Organic Letters
Letter
We initiated our investigation using sodium 4-biphenylsulfi-
nate 1a as a model substrate, TMSCF3 as the fluorinated
reagent, and triphenylphosphine as the additive under a
nitrogen atmosphere (Table 1). No desired product was found
corresponding desired products in moderate to good yields
(Scheme 2). With the electron-donating substituents on the
Scheme 2. Transition-Metal-Free Indirect
Trifluoromethylthiolation of Monosubstituted Sodium
Arylsulfinate with TMSCF3
a
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
b
I2
PPh3
temp time yield
entry (equiv) (equiv)
additive
solvent
(°C)
(h)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
−
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
−
−
−
KF
KF
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
25
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
18
12
0
8
11
31
39
30
36
27
11
68
0
83
30
35
20
49
19
0
K3PO4
CS2CO3
Na2CO3
K2CO3
NaF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DMF
DMF
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
DMSO
DMAc
NMP
CH3CN
toluene
H2O
DMF
DMF
DMF
21
81
59
100
100
c
a
Reaction yields were determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy using
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), TMSCF3 (4.0 equiv), I2,
4,4′-difluorobiphenyl as the internal standard. Values in parentheses
PPh3, additive (4.0 equiv), 4,4′-difluorobiphenyl (0.1 mmol, internal
are isolated yields using column chromatography.
b
standard), solvent (1.5 mL). Yields determined by 19F NMR
c
spectroscopy based on 1a. Under air conditions.
aromatic ring such as aryl, alkyl, alkoxy, and methylthio, the
sodium arylsulfinate salts were well tolerated under the
reaction conditions to give the corresponding target products
with moderate to good yields of 43−83% (2a−2j). With a
halogen substituent on the aromatic ring such as Cl and Br, the
sodium arylsulfinate substrates can tolerate the reaction
system, providing the corresponding products in moderate
yields (2k and 2l in 34% and 44% yields, respectively).
Remarkably, the iodo group in substrate 1m can significantly
survive the standard reaction conditions, affording the desired
product 2m in a moderate yield of 52%. Compared with the
substrates with electron-donating substituents on the aromatic
ring, the sodium arylsulfinates with electron-withdrawing
substituents such as alkoxalyl, acetyl, cyano, and nitro (2n−
2v) afforded the desired products in slightly lower yields of
47−67%. In comparison with the nitro substituent in the para
(2t, 58%) and meta (2u, 52%) position, the slightly lower yield
from sodium arylsulfinate with the nitro substituent in the
ortho position (2v, 47%) indicated that steric effects have an
important influence on the reaction system.
in DMSO at 100 °C in the absence of the oxidant iodine or an
additive (Table 1, entry 1). To our delight, the desired product
(2a) was favorably detected in 8% yield in the presence of I2 at
100 °C, determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy with 4,4′-
difluorobiphenyl as the internal standard (entry 2). The
addition of KF as an additive was beneficial for improving the
reactivity, showing a slightly higher yield (entry 3). Compared
with additives KF, K3PO4, CS2CO3, Na2CO3, K2CO3, and NaF
(11−39%, entries 4−9, respectively), CsF is the best choice for
the reaction, providing the desired product 2a in the highest
yield (68%, entry 10). The investigation of oxidant I2 and PPh3
revealed that the optimum molar ratio of I2 to PPh3 is 1 to 1.2
for the reaction in 83% yield (entry 12). Among the polar or
less polar solvents (DMSO, DMAc, NMP, CH3CN, toluene,
and DMF, entries 12−17, respectively), the DMF solvent is the
best reaction conditions to form the product in 12 h.
Unfortunately, the desired product could not be obtained
using H2O as the solvent (entry 18). Although the reaction can
also be performed at room temperature, a higher temperature
of ≤100 °C is necessary for a high yield (Table 1, entry 19).
The reaction yield decreases dramatically in the presence of air
(entry 21).
Similarly, the polysubstituted sodium arylsulfinates with
more electron-donating substituents were well tolerated under
the standard reaction conditions to give the desired products in
higher yields than the corresponding monosubstituted sodium
arylsulfinates (Scheme 3a). With two more methyl groups in
the meta position on the aromatic ring, sodium 2,4,6-
With the optimal reaction conditions determined, the
substrate scope of sodium arylsulfinate was explored. All
monosubstituted sodium arylsulfinate substrates afforded the
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX