Antiviral Evaluation of Cycloviracin B
A R T I C L E S
1
Table 2. Comparison of the 13C NMR Data Recorded in
stereoisomers (E:Z ) 1:1). This result shows that the ester
groups and the acidic protons adjacent to them can survive under
the chosen reaction conditions. Not surprisingly though, any
excess of the base must be strictly avoided. Moreover, it was
found that the use of either NaHMDS or KHMDS for the
deprotonation of sulfone 60 leads to significantly larger amounts
of unidentified byproducts. Although the outcome of this
experiment is not fully satisfactory in terms of yield, it suggests
that a Julia-Kocienski olefination should qualify for the delicate
assembly of cycloviracin B1 from the individual building blocks.
Completion of the Total Synthesis. Encouraged by the
results of this exploratory study, the (3R,3′R)-configured lactide
15 was desymmetrized by cleavage of both terminal silyl groups
followed by introduction of a single OTBDPS group (15 f 16
f 17, cf. Scheme 4). This protocol turned out to be more
productive than attempts to remove only one silyl ether from
15. Conversion of alcohol 17 to sulfide 62 on treatment with
commercial 1-phenyl-1H-tetrazole-5-thiol and PBu352 proceeds
with excellent yield, whereas the subsequent oxidation to the
corresponding sulfone 63 turned out to be somewhat more
difficult than expected (Scheme 14). Due to the poor solubility
of 62 in EtOH as the preferred solvent, the oxidation with H2O2
in the presence of (NH4)6Mo7O24‚4H2O53 had to be carried out
in a mixed solvent system (EtOH/CH2Cl2) which significantly
retards the reaction and occasionally leads to incomplete
conversions. Under optimized conditions, however, sulfone 63
is obtained in 67% yield.
With this compound in hand, the crucial Julia-Kocienski
olefination49-51 was investigated. Gratifyingly, addition of
aldehyde 58 to a solution of the lithio sulfone derived from 63
by deprotonation with LiHMDS in DME at -78 °C and stirring
of the mixture at that temperature for 60 min delivers the
corresponding alkene 64 in 61% yield (E:Z ∼ 1:1), which was
hydrogenated over Pd/C in EtOAc to give product 65 in order
to facilitate the analysis of the NMR spectra. We are unaware
of any precedence for Julia-type olefination reactions involving
sulfones bearing such base-labile and electrophilic â-hydroxy
ester motifs as those present in compound 63.
Pyridine-d5 for the Synthetic Sample of Cycloviracin B1 (150 MHz)
with Those Reported for the Natural Product (100 MHz).1 As Can
Be Seen, the ∆δ Is e0.1 ppm, Which Is within Experimental
Accuracy. Arbitrary Numbering Scheme as Shown in the Insert
position
1,1
2,2
3,3
19
25
26
27,25
28,26
29,27
30,28
31,29
32,30
17
22
23
24
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
2A-OMe
1B
2B
3B
4B
5B
6B
2B-OMe
1C
2C
3C
4C
5C
literature
synthetic sample
171.7
42.4
78.9
79.3
74.2
19.5
106.4
75.1
78.3
72.1
74.5
65.3
79.3
40.1
67.0
24.3
103.1
85.3
77.7
71.8
78.0
62.9
60.7
101.8
85.0
77.6
71.7
78.0
62.8
60.6
103.1
85.3
77.7
71.8
78.1
62.9
60.7
171.7
42.5
78.9
79.3
74.2
19.5
106.5
75.2
78.3
72.1
74.6
65.4
79.3
40.2
67.0
24.3
103.1
85.3
77.8
71.9
78.0
62.9
60.8
101.8
85.1
77.7
71.8
78.0
68.9
60.6
103.2
85.4
77.8
71.9
78.1
62.9
60.8
(51) See the following for leading references on the applications of Julia-
Kocienski olefination reactions to the total synthesis of complex targets:
(a) Kang, S. H.; Jeong, J. W.; Hwang, Y. S.; Lee, S. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1392. (b) Lee, E.; Song, H. Y.; Kang, J. W.; Kim, D.-S.;
Jung, C.-K.; Joo, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 384. (c) Lee, E.;
Choi, S. J.; Kim, H.; Han, H. O.; Kim, Y. K.; Min, S. J.; Son, S. H.; Lim,
S. M.; Jang, W. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 176. (d) Liu, P.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10772. (e) Smith, A. B.;
Safonov, I. G.; Corbett, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12426. (f)
Smith, A. B.; Brandt, B. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1685. (g) Mulzer, J.; O¨ hler,
E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3842. (h) Takano, D.; Nagamitsu, T.;
Ui, H.; Shiomi, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Masuma, R.; Kuwajima, I.; Omura, S.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2289. (i) Williams, D. R.; Cortez, G. S.; Bogen, S. L.;
Rojas, C. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4612. (j) Harris, J. M.;
O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2983. (k) Williams D. R.; Clark, M.
P.; Emde, U.; Berliner, M. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3023. (l) Metternich, R.;
Denni, D.; Thai, B.; Sedrani, R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9632. (m) Lear,
M. J.; Hirama, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4897. (n) Williams, D. R.;
Brooks, D. A.; Berliner, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4924. (o)
Smith, A. B.; Wan, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3738. (p) Lautens, M.;
Colucci, J. T.; Hiebert, S.; Smith, N. D.; Bouchain, G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
1879. (q) Hayes, P. Y.; Kitching, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9718.
(r) Ahmed, A.; Hoegenauer, E. K.; Enev, V. S.; Hanbauer, M.; Kaehlig,
H.; O¨ hler, E.; Mulzer, J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3026.
6C
2C-OMe
acidity together with the better accessibility of a terminal
tetrazolyl sulfone should allow for a selective deprotonation by
means of a sterically encumbered base without damaging the
C-H acidic groups on the lactide ring; the stabilized nature of
lithiated sulfones in general is well documented in the litera-
ture.51
To probe the viability of this concept, a model study was
carried out commencing with compound 12 (Scheme 13).
Deprotection of its terminal TBDPS-ether with TBAF in THF
is followed by conversion of the resulting primary alcohol into
sulfide 59, which is then oxidized to the required sulfone 60.50
Selective deprotonation of 60 at the sulfone site with LiHMDS
at -78 °C in DME as the best solvent followed by addition of
aldehyde 58 at that temperature furnishes the desired alkene 61
in 45% isolated yield as an inseparable mixture of both
(52) (a) Hata, T.; Sekine, M. Chem. Lett. 1974, 837. (b) Nakagawa, I.; Aki, K.;
Hata, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 1315. (c) Fu¨rstner, A. Liebigs
Ann. Chem. 1993, 1211.
(53) Schultz, H. S.; Feyermuth, H. B.; Buc, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1140.
(54) See the following for general reviews on diorganozinc addition reactions
to aldehydes: (a) refs 18a and 38c. (b) Soai, K.; Niwa, S. Chem. ReV.
1992, 92, 833. (c) Soai, K.; Shibata, T. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric
Catalysis, Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer, Berlin,
1999; Vol. 2; pp 911-922.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 43, 2003 13141