A R T I C L E S
Jørgensen et al.
However, the scope of these reactions was narrow, the yields
were variable, and the procedures involved separate preparation
of zinc enolates, tin enolates, or silylketene acetals prior to the
arylation reaction in all three cases. The coupling of aryl boronic
acids with R-bromo acetates under Suzuki-Miyaura conditions
was reported recently by Goossen.28
Over the past few years, we and others have developed
palladium-catalyzed procedures for the R-arylation of ketones,29-38
malonates,31,34,39 and cyanoacetates,39 as well as the preparation
of oxindoles by an intramolecular amide R-arylation.40,41 The
coupling of aryl halides with ester enolates would provide easy
access to R-aryl esters, including precursors to R-aryl propionic
acids such as Ibuprofen, Ketoprofen, Naproxen, and Flurbipro-
fen, which are used extensively in the treatment of inflammatory
diseases and for the relief of pain.42,43
The palladium-catalyzed R-arylation of esters47 was reported
independently by Buchwald48 with biphenylphosphines and by
our group49 with both carbene and trialkylphosphine ligands.
Miura earlier reported three reactions of phenyl iodide or
bromide with methyl phenylacetate in low to modest yield with
PPh3-ligated palladium or ligandless palladium.36 Buchwald’s
procedure required 2 equiv of ester relative to the aryl halide,
and the coupling was conducted at elevated temperatures with
relatively high catalyst loadings (3 mol %, 70 °C). Miura’s
reactions were conducted at an even higher 100-130 °C. We
found that reactions with only a slight excess of ester occurred
at room temperature in the presence of 2 mol % Pd(dba)2 and
heterocyclic carbene precursor N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphen-
yl)4,5-dihydroimidazolium (1) or P(t-Bu)3, but an excess of ester
and base was required for the arylation of R,R-disubstituted
esters. We now present a full account of the arylations of esters
with carbene precursor 1 and P(t-Bu)3. These studies produced
improved protocols that increased the scope and efficiency of
the arylation of tert-butyl acetate and R,R-disubstituted esters
and addressed mechanistic issues about the origin of the high
selectivity from the arylation of tert-butyl acetate.
Results and Discussion
1.1. Conditions for the r-Arylation of tert-Butyl Acetate
and Scope of the Coupling. Successful arylation of acetates
required careful selection of ester, solvent, base, and ligand.50
Because most acetate enolates are unstable, we focused our
effort on reactions of tert-butyl acetate that forms an enolate
that is stable in solution for several hours at room tempera-
ture.45,46 We initially tested a variety of ligands for the reaction
of this ester with 4-tert-butylbromobenzene in the presence of
alkali metal tert-butoxide and hexamethyldisilylamide bases,
which had been used previously for the arylation of ketones
and amides. Screening of the ligands was conducted with 2.3
equiv of base to ensure that the base or starting enolate would
not be fully quenched by the more acidic product during the
reaction. Reactions catalyzed by Pd(dba)2 and carbene ligand
precursor 1 occurred in quantitative yields without formation
of the diarylation product when this excess quantity of lithium
hexamethyldisilazide was used as base. These couplings oc-
curred in the highest yields in aromatic solvents. No product
was formed in ether solvents.
We showed recently that the rates and yields for reductive
elimination from arylpalladium enolate complexes were similar
for complexes of enolates derived from ketones, esters, or
amides.44 Because the coupling step occurred from complexes
of ketone and ester enolates with similar rates and yields and
R-arylations of ketones occurred in a general fashion,29-33,35-38
it seemed that a general coupling of ester enolates would occur
if the palladium enolate could be generated in high yield. Rathke
showed many years ago that tert-butyl esters generate more
stable enolates than less hindered alkyl esters.45,46 Thus, we
initiated our studies with tert-butyl acetate and propionate as
substrate. Effective arylation would require that the catalytic
coupling occur faster than any decomposition or condensation
of the alkali metal enolate. As a result, the recently developed,
highly efficient catalysts for coupling reactions proved critical
to the development of clean arylation of esters.
A few of the biaryldialkylphosphines developed by Buchwald
gave yields above 90% under similar conditions, but none we
tested were as effective as the carbene generated from 1.
Complexes of PCy(t-Bu)2, PCy2(t-Bu), and PAd2(n-Bu)51,52
catalyzed the coupling in slightly lower yields that ranged from
80 to 88%, while reactions catalyzed by complexes of P(t-
Bu)353,54 or several of the adamantyl ligands were less selective
for formation of the monoarylation product when this base was
used.55,56 Reactions attempted with carbene precursor 1 and tert-
(28) Goossen, L. J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 669.
(29) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12382.
(30) Saughnessy, K. H.; Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
6546.
(31) Kawatsura, M.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1473.
(32) Palucki, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11108.
(33) A° hman, J.; Wolfe, J. P.; Troutman, M. V.; Palucki, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1918.
(34) Fox, J. M.; Huang, X. H.; Chieffi, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 1360.
(35) Satoh, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1997, 36, 1740.
(36) Satoh, T.; Inoh, J.-I.; Kawamura, Y.; Kawamura, Y.; Miura, M.; Nomura,
M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 2239.
(47) Lloyd-Jones, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 953.
(48) Moradi, W. A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7996.
(49) Lee, S.; Beare, N. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8410.
(50) Tables of data from screening of these reaction parameters are included in
the Supporting Information.
(37) Sole´, D.; Vallverdu´, L.; Peidro´, E.; Bonjoch, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1888.
(38) Sole´, D.; Vallverdu´, L.; Bonjoch, J. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 430.
(39) Beare, N. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 541.
(40) Lee, S.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3402.
(41) Shaughnessy, K.; Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
6546.
(51) Ehrentraut, A.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 209.
(52) Zapf, A.; Ehrentraut, A.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4153-
4155.
(42) Harrington, P. J.; E., L. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1997, 1, 72.
(43) Mongin, F.; Maggi, R.; Schlosser, M. Chimica 1996, 50, 650.
(44) Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5816.
(45) Rathke, M. W.; Lindert, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 2318.
(46) Rathke, M. W.; Sullivan, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3050.
(53) Hartwig, J. F.; Kawatsura, M.; Hauck, S. I.; Shaughnessy, K. H.; Alcazar-
Roman, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5575.
(54) Watanabe, M.; Nishiyama, M.; Koie, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8837-
8840.
9
12558 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 42, 2002