964
J. Lee et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 961–964
with a potent MetRS inhibitor 23 by molecular model-
ing (Fig. 1). The docking conformation of 23 into the
active site of MetRS was obtained from energy mini-
mization, followed by an alignment procedure on the
reported X-ray structure of aminoacyl adenylate bound
into aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases using GSAP.15 We
referred to a previous model of the active site proposed
by the site-directed mutagenesis of the methionine
binding site.16 The docking study was performed using
the DOCK procedure of the Sybyl 6.6. 23 was rigidly
docked into the binding site using graphical manipula-
tion with continuous energy monitoring. The manually
docked local energy minimized receptor–ligand complex
was subjected to an additional conjugate gradient mini-
mization using the minimization criteria. The result is
represented in Figure 1. In this model, two essential
interactions in methionine were examined as reported
previously.16 While the sulfur atom interacted with
phenolic hydroxyl of Tyr15 by hydrogen bonding, the
ammonium group coordinated with both carbonyl and
carboxylate of Asp52 by dipole-ionic and ionic interac-
tion. We also found two hydrogen bonds in adenosine,
whose 30-OH and 6-NH2 interacted with the NH of
Tyr15 and carbonyl of His24, respectively. Further
examination indicated that the enzyme contained a deep
and narrow hydrophobic pocket around the binding site
of the adenine base in order to afford binding of syn-
thesized MetRS inhibitors with methylene and ethylene
linkers. Although this model did not consider the parti-
cipation of water during the ligand–receptor interaction,
due to the lack of its X-ray structure, it will be helpful
for our continuing receptor-guided investigation into
MetRS inhibitors.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a grant (HMP-00-
CH-15-0014) from the Ministry of Health & Welfare,
R.O.K. the Brain Korea 21 Project to J. Lee, as well as
a grant from the National Creative Research Initiatives
to S. Kim.
References and Notes
1. van der Haar, F.; Gabius, H. J.; Cramer, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 217.
2. De Pouplana, L. R.; Schimmel, P. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000,
57, 865.
3. Schimmel, P.; Tao, J.; Hill, J. FASEB J. 1998, 12, 1599.
4. Renau, T. E.; Hecker, S. J.; Lee, V. J. Annu. Rep. Med.
Chem. 1998, 33, 121.
5. Ueda, H.; Shoku, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Mitsunaga, J.; In, Y.; Doi,
M.; Inoue, M.; Ishida, T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1080, 126.
6. Forrest, A. K.; Jarvest, R. L.; Mensah, L. M.; O’Hanlon,
P. J.; Pope, A. J.; Sheppard, R. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2000, 10, 1871.
7. Hill, J. M.; Yu, G.; Shue, Y.-K.; Zydowsky, T. M.; Rebek,
J. US Patent 5,726,195.
8. Heacock, D.; Forsyth, C. J.; Kiyotaka, S.; Musier-Forsyth,
K. Bioorg. Chem. 1996, 24, 273.
9. Belrhali, H.; Yaremchuk, A.; Tukalo, M.; Larsen, K.; Ber-
thet-Colominas, C.; Leberman, R.; Beijer, B.; Sproat, B.; Als-
Nielsen, J.; Grbel, G.; Legrand, J.-F.; Lehmann, M.; Cusack,
S. Science 1994, 263, 1432.
10. Brown, P.; Richardson, C. M.; Mensah, L. M.; O’Hanlon,
P. J.; Osborne, N. F.; Pope, A. J.; Walker, G. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 1999, 7, 2473.
11. Lee, J.; Kang, S. U.; Kang, M. K.; Chun, M. W.; Jo, Y. J.;
Kwak, J. H.; Kim, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1365.
12. Ohrui, H.; Jones, G. H.; Moffatt, J. G.; Maddox, M. L.;
Christensen, A. T.; Byram, S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97,
4602.
13. Arnez, J. G.; Moras, D. TIBS 1997, 22, 211.
14. Mechulam, Y.; Schmitt, E.; Maveyraud, L.; Zelwer, C.;
Nureki, O.; Yokoyama, S.; Konno, M.; Blanquet, S. J. Mol.
Biol. 1999, 294, 1287.
15. The structure of 23 was constructed using the molecular
modeling program Sybyl 6.6. Energy minimization was per-
formed using the Tripos force field and conjugate gradient
method until the rms energy gradient was below 0.005 kcal/
mol A on a Silicon Graphics INDIGO 2 workstation. The
charge was calculated by using the Gasteiger-Huckel method.
ˆ
In summary, the SAR on a series of ester and hydrox-
amate analogues of methionyl and isoleucyl adenylate
has been investigated through adenine surrogates bear-
ing carbon linkers between them and the 10-position of
ribose. In methionyl adenylate analogues, ester analo-
gues with a one-carbon linker appeared to be optimal
for the E. coli MetRS inhibitory activity, and 23
emerged as a potent candidate. SARs revealed that the
adenine binding site of E. coli MetRS would be a flex-
ible hydrophobic pocket large enough to afford bulky
adenine surrogates with one- or two-carbon linkers,
whose existence was examined by a modeling study. A
model of the E. coli MetRS active site derived from the
X-ray structure of the enzyme and inhibitor 23, was
proposed in order to explain the ligand–enzyme inter-
action. It will be helpful in the further study of the
receptor-guided inhibitor design.
˚
The energy-minimized structure of 23 was aligned to histidyl
adenylate (Arnez, J. G. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1997, 94, 7144) using GASP (Genetic Algorithm Similarity
Program, Tripos). During the calculation, the conformation of
histidyl adenylate was fixed as a reference structure.
16. Kim, H. Y.; Ghosh, G.; Schulman, L. H.; Brunie, S.;
Jakubowski, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 11553.