1994
Y.-J. Wu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1991–1995
The mechanism of action of (S)-2 is in large part a hyper-
polarizing shift in the voltage dependence of activation of
the KCNQ2 conductance. In addition, the instanta-
neous kinetics of activation observed in the presence of
(S)-2 are strikingly different from the activation kinetics
of non-treated cells, which implies that (S)-2 converts
KCNQ2 channels from being strongly voltage-depen-
dent to a conformational state essentially devoid of
voltage-dependence in the physiological membrane
potential range. In any given neuron where natively
expressed KCNQ2 channels contribute significantly to
setting and maintaining the resting membrane potential,
one might expect (S)-2 to hyperpolarize and therefore
essentially clamp the membrane potential close to E+K .
The net effect of this would be that any such neurons
would become electrically ‘silent’. Such a mechanism of
action of (S)-2 would be entirely consistent with its
ability to strongly inhibit the firing frequency of hippo-
campal neurons described in this report. Interestingly,
the mode switch in activation kinetics produced by (S)-2
is similar to that observed with (S)-1,7 but importantly
(S)-2, unlike (S)-1, does not significantly inhibit
KCNQ2 conductance at positive membrane potentials,
which could simplify its physiological effects in the
CNS. Direct electrophysiological recordings from neu-
rons expressing KCNQ currents should be able to dis-
tinguish the functional significance of not inhibiting
KCNQ conductance at positive potentials.
in Table 1, the potency appears to increase as the alkyl
substituent attached to the oxazine nitrogen becomes
bulkier. Interestingly, the size of the alkyl group has lit-
tle impact to the efficacy of these analogues with the
exception of the unsubstituted analogue (S)-7. Of spe-
cial note is that the (R)-2 exhibited no KCNQ2 opener
activity when tested at 10 mM, whereas (S)-2 is a highly
potent and efficacious KCNQ2 opener, suggesting that
the S configuration may play an important role in
opening KCNQ2 channels for this series of acrylamides.
Preliminary studies using thallium(I) influx assay7
showed that compounds (S)-2, (S)-7, 8, and 9, like (S)-
1,7 also activated other members of the KCNQ family.
Further electrophysiological characterization is required
in order to understand the activation of other KCNQ
channels.
Compound (S)-2 was examined for its ability to reduce
spontaneous neuronal discharges in rat hippocampal
slices. In this assay, the induction of spontaneous neu-
ronal bursting was achieved by bathing slices to an
artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) containing zero
magnesium (MgSO4) and low calcium (CaCl2 1.5 mM).
The resulting multiple-unit extracellular electrical activ-
ity was recorded by advancing an electrode 50–150 mm
into the CA1 region of the hippocampus. This electrical
activity was then amplified using a differential amplifier,
and the number of events per min was collected and
analyzed. The analyzed data was expressed in Hz and
reported as percent inhibition of compound free con-
trol. Figure 5A depicts the multi-unit response of a sin-
gle hippocampal slice to the application of (R)-2
(inactive enantiomer), (S)-2 (active enantiomer) and (S)-
2 in the presence of linopirdine, a KCNQ blocker.
Application of (R)-2 (2.5 mM) did not provide any
reduction on the neuronal bursting, whereas addition of
(S)-2 (2.5 mM) resulted in a significant inhibition on
neuronal hyperexcitability. After maximal inhibition by
(S)-2 was achieved, the KCNQ blocker linopirdine (10
mM) was applied concurrently with (S)-2 (2.5 mM).
Complete reversal of the (S)-2 mediated inhibition was
produced by co-application in this example.
Whole-cell patch-clamp evaluation on recombinant
mouse KCNQ2 channels expressed in HEK 293 cells
demonstrates that (S)-2 is a potent and efficacious
opener of KCNQ2 channels. As shown in Table 1, (S)-2
has an improved potency over (S)-1 and retigabine by a
factor of ꢁ55-fold and 22-fold, respectively. The effi-
cacies of test compounds were normalized to the efficacy
of a specific reference compound,12 to yield an E/Eref
ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the maximum
current amplitude produced by the test compound by
the maximum current amplitude produced by the refer-
ence compound. The benefit of using an E/Eref value is
that it allows ranking of compound efficacies indepen-
dent of the amount of basal KCNQ2 current expression.
The E/Eref’s of (S)-2, (S)-1 and retigabine are 1.83,
1.40, and 1.60, respectively (Table 1). Thus, (S)-2 is 31%
and 14% more efficacious in opening KCNQ2 channels
than (S)-1 and retigabine, respectively.
In order to establish a concentration–response curve for
(S)-2 (Fig. 5B), slices were exposed to a range of con-
centrations (100 nM–2.5 mM). A minimum of 12 slices
were used for each compound concentration. The EC50
calculated for (S)-2 was 0.70 mM. It should be noted
that (R)-2 had no effect on neuronal discharge when
tested at the concentration producing maximal inhibi-
tion by (S)-2 (2.5 mM) (Fig. 5B), which is consistent with
the inability of this concentration of (R)-2 to activate
KCNQ2 expressed in HEK 293 cells (data not shown).
Concurrent application of (S)-2 (2.5 mM) and lino-
pirdine (10 mM) significantly reduced the inhibition
relative to (S)-2 (2.5 mM) alone (Fig. 5B).
The above EC50 measurements were also carried out on
several analogues structurally related to (S)-2. As shown
Table 1. Whole cell patch-clamping data (À40 mV)
Compd
EC50 (mM)a
E/Erefa,b
(S)-1
(S)-2
8
9
(S)-7
Retigabine
3.28Æ0.05
0.06Æ0.01
0.20Æ0.02
0.94Æ0.14
2.0Æ0.1
1.40Æ0.06
1.83Æ0.02
2.1Æ0.3
1.8Æ0.2
1.2Æ0.1
We have hypothesized that a KCNQ opener would be
efficacious in reducing the induced neuronal hyperexcit-
ability in rat hippocampal slices, by virtue of increasing
K+ efflux from the cells, stabilizing the cell membrane,
and thus making it harder for depolarizing stimuli to
1.30Æ0.04
1.60Æ0.05
a These values are the meanÆSEM (n=2–5).
b The efficacy of the test compound relative to the reference com-
pound.12