1330 Bokhari et al.
Asian J. Chem.
TABLE-5
REFERENCES
MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION FOR
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF SULFONAMIDE
LIGANDS AND THEIR COMPLEXES
1. Z.A. Siddiqi, M. Khalid, S. Kumar, M. Shahid and S. Noor, Eur. J.
Med. Chem., 45, 264 (2010).
2. G.F. Yang and H. Z. Yang, Chin. J. Chem., 17, 650 (1999).
3. B.R. Stranix, J.-F. Lavallée, G. Sévigny, J.Yelle, V. Perron, N. LeBerre,
D. Herbart and J.J. Wu, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 16, 3459 (2004).
4. S. Cezar and K. Angela, Acta Chim. Slov., 47, 179 (2000).
5. P. Selvam, D.F. Smee, B.B. Gowen, C.W. Day, D. Barnard and J. Morrey,
Antiviral Res., 74, 81 (2007).
6. H.S. Patel and H.J. Mistry, Phosphorous, Sulfur, Silicon Rel. Elem., 179,
1085 (2004).
7. C.T. Supuran, A. Casini, A. Mastrolorenzo and A. Scozzafava, Mini
Rev. Med. Chem., 4, 625 (2004).
8. T.H. Maren, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 16, 309 (1976).
9. J.J. Li, D. Anderson, E.G. Burton, J.N. Cogburn, J.T. Collins, D.J.
Garland, S.A. Gregory, H.C. Huang, P.C. Isakson, C.M. Koboldt, E.W.
Logusch, M.B. Norton, W.E. Perkins, E.J. Reinhard, K. Seibert, A.W.
Veenhuizem, Y. Zang and D.B. Reitz, J. Med. Chem., 38, 4570 (1995).
10. A.K. Gadad, C.S. Mahajanshetti, S. Nimbalkar and A. Raichurkar, Eur.
J. Med. Chem., 35, 853 (2000).
11. V.S. Misra, V.K. Saxena and R. Srivastava, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 59,
781 (1982).
12. F. Zani and P. Vicini, Arch. Pharm., 331, 219 (1998).
13. C.T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, B.C. Jurca and M.A. Ilies, Eur. J. Med.
Chem., 33, 83 (1998).
14. G. Renzi, A. Scozzafava and C.T. Supuran, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
10, 673 (2000).
15. H. Yoshino, N. Ueda, J. Niijima, H. Sugumi, Y. Kotake, N. Koyanagi,
K. Yoshimatsu, M. Asada and T. Watanabe, J. Med. Chem., 35, 2496
(1992).
16. D.J. Abraham, W.S. John and N.J. Hoboken, Burger's Medicinal Chemistry
and Drug Discovery, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2003).
17. E.D. Clercq, Curr. Med. Chem., 8, 1543 (2001).
18. C. Wu, E.R. Decker, G.W. Holland, F.D. Brown, F.D. Stavros, T.A.
Brock and R.A.C. Dixon, Drugs Today, 37, 441 (2001).
19. J.K. Barton, J.M. Goldberg, C.V. Kumar and N.J. Turro, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 108, 2081 (1986).
20. S. Delaney, M. Pascaly, P.K. Bhattacharya, K. Han and J.K. Barton,
Inorg. Chem., 41, 1966 (2002).
21. A.P. Mishra and S.K. Gavtarm, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 81, 324 (2004).
22. N.A.Venkariya, M.D. Khunt and A.P. Parikh, Indian J. Chem., 42B,
421 (2003).
23. N.M. Sivasankaran and S.T. David, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 77, 220 (2000).
24. R.K. Murray and D.K. Granner, Haper Biochemistry,Appleton and Lange,
Stamford (1996).
25. N. Raman, S. Ravichandran and C. Thangaraja, J. Chem. Sci., 116, 215
(2004).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL)
Sample No.
S. aureus B. subtilis
P. multocida
E. coli
250
225
250
248
262
285
115
251
57
3L1
3L2
3L1M1
3L1M2
3L1M3
3L1M4
3L2M5
3L2M6
265
251
224
225
250
285
124
262
74
262
262
249
234
251
276
28
285
255
278
265
251
224
125
250
274
98
Streptomycin
30
using fluconazole as positive control. These results were
helpful to conclude that the values of sulfonamides and their
complexes were satisfactory. Results are summarized in Table-6.
TABLE-6
MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION FOR
ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF SULFONAMIDE
LIGANDS AND THEIR COMPLEXES
Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL)
Aspergillus Aspergillus Helmenthosporium Alternaria
Sample
No.
niger
261
260
215
250
275
285
151
284
130
flavus
275
275
261
251
260
301
115
275
125
medis
251
225
284
274
261
185
135
275
85
alternate
261
250
261
258
275
259
125
3L1
3L2
3L1M1
3L1M2
3L1M3
3L1M4
3L2M5
3L2M6
Fluconazole
260
75
Cytotoxicity: Sample's toxicity analysis was performed
and Statistix MINITAB 13 was used to obtain the results. The
significance of samples was compare with the help of two
standers. The erthrocytic membrane mechanical stability is a
good indicator for the screening of cytotoxicity. It is also depen-
dent upon their physical and structural properties. Haemolysis
is a infectious disease which occurs due to presence of parasites
(Plasmodium falciparum) and other microbes33. The given
figure showed the observed values of % haemolysis with selec-
ted values of ligands and complexes. On y-axis lysis of human
blood is compared. With the selected sample compounds on
x-axis comparing with positive control having (100 %) lysis.
While PBS used as a negative control have (0.0 %) lysis.
Samples showed good haemolytic activity by comparing them
with positive control. Results are summerized in Table-7.
26. J.G. Lombardino, J. Chem., 9, 315 (1971).
27. M. Shafiq, M. Zia-ur-rehman, I.U. Khan, M.N. Arshad and I. Ahmad,
Acta Crystal., E65, o2453 (2009).
28. C. Tang, R. Tang, C. Tang and Z. Zeng, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 31,
1283 (2010).
29. K. Nakamoto, IR and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination
Complexes, Part A: Theory and Applications in Inorganic Chemistry,
edn 5, Wiley, New York (1997).
30. M. Thomas, M.K.M. Nair and P.K. Radhakrishnan, Synth. React. Inorg.
Met-Org. Chem., 25, 471 (1995).
31. M.M.Ali, M.M.F. Ismail, M.S.A. El-Gaby, M.A. Zahran andY.A.Ammar,
Molecules, 5, 864 (2000).
32. K. Jamil, M. Bakhtiar, A. Khan, F. Rubina, R. Rehana, R. Wajid and M.
Qaisar, Afr. J. Pure Appl. Chem., 3, 71 (2009).
33. M.A. Neelakantan, M. Esakkiammal, S.S. Mariappan, J. Dharmaraja and
T. Jeyakumar, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 72, 216 (2010).
TABLE-7
HAEMOLYTIC VALUES FOR SULFONAMIDE
LIGANDS AND THEIR COMPLEXES
Sample Hemolytic activity
Sample
No.
3L1M4
3L2M5
3L2M6
PBS
Hemolytic activity
(mean % S.D.)
No.
(mean % S.D.)
3.52 0.72
4.34 1.18
4.21 0.69
1.15 0.34
1.46 0.49
3L1
3L2
5.09 1.06
4.03 1.04
3.35 1.18
0.00 0.0
100 0.0
3L1M1
3L1M2
3L1M3
Triton (toxicity)