We thank the EU COST D21 programme, Project D21/
0001/00, for support.
Notes and references
‡
Satisfactory microanalyses were obtained for compounds I–III.
Preparation of I: to a solution of Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (20 mmol) in methanol
was added dropwise 20 mmol of tmen in methanol followed by stirring for
1 h. After work-up, recrystallisation from acetone gave colourless crystals
of I suitable for X-ray crystallography.
Preparation of II and III by self-assembly: to a solution of Zn(OA-
c)2·2H2O (20 mmol) and tmen (20 mmol) in methanol was added dropwise
BHA (20 mmol) in methanol followed by stirring for 3 h. II was filtered off
leaving on concentration a pale yellow oil which on stirring in diethyl ether
for 1 h gave a white solid which on recrystallisation from acetone gave
colourless crystals of III suitable for X-ray crystallography.
Preparation of II and III from I: to a solution of I (20 mmol) in methanol
was added dropwise a solution of BHA (20 mmol) in methanol followed by
stirring for 3 h. Identical work-up as in the preceding method gave II and III
as above.
Crystallography: crystal data: for I: C10H22N2O4Zn, M = 299.67,
monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 14.9905(19), b = 7.3672(14), c =
12.5105(17) Å, b = 97.015(3)°, U = 1371.3(4) Å3, Z = 4, l = 0.71073 Å,
m = 1.796 mm21, 1327 independent reflections were measured. Final R1 =
0.0661 and wR2 = 0.1666.
For III: C19H31N3O8Zn2, M = 560.21, orthorhombic, space group Pbca,
a = 8.9976(11), b = 15.9235(19), c = 33.533(2) Å, U = 4804.4(9) Å3, Z
= 8, l = 0.71073 Å, m = 2.044 mm21, 6118 independent reflections were
measured. Final R1 = 0.0355 and wR2 = 0.0663.
Data were collected using a Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer. Refinement was by full-matrix least squares on F2 for all
data using SHELXL-97.14 Hydrogen atoms were added at calculated
positions and refined using a riding model.
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of complex III. Selected bond distances (Å) and
angles (°): Zn1–O6 2.0760(16), Zn2–O6 1.9729(16), Zn1–O5 2.1160(16),
Zn1–O1 2.1140(16), Zn2–O2 1.9614(16), Zn1–N2 2.1469(16), Zn2–O7
1.9320(17), Zn2–O8 2.9922(19), N1–H…O8 2.7138(28), Zn1–Zn2
3.2368(5); O6–Zn1–O1 92.74(6), O6–Zn1–O5 78.13(6), O1–Zn1–N2
94.36(7), O7–Zn1–O2 106.63(7), O4–Zn2–O2 105.66(8), O4–Zn2–O6
109.00(7).
suppdata/cc/b2/b202612k/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other
electronic format.
hydroxamate hydroxy group and bonding of only one metal
centre by the hydroxamate carbonyl oxygen. In addition, III
shows a number of structural features very close to that of the
native Zn2AAP inhibited by p-iodo- -phenylalanine hydroxa-
D
mic acid.9 Firstly, in both cases the zinc atoms in III and in
inhibited Zn2AAP have different coordination numbers (Zn1, 6
and Zn2, 4 in III and Zn1, 5 and Zn2, 4 in the inhibited enzyme).
Secondly, the bridge bonds in III are unequal, Zn1–O6 =
2.0760(16) and Zn2–O6 = 1.9729(16) Å, as are those in the
inhibited enzyme with values of 2.4 and 1.8 Å, respectively,
consistent with the different coordination numbers of the two
1 D. E. Wilcox, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2435.
2 N. Sträter and W. N. Lipscomb, Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 14792.
3 E. Jabri, M. B. Carr, R. P. Hausinger and P. A. Karplus, Science, 1995,
268, 998.
4 S. L. Roderick and B. W. Matthews, Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 3907.
5 Z. F. Kanyo, L. R. Scolnick, D. E. Ash and D. W. Christianson, Nature,
1996, 383, 554.
6 M. A. Holmes and B. W. Matthews, Biochemistry, 1981, 20, 6912.
7 W. Bode, P. Reinemer, R. Hubert, T. Kleine, T. Schnierer and H.
Tschesche, Eur. Mol. Biol. Org. J., 1994, 13, 1263.
8 M. A. Pearson, L. O. Michel, R. P. Hausinger and P. A. Karplus,
Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 8164.
zinc centres in both cases. Thirdly, the capping acetate in III is
1
clearly h with Zn2–O7
= 1.9320(17) and Zn2–O8 =
2.9922(19) Å due to a hydrogen bond between the N1H of the
hydroxamate and the free acetate oxygen, O8 with an N1–
H…O8 distance of 2.7138(28) Å. This behaviour in III mimics
the hydrogen bonding occurring between an oxygen of the
carbonyl group of Glu151 and the hydroxylamino nitrogen (3.3
Å) in inhibited Zn2AAP.9
9 B. Chevrier, H. DAorchymount, C. Schaik, C. Tamus and D. Moras, Eur.
J. Biochem., 1996, 237, 6388.
10 M. Arnold, D. A. Brown, O. Deeg, W. Errington, W. Haase, K. Herlihy,
T. J. Kemp, H. Nimir and R. Werner, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 2920.
11 D. A. Brown, W. Errington, W. K. Glass, W. Haase, T. J. Kemp, H.
Nimir, S. M. Ostrovsky and R. Werner, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40,
5962.
12 A. H. Mahdi, personal communication.
13 D. A. Brown, W. K. Glass and S. J. C. McGardle, Inorg. Chim. Acta,
1983, 80, 13.
In conclusion, the very similar structures of III and
hydroxamate inhibited Zn2AAP illustrate the ability of hy-
droxamic acids to induce dimerisation of mononuclear species
and to then mimic closely the inhibition of related dinuclear
metalloenzymes. Extension to other hydroxamic acids, includ-
ing the secondary series, is in progress to establish criteria for
their possible pharmaceutical efficacy in enzyme inhibition.
14 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL 97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal
Structures, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1210–1211
1211