3402
J. J. Clemens et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 3401–3404
of a phenyl ring between the ‘linker’ and ‘lipophilic tail’
regions of the S1P analogues, as is the case in phos-
pho-FTY720. These effects include a total loss of
activity at S1P2, increase in agonism at S1P5, and a loss
of C2-stereospecificity at the S1P1 and S1P3 receptors.
commenced with PyBOP mediated coupling of N-Boc-
(d)-Serine(Bzl)–OH with the appropriate alkyl amine
or p-alkyl aniline (Scheme 2).7 The resulting amides
6a–e were then subjected to hydrogenolysis to afford the
deprotected alcohols 7a–e. These alcohols were then
phosphorylated using di-tert-butyl diisopropylpho-
sphoramidite with subsequent oxidation of the phos-
phite by hydrogen peroxide to give the protected
phosphates 8a–e. Deprotection of 8a–e using 1:1 TFA/
CH2Cl2 gave the final products 5e and 9a–d as the TFA
salts.
Our preparation of S1P analogues began with the
synthesis of the (2S)-N-alkyl amide, (2S)-O-alkyl ester,
and (2S)-N-aryl amide compounds, 5a–c, 5d, and 9e–f,
respectively (Scheme 1).7 N-Boc-(l)-Serine was pro-
tected as the benzyl ester using benzyl bromide under
standard conditions. The protected amino acid 1 was
then phosphorylated using di-tert-butyl diisopropyl-
phosphoramidite with subsequent hydrogen peroxide
oxidation of the phosphite to afford 2 which underwent
hydrogenolysis to give acid 3. Coupling of 3 to the
appropriate alkyl amine using DCC afforded the pro-
tected N-alkyl amides 4a–c. Coupling of 3 to 1-tetra-
decanol using the PyBOP reagent gave the protected O-
alkyl ester 4d. Coupling of 3 to the appropriate p-alkyl
aniline using the PyBOP reagent afforded the protected
N-aryl amides 4e–f. Deprotection of the amides 4a–c
and 4e–f and ester 4d using 1:1 TFA/CH2Cl2 gave the
final products 5a–d and 9e–f as the TFA salts.
Receptor activation by S1P and the synthetic analogues
was determined in vitro by measuring the ligand depen-
dant binding of [g-35S]GTP to membranes containing
each of the five human S1P receptors expressed in
HEK293T cells.8 None of the compounds in these series
showed any activity at the related lysophosphatidic acid
receptors (LPA1À3) at concentrations up to 10 mM in
this assay (data not shown). As was previously reported,
R-configuration at the C2 position of the N-alkyl amide
analogues appears to result in increased binding at S1P1
and S1P3, but not at the other S1P receptors (Table 1).7
Although the N-alkyl amide and O-alkyl ester com-
pounds were poor agonists at S1P2, introduction of a
phenyl ring between the ‘linker’ and ‘lipophilic tail’
The synthetic route to the (2R)-N-alkyl amide and (2R)-
N-aryl amide compounds, 5e and 9a–d, respectively,
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) Cs2CO3, BnBr, DMF, rt, 12 h, quant.; (ii) tetrazole, di-tert-butyl diisopropylphosphoramidite, 1:1 CH2Cl2/
THF, rt, 12 h; (iii) H2O2, rt, 4 h, quant. (2 steps); (iv) H2, 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 12 h, 91%; (v) DCC, DMAP, HOBT, CH2Cl2, rt, 12 h, 26–41%;
(vi) PyBOP, DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt, 6 h, 43–60% (15% for 4d); (vii) 1:1 TFA/CH2Cl2, rt, 4 h, 96–100%.
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) PyBOP, DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt, 6 h, 65–77%; (ii) H2, 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 12 h, 84–96%; (iii) tetrazole, di-tert-
butyl diisopropylphosphoramidite, 1:1 CH2Cl2/THF, rt, 12 h; (iv) H2O2, rt, 4 h, 60–100% (2 steps, 9% for 9d); (v) 1:1 TFA/CH2Cl2, rt, 4 h, 56–
100%.