(representing ring fragment A) and the phenolic building
block 4, i.e., (R)-p-hydroxyphenylglycine 4 (the proposed
ring B portion). Because of its expected8 configurational
instability, the lactone-bridged biaryl 3 should be subject to
an atroposelective ring cleavage, using, e.g., chiral H-
nucleophiles, to give (P)-2 or, optionally, its (here not
required) atropodiastereomer (M)-2.9
BINAL-H” [(P)-14]16 as the chiral H-nucleophile.17 These
low selectivities already suggested that they might not
represent the actual levels of asymmetric induction as initially
produced in these reaction mixtures, but that at least some
loss of stereochemical purity might have occurred after the
reductive ring cleavage. Indeed, (P)-12 does isomerize slowly
at room temperature, eventually resulting in a ca. 1:1 mixture
of the two atropoisomers, (P)- and (M)-12. This stereochem-
ical lability of (P)-12 was not expected in view of the
configurational stability of structurally closely related biaryls
that bear (besides an OMe group instead of the OH
substituent in ring A) either another substituent in the
methylene unit or a larger, 16-membered ring instead of the
oxazolidine portion.18,19
Scheme 1
Figure 1. Vancomycin.
For a first synthetic approach along these lines, building
block 8 was chosen as a protected precursor for ring A. This
acid, easily obtained from 5 by iodination10 and saponifica-
tion, was esterified with 9, representing the precursor for
fragment B, which in turn was accessible from commercially
available 4 using a known procedure.11 As in so many cases
before,8,12,13 intramolecular coupling of 10 smoothly gave
the indeed configurationally labile lactone 11 in high yield
(90%). Interestingly, attempts to reductively cleave this
bridged key intermediate by previously successful8 borane
reduction in the presence of the chiral oxazaborolidine (S)-
1314 failed, apparently due to low steric hindrance at the
biaryl axis and, thus, a lack of strain-induced reactivity.15
The ring opening of 11 to give (P)-12 gave good chemical
yields but unusually low optical yields (dr 69:31) using “S-
Despite the configurational instability of 12, the good
chemical yields for both the intramolecular coupling of 10
to 11 and the subsequent ring cleavage, together with the
possibility of recycling the chromatographically separable
minor atropisomer (M)-12 (by a similarly almost quantitative,
one-step oxidation using MnO2, Scheme 2),20 still constituted
a clear proof of concept. Further efforts to synthesize a
hopefully configurationally stable AB-fragment were there-
fore warranted, the approach being to replace 9 with a
sterically more hindered building block.
(7) (a) Rama Rao, A. V.; Chakraborty, T. K.; Joshi, S. P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 4045-4048. (b) Rama Rao, A. V.; Reddy, K. L.; Reddy,
M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 35, 5039-5042. (c) Lipshutz, B. H.; Mu¨ller,
P.; Leinweber, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3677-3680. (d) Wilhelm,
R.; Widdowson, D. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3079-3082. (e) Nicolaou, K.
C.; Li, H.; Boddy, C. N. C.; Ramanjulu, J. M.; Yue, T. Y.; Natarajan, S.;
Chu, X.-J.; Bra¨se, S.; Ru¨bsam, R. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2584-2601. (f)
Boisnard, S.; Neuville, L.; Bois-Choussy, M.; Zhu, J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2459-2462. (g) Kamikawa, K.; Tachibana, A.; Sugimoto, S.; Uemura, M.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2033-2036.
(8) (a) Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M.; Tasler, S. Synthesis 1999, 4, 525-
558. (b) Bringmann, G.; Menche, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 615-624.
(9) For a very similar synthetic approach, albeit with only low coupling
yields and without considering the phenomenon of atropoisomerism, see
ref 7a.
(10) Sargent, M. V. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 2553-2564.
(11) Beugelmans, R.; Bois-Choussy, M.; Chastanet, J.; Gleuher, M. L.;
Zhu, J. Heterocycles 1993, 36, 2723-2732.
(12) (a) Hosoya, T.; Takashiro, E.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1004-1015. (b) Deshpande, P. P.; Martin, O. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 44, 6313-6316. (c) Matsumoto, T.; Hosoya, T.;
Suzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3568-3570.
A possible first candidate for this was the O-t-Bu-
substituted biaryl (P)-17 (Scheme 3). Starting from benzoic
(16) Noyori, R.; Tomino, I.; Tanimoto, Y.; Nishizawa, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 6709-6716.
(17) For elucidation of the configuration of (P)-12 by quantum chemical
CD calculations, see Supporting Information.
(18) Structurally closely related and sterically only slightly more hindered
but configurationally stable biaryls are described in refs 7e and 7g.
(19) For atropoisomerization of related biaryls, see refs 5a and 5e.
(20) For a related oxidative recycling back to a lactone intermediate,
see: Bringmann, G.; Menche, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1687-
1690.
(13) In comparison to 10, coupling of the analogous bromoacid proceeded
with only 26% yield; see ref 7a.
(14) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986-
2012.
(15) Bringmann, G.; Hinrichs, J.; Kraus, J.; Wuzik, A.; Schulz, T. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2508-2516.
2834
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 17, 2002