C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2. Silica-Gel-Mediated Cyclization of the Nitroso Ene
Products 2 to the Isoxazolidinones 5, Reduction to the
Corresponding â-Amino Acids 8, and Determination of the
Configurations by Chemical Correlation
the sulfonyl groups with the double bond substituents. For this well-
locked conformation, the C(â)-re attack15 of the enophile is favored,
whereas the C(â)-si attack is efficiently shielded by the sulfonyl
oxygen atoms.16 By employing the sterically more demanding
isopropyl derivative 1b, the diastereoselectivity is increased, and
1
even for O2 exclusively one diastereomer was obtained. This is
the first example of absolute diastereoselectivity in 1O2 ene reaction
controlled by steric effects. Moreover, the high ene reactivity of
the “electron-poor” double bond in the tiglic sulfonamides toward
the enophiles, particularly ArNO, may be reconciled by the twisted
conformation of the double bond and the carbonyl functionality,
which reduces conjugation between the carbonyl group and the CC
double bond17 sufficiently such that the ene reactions proceed in
high yield.
In conclusion, this asymmetric allylic heteroatom functionaliza-
tion of the readily available tiglic sultams 1a,b provides an efficient
and economical route to valuable optically active building blocks.
Moreover, since both enantiomers of the bornane auxiliary are easily
accessible from (+)- and (-)-camphor, both stereoisomers of the
ene product are available.8 The cumbersome conventional synthesis
of the â-amino acid 9a in seven steps in only 5% overall yield and
93% enantiomeric purity (Scheme 2) emphasizes the convenience
and advantage of the present synthetic concept.
Scheme 3. Preferred Conformation of the Olefin in the π-Facially
Diastereoselective Enophilic Attack of ArNO, PTAD, and 1O2
Acknowledgment. The generous financial support by the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Schwerpunkt) and the
Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully appreciated.
Supporting Information Available: Structure matrix and experi-
mental section (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the
â-hydroxy ester rac-7a, which included lipase-catalyzed kinetic
resolution of the hydroxy ester in an enantiomeric excess of 93%.
Arylation of the ammonium salt (R)-9a afforded the â-amino acid
(R)-8a.13 The optical rotations ([R]D ) +2.4°) of the â-amino acid
8a, derived from the ene product 2a, and the authentic material
(R)-8a matched perfectly in sign and extent. To confirm the
authenticity and the enantiomeric purity of the isoxazolidinone 5a,
obtained from the ene product 2a, the racemic sample rac-5a was
required for chiral HPLC analysis. The latter was prepared by
cyclization of the racemic ene product of ArNO with methyl tiglate
(cf. Supporting Information). The isopropyl derivatives 5b and 8b
are also R-configured, since their optical rotations (5b -381.7°;
8b +4.9°) match those of the methyl derivatives 5a (-421.7°) and
8a (+2.4°). Thus, in the ene reaction of ArNO with the tiglic amides
1a,b, the like diastereomers lk-2a,b were exclusively formed.
The mechanistic rationalization of the very high diastereoselec-
tivity in the ene reaction for all three enophiles ArNO, PTAD, and
1O2 requires knowledge of the preferred conformation of the
bornane-derived tiglic-acid sultamides. Informative in this regard
is the known X-ray structure of tigloyl sultam 1a,14 and we assume
that the preferred ground-state conformation in the crystalline state
also applies in solution, to account for the observed selectivity in
the π-facial attack (Scheme 3). The carbonyl group points away
from the sulfonyl functionality, due to mutual electrostatic repulsion
and the steric interaction between the CC double bond substituents
and the bornane skeleton (C-N rotation). Furthermore, the carbonyl
group and the double-bond possess the s-trans conformation (C-C
rotation) about the clockwise-twisted C(R)-CO bond (the dihedral
angle is 46° in the X-ray structure). This conformation results from
the balance between the steric interactions of the carbonyl and of
References
(1) (a) Clennan, E. L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9151-9179. (b) Johannsen, M.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1689-1708.
(2) (a) Adam, W.; Bottke, N.; Krebs, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6791-
6792. (b) Adam, W.; Bottke, N.; Krebs, O.; Engels, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5542-5548.
(3) Adam, W.; Bottke, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9846-9847.
(4) Adam, W.; Bottke, N.; Krebs, O.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 1963-1965.
(5) (a) Jones, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 1-21. (b) Adam, W.;
Peters, K.; Schambony, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7610-7611.
(c) Kim, B. H.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 293-318.
(6) (a) Seebach, D.; Overhand, M.; Ku¨hnle, F. N. M.; Martinoni, B.; Oberer,
L.; Hommel, U.; Widmer, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 913-945. (b)
Cole, D. C. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9517-9582. (c) Gademann, K.;
Seebach, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2924-2937.
(7) (a) Smith, M. B. Methods of Non-R-Amino Acid Synthesis; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1995. (b) Juaristi, E. EnantioselectiVe Synthesis of
â-Amino Acids; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997.
(8) (a) Oppolzer, W.; Poli, G.; Kingma, A. J.; Starkemann, C.; Bernardinelli,
G. HelV. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 2201-2214. (b) Oppolzer, W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 876-890.
(9) (a) Adam, W.; Wirth, T.; Pastor, A.; Peters, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
501-506. (b) Wirth, T. Dissertation, University of Wu¨rzburg, 1998.
(10) (a) Adam, W.; Hoch, U.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R.; Schreier, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1737-1739. (b) Adam, W.; Fell, R. T.; Hoch,
U.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R.; Schreier, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6,
1047-1050. (c) Hoch, U. Dissertation, University of Wu¨rzburg, 1996.
(11) Drewes, S. E.; Hoole, R. F. A. Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 1067-1074.
(12) (a) Adam, W.; Groer, P.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
4919-4922. (b) Groer, P. Dissertation, University of Wu¨rzburg, 2000.
(13) Zyss, J.; Nicoud, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 4160-4167.
(14) Oppolzer, W.; Poli, G.; Starkemann, C.; Bernardinelli, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1988, 29, 3559-3562.
(15) Since only one stereogenic center is formed in these ene reactions, namely
at the â position of the CC double bond, the descriptor for the π-face
attack refers to the â-carbon atom.
(16) Curran, D. P.; Kim, B. H.; Daugherty, J.; Heffner, T. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1988, 29, 3555-3558.
(17) Curran, D. P.; Heffner, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4585-4595.
JA026640E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 44, 2002 12939