whole process should take place in the hydrogen atom
abstraction step.9
diastereomers was also possible by flash chromatography.
The optical purity (>99% ee) of the four sulfoxides trans-
1a, cis-1a, trans-1b, and cis-1b was determined by HPLC
on a chiral column (Daicel, Chiralcel OB-H).
To test the feasibility of the translocation-elimination
cascade, the o-bromosulfoxide 1a was prepared in racemic
form from 2-bromothiophenol by alkylation with the corre-
sponding bromide followed by oxidation with m-CPBA
(Scheme 2). The cis/trans mixture of isomers of 1a was
treated with tin hydride AIBN in refluxing benzene to give
4-phenylcyclohexene 2a in excellent yield.
Scheme 2
The cis and trans isomers of 1a and 1b were submitted
separately to classical radical tin hydride reduction conditions
according to eq 2 (slow addition of Bu3SnH over 12 h, AIBN,
300 W sun lamp, 10 °C); results are shown in Table 1, entries
1-4.
The enantiomerically pure sulfoxides 1a and 1b were
prepared from the diastereomerically pure menthyl (S)-2-
bromophenylsulfinate 3 (eq 1).10 The cis and trans isomers
were separated by flash chromatograhy. To isolate satisfac-
tory quantities of the minor cis isomer, epimerization of the
R-center was achieved by deprotonation of trans-1a with
LDA followed by protonation with 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-
methylphenol. This procedure afforded 1a as a cis/trans 2:1
mixture of diastereomers. After flash chromatography, di-
astereomerically pure cis-1a (52%) and trans-1a (25%) were
isolated. A nonoptimized isomerization procedure was used
with trans-1b using water instead of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-
methylphenol for the protonation step. It afforded 1b as a
cis/trans 1:1 mixture in 80% yield. Separation of the
The expected 4-substituted cyclohexenes 2a and 2b were
isolated in 65-75% yields. Starting from the trans isomer,
the cyclohexenes 2a and 2b were nearly racemic. However,
cis-1a and cis-1b gave 2a and 2b with ee’s of 70% and 80%,
respectively. The absolute configuration the major isomer
of 2b was deduced from the comparison of the optical
rotatory power with the one reported in the literature for (R)-
2b.11 The absolute configuration of 2a was assigned by
analogy to the case to 2b. A model for the transition state
of the reaction with cis-1b supported by ab initio calculations
(UHF 6-31G*) is reported in Figure 1. The cyclohexane ring
lies in a chair conformation, and the sulfinyl group occupies
an axial position. The distance between the Car(‚) and the
abstracted hydrogen atom was set at 1.4 Å. The preferred
transition state E (∆∆Hf ) 0 kcal/mol) minimizes the steric
interactions between the oxygen atom of the sulfoxide and
the cyclohexyl group. The minor transition state F (∆∆Hf
) +2.0 kcal/mol) is destabilized by interaction of the oxygen
atom with the cyclohexyl ring.
(5) For a related hydrogen abstraction/fragmentation process involving
sulfones, see: Brown, C. D. S.; Dishington, A. P.; Shiskin, O.; Simpkins,
N. S. Synlett 1995, 943-914. Vandort, P. C.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 7142-7147.
(6) For mechanistical and kinetic studies, see: Wagner, P. J.; Sedon, J.
H.; Lindstrom, M.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2579-2580. Synthetic
applications: Shevlin, P. B.; Boothe, T. J.; Greene, J. L.; Willcott, M. R.;
Inners, R. R.; Cornelis, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3874-3879. Russel,
G. A.; Tashtoush, H.; Ngoviwatchai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
4622-4623.
(7) For an early synthetic application of the radical fragmention of
â-sulfinylated radicals, see: Miyamato, N.; Furuoka, D.; Utimoto, K.;
Nozaki, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47, 503-504. For a recent
application to the preparation of allenes, see: Delouvrie´, B.; Lacoˆte, E.;
Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3565-3568.
(8) For an application in asymmetric synthesis, see: (a) Malacria, M.;
Lacoˆte, E.; Delouvrie´, B.; Fensterbank, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1998, 37, 2116-2118. For a related example based on sulfimide, see: (b)
Clark, A. J.; Rooke, S.; Sparey, T. J.; Taylor, P. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 909-912.
Table 1. Radical Mediated Fragmentation of Sulfoxides 1a and
1b According to eq 2
sulfoxide
Lewis acid
product
yield [%]
ee [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
trans-1a
cis-1a
trans-1b
cis-1b
cis-1a
cis-1a
none
none
none
none
MADa
MADPPb
MADPc
2a
2a
2b
2b
2a
2a
2a
75
65
70
70
60
65
57
0
70 (R)
0
80 (R)
76 (R)
84 (R)
86 (R)
(9) The diastereoselectivity of hydrogen transfer has not been investigated
in a systematic fashion. For an isolated example of diastereoselective
hydrogen transfer, see: Bogen, S.; Malacria, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 3992-3993.
(10) Imboden, C.; Renaud, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 1051-
1060.
cis-1a
a MAD ) methylaluminum di(2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenoxide).
b MADPP ) methylaluminum di(2,6-diphenylphenoxide). c MADP ) meth-
ylaluminum diphenoxide.
(11) Sodozai, S. K.; Lepoivre, J. A.; Dommisse, R. A.; Alderweireldt,
F. C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1980, 89, 637-642.
874
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 6, 1999