R. Chang, et al.
JournalofInorganicBiochemistry203(2020)110929
indicated the formation of 1:1 chelation ratio of EDTA-ASA and Cu2+
.
The 1:1 binding mode between EDTA-ASA and Cu2+ was also estab-
lished using Job's plot methods. The fluorescence emission intensity got
a minimum when the molar ratio fraction was 0.5, which further ver-
ified a 1:1 stoichiometry of EDTA-ASA and Cu2+. Cu2+ may be che-
lated at the N (-NH-, amino‑nitrogen) and O (-COOH, carboxyl group)
atoms of EDTA-ASA to satisfy the need for saturated 1:1 coordination
by forming stable EDTA-ASA-Cu complex. Theoretical calculations
based on DFT principles were employed to better understand the phe-
nomenon of fluorescence quenching and the chelation interaction be-
tween EDTA-ASA and Cu2+ in the following discussions.
The binding association constant (Ka) is used to evaluate the stabi-
lity of interaction between the chelator and metal ions together in a
solution. We adopted the Benesi-Hildebrand eq. (B–H equation) to de-
termine the Ka of EDTA-ASA and Cu2+ in Tris-HCl buffer solution [45].
There is a great linear relationship with the R2 value of 0.9984 in
Fig. 2(b). The Ka value was counted as 6.852 × 107 M−1 for EDTA-
ASA-Cu complex, indicating a robust binding association between
EDTA-ASA and Cu2+. Moreover, the EDTA-ASA-Zn complex showed
the same 1:1 stoichiometry, and the Ka was calculated to be
9.765 × 105 M−1, which is far below that of EDTA-ASA-Cu complex
(Fig. S9-S11, ESI†).
Fig. 1. Fluorescence spectrum of EDTA-ASA (10 μM) on addition of different
metal ions (10 μM) of Cu2+, Zn2+, Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Al3+, Ba2+
,
Competition experiments study further assessed the specificity of
EDTA-ASA for Cu2+. as shown in Fig. 3(a), there was almost no sig-
nificant decrease in fluorescence intensity when EDTA-ASA was treated
Ag+, Mn2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, Co2+, Ni2+ and Hg2+ in Tris-HCl buffer solution
(10 mM, pH 7.4). Image: Selective fluorescent response of EDTA-ASA in the
presence of metal ions (under UV light).
with 1 equal of other metal ions (Zn2+, Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+
,
Al3+, Ba2+, Ag+, Mn2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Hg2+). How-
ever, upon addition of another 1 equal Cu2+ to the mixed solution of
EDTA-ASA with other metal ions, an apparent fluorescence quenching
was noticed. It was apparent that the quenching of fluorescence aroused
by the mixture of Cu2+ with other metal ions was almost the same as
that induced by Cu2+ only. As shown in Fig. 3(b), after EDTA-ASA was
treated with of 1 equiv. Cu2+, other excess 10 equiv. of competitive
metal ions were added, there is almost no interference in fluorescence
signal. Therefore, these consequences demonstrated that other common
competitive metal ions do not significantly influence the recognition of
EDTA-ASA for Cu2+, which confirms that EDTA-ASA behaves high
selectivity for Cu2+ in Tris-HCl buffer solution.
presence of 1.0 equal different metal ions. Collectively, EDTA-ASA
alone had relatively strong fluorescence centered at near 403 nm in
Tris-HCl buffer solution. Upon addition with 1.0 equal Cu2+, while, the
fluorescence at 403 nm was almost wholly quenched. The fluorescence
changed from “on” to “off.” In contrast, the other metal ions including
Zn2+ failed to show any dramatic fluorescence change in fluorescence
behavior of EDTA-ASA. The UV–vis spectra of EDTA-ASA on addition of
different metal ions in Tris-HCl buffer solution were also employed (Fig.
S7, ESI†). For comparison purpose, we also investigated the fluores-
cence properties of control compound 4-ASA in Tris-HCl buffer solu-
tion. A negligible response of 4-ASA was observed towards all the tested
metal ions (Fig. S8, ESI†). Therefore, the results confirmed that EDTA-
ASA exhibited good selectivity and displayed a dynamic “on-off” be-
havior towards Cu2+ in Tris-HCl buffer solution.
The fluorescence emission spectra of EDTA-ASA with different
counter anions (SO42−, Cl−, NO3−, Br−, ClO4−, and OAc−) was in-
vestigated to determine the influence of interference anions on the re-
cognition efficiency. This result illustrated that these anions had almost
no interference with the recognition of Cu2+ (Fig. S12, ESI†). It is the
chelation of Cu2+ and EDTA-ASA that leads to the efficient fluores-
cence quenching of EDTA-ASA, these anions exhibit no distinct effect
on the recognition selectivity.
Notably, the efficient quenching of fluorescence indicated that
EDTA-ASA showed a specific response to Cu2+. Before coordination
with Cu2+, EDTA-ASA have strong fluorescence. However, when
EDTA-ASA was coordinated with Cu2+, the fluorescence is quenched,
which is probably due to the formation of a non-fluorescent complex
EDTA-ASA-Cu. This “on-off” switching could be explained with chela-
tion-enhanced fluorescence quenching (CHEQ) effect and PET-en-
hanced process [38–40]. These metal ions differ too much in many
ways such as the orbital shape, electron density, size of the metal ion,
and they can establish different coordination interactions. The metal
ions that failed to cause a significant change in fluorescence intensity
may be due to the inappropriate coordination conformation and un-
suitable ion radius. This phenomenon is following the case of d9 Cu (II),
it is the highest in the Irving-Williams series [41]. Moreover, due to the
Jahn-Teller effect, the complex EDTA-ASA-Cu has higher stability [42].
Furthermore, Cu2+ is paramagnetic with an empty shell, the intrinsic
paramagnetic nature of Cu2+ from spin-orbit coupling could actively
quench the emission of a nearby fluorophore via non-radiative inter-
system crossing (ISC) transition process [43,44].
The reversibility of the fluorescence response process of EDTA-ASA
towards Cu2+ was also explored with EDTA. After addition of excess
EDTA to the EDTA-ASA and Cu2+ mixed solution, the fluorescence
returned to the original fluorescence of EDTA-ASA, which strongly
reveals that the Cu2+ recognition is a reversible chelation process (Fig.
S13, S14, ESI†). These results may be connected with the different Ka
between the chelators and Cu2+. Tough its binding affinity of Cu2+
with EDTA-ASA (EDTA-ASA-Cu, Ka = 6.852 × 107 M−1, namely lg
Ka = 7.84) is not as good as EDTA (EDTA-Cu, namely lg Ka = 18.7), it
exhibits a high selectivity towards Cu2+ with much higher efficiency
than EDTA.
It is well known that the stability of the metal chelator is of sig-
nificance for further practical application. Thus, the interrelationship
between the fluorescence of EDTA-ASA and pH variation was in-
vestigated to confirm the optimum pH range in application. When pH is
in the range of 2–4, the fluorescence intensity of the fluorescence
spectrum is nearly zero (Fig. S15, ESI†). This is probably due to the
weak solubility of EDTA-ASA in Tris-HCl buffer solution. The fluores-
cence intensity of EDTA-ASA increased moderately with the change of
pH from 4 to 7 and maintained relative stability in the pH range of
response properties of EDTA-ASA to Cu2+. As is presented in Fig. 2(a),
EDTA-ASA displayed strong fluorescence at 403 nm. Upon adding
various molar of Cu2+ (0–1 equal) into EDTA-ASA, the fluorescence
intensity gradually decreased, and the fluorescence intensity nearly
remains unchanged even 1.0 equal Cu2+ was added. The results
4