NMR data. Anal. Found (calcd): C,
56.33 (56.25); H, 3.85 (4.10).
Syn th esis of Ru (η-C16H16)Cl2{P P h 2(C16H15)} (3). To [Ru-
(η-C16H16)Cl2]2 (95 mg, 0.125 mmol) in CHCl3 (30 mL) was
added rac-PPh2(C16H15) (0.098 mg, 0.25 mmol) and the reaction
mixture stirred under reflux for 2 h. The solution was cooled,
and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give a red-brown
solid (0.142 g, 74%). The solid was recrystallized from CH2-
Cl2-Et2O (1:1) to give red crystals which were characterized
as 3 by spectroscopy.
Spectroscopic data for 3: FAB-MS m/z 772 [M]+, 737 [M -
Cl]+, 701 [M - 2Cl]+; 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3) 32.41 (s) ppm;
see Table 1 for other NMR data. Anal. Found (calcd): C, 68.51
(68.39); H, 5.25 (5.35).
Cr ysta l Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion for 3. Crystals were
mounted on a thin glass fiber using silicon grease and cooled
on the diffractometer to 100 K using an Oxford Cryostream
low-temperature attachment. A total of 90 oscillation frames
each of width 2° in φ and with 30 s exposure time were
recorded using a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer, with a
detector to crystal distance of 25 mm. Crystals were indexed
from the first 10 frames using the DENZO-SMN package,16
of [2.2]paracyclophane to an electron-withdrawing frag-
ment such as Cr(CO)3 results in the removal of some
π-electron density between the aromatic decks, which
allows the rings to move closer together, changing from
3.09 to 3.02 Å. The larger change observed in Ru(η-
C16H16)Cl2(PPh3) (3a and 3b) reflects the greater electron-
withdrawing effect of the ruthenium(II) ion versus the
chromium(0) atom. The distances between the rings in
the [2.2]paracyclophanyl groups of the phosphine ligands
are 2.988 and 3.006 Å, also suggesting that the π-elec-
tron density between the aromatic rings has decreased.
This could also arise from the distortion caused to the
[2.2]paracyclophanyl group, where the carbon atom
bonds to the phosphorus. This carbon atom causes the
aryl ring to adopt more of a butterfly shape, although
the torsion angle across the nonbridgehead atoms is only
ca. 1.8°. The remaining intramolecular structural fea-
tures are unremarkable, and the key bonding param-
eters are listed in the figure caption.
Com p a r ison of th e Ca ta lytic Activity of 2 a n d 4
in th e Hyd r ogen a tion of Styr en e. Ruthenium(II)-
arene compounds of formula [Ru(η6-arene)Cl2(PR3)]
have been shown to catalyze the hydrogenation of
styrene and phenylacetylene.13 The catalytic activity of
compounds 2 and 4 was compared under similar condi-
(14) Elsegood, M. R. J .; Tocher, D. A. J . Organomet. Chem. 1988,
356, C29.
(15) Zhu, J .-M.; Smith, I. C. P. Concepts Magn. Reson. 1995, 7, 281
and references therein.
(13) Moldes, I.; de la Encarnacio´n, E.; Ros, J .; Alvarez-Larena, AÄ .;
Piniella, J . F. J . Organomet. Chem. 1998, 566, 165.
(16) Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. In Methods in Enzymology; Carter,
C. W., Sweet, R. M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1996. Vol. 276.