Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
1
2
3
4
In addition, as an ionic ligand with high polarity, L6-based Ir-
catalyst could be precipitated by n-hexane upon completion to fulfil
the recovery and recycling uses of transition metal catalysts. As
demonstrated(see S. Fig. 4 in ESI), the catalyst could be recycled 7
runs. The ICP-OES analysis indicated that the leaching of Ir and P
elements in the combined extract was non-detectable (below the
detection limit of 0.1 g/g). The decreased activity of the catalyst in
the third run and afterwards was mainly due to the physical loss
during the transfer of the catalyst. The deactivation of the catalyst
was not observed since the reaction solution was always clear and
yellow without precipitation of metal blacks.
Chemicals, Wiley-Interscience, New YorkD, 2OnI:d10E.d10it3io9/nC.,82C0C0043.431A
A. M. Johns, M. Utsunomiya, C. D. Incarvito and J. F. Hartwig, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1828–1839.
M. Utsunomiya and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
2702–2703.
C. Bornschein, S. Werkmeister, B. Wendt, H. Jiao, E. Alberico, W.
Baumann, H. Junge, K. Junge and M. Beller, Nat. Commun., 2014,
5, 4111.
R. Reguillo, M. Grellier, N. Vautravers, L. Vendier and S. Sabo-
Etienne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7854–7855.
S. Shekhar, P. Ryberg, J. F. Hartwig, J. S. Mathew, D. G.
Blackmond, E. R. Strieter and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 3584–3591.
O. Navarro, N. Marion, J. Mei and S. P. Nolan, Chem.-Eur. J., 2006,
12, 5142–5148.
G. E. Dobereiner and R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 681–
703.
H. Liu, D.-L. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Lu, X.-L. Zhao and Y. Liu, Green
Chem., 2017, 19, 1109–1116.
5
6
The scope of hydroaminomethylation catalysed by L6-based
Ir-catalyst was explored (see S. Table 2 in ESI). It was found that,
as for the linear aliphatic -olefins, the increased carbon chains
7
8
9
led to the decreased reaction rate obviously. For example, 1-
heptene, 1-octene and 1-dodecene afforded 80~86% yields of
the products while 1-hexene corresponded to 93% yield (Entries
2-5 vs 1). The internal aliphatic olefins such as 2-octene and
cyclooctene led to very low yields of the amines due to the bulky
steric hindrance (Entries 6 and 7). When styrene and its
derivatives were applied to repeat the reactions at the
prolonged time of 48 h, styrene gave 80% yield of the
corresponding amines whereas styrene derivatives with para-
positioned substituents afforded the lower yields of the
products due to the obvious steric and electronic effects
(Entries 8-13). Unfortunately, the uses of the other amines
instead of N-methylaniline to perform hydroaminomethylation
of 1-hexene universally resulted in the drop of the product
yields (Entries 14 and 15).
10 S. Bhattacharyya, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 4928–4929.
11 T. Mizuta, S. Sakaguchi and Y. Ishii, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 2195–
2199.
12 P. Eilbracht, L. Bärfacker, C. Buss, C. Hollmann, B. E. Kitsos-
Rzychon, C. L. Kranemann, T. Rische, R. Roggenbuck and A.
Schmidt, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 3329–3366.
13 X.-F. Wu, X. Fang, L. Wu, R. Jackstell, H. Neumann and M. Beller,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 1041–1053.
14 W. Reppe and H. Vetter, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1953, 582, 133–163.
15 P. Kalck and M. Urrutigoïty, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 3833–3861.
16 C. Chen, S. Jin, Z. Zhang, B. Wei, H. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Lv, X.-Q.
Dong and X. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 9017–9020.
17 L. Wu, I. Fleischer, R. Jackstell and M. Beller, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2013, 135, 3989–3996.
18 S. Gülak, L. Wu, Q. Liu, R. Franke, R. Jackstell and M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 7320–7323.
19 J. Liu, C. Kubis, R. Franke, R. Jackstell and M. Beller, ACS Catal.,
2016, 6, 907–912.
20 B. Zimmermann, J. Herwig and M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
1999, 38, 2372–2375.
21 B. Gall, M. Bortenschlager, O. Nuyken and R. Weberskirch,
Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2008, 209, 1152–1159.
22 C. Margarita and P. G. Andersson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139,
1346–1356.
23 B. Tutkowski, S. Kerdphon, E. Limé, P. Helquist, P. G. Andersson,
O. Wiest and P.-O. Norrby, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 615–623.
24 D. M. Vandenberg, T. M. Suzuki and P. C. Ford,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1984, 272, 309–320.
Conclusions
L6-based Ir-catalyst was proved highly efficient and recyclable
for hydroaminomethylation of different olefins by using H2O as
hydrogen source for the first time. In this protocol, the use of
H2O as the hydrogen source instead of H2 was advantageous to
depress the side-reaction of hydrogenation of olefins. L6, as an
ionic π-acceptor diphosphine with insensitivity to water and
oxygen, rendered the Ir-catalyst high activity towards
hydroaminomethylation and good longevity. The in situ high
pressure FT-IR analysis indicated that over L6-based Ir-catalyst,
the formation and stability of Ir-H active species (
2078 cm-1)
was favored, which was responsible for the key step of
hydorformylation in the hydroaminomethylation. In addition,
the high polarity of L6 as an ionic compound also facilitated the
recyclability of the homogeneous Ir-catalyst.
25 J. Lin, A. Wang, B. Qiao, X. Liu, X. Yang, X. Wang, J. Liang, J. Li, J.
Liu and T. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 15314–15317.
26 A. Erkkilä, I. Majander and P. M. Pihko, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
5416–5470.
Acknowledgement
27 A. Suárez, M. A. Méndez-Rojas and A. Pizzano, Organometallics,
2002, 21, 4611–4621.
28 S. Jeulin, S. Duprat de Paule, V. Ratovelomanana-Vidal, J.-P.
Genêt, N. Champion and P. Dellis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 320–325.
This work was financially supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21673077 and 21473058),
and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai
Municipality (18JC1412100).
29 S.-J. Chen, Y.-Q. Li, Y.-Y. Wang, X.-L. Zhao and Y. Liu,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2015, 396, 68–76.
30 T. Miyao, A. Yoshida, H. Yamada and S. Naito,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2013, 378, 174–178.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Notes and references
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins