J. Ning et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7349–7352
7351
Couplings of
2
with perbenzoyl arabinofuranosyl
4. Yamada, H. In Bioactive Carbohydrate Polymers, Pro-
ceedings of the Phythochemical Society of Europe;
Paulsen, B. S., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000;
Vol. 44, pp. 37–46.
5. (a) Sussex, I. M. Cell 1989, 56, 225; (b) Kreuger, M.; van
Host, G. J. Planta 1993, 189, 243; (c) Kreuger, M.; van
Host, G. J. Planta 1994, 197, 135; (d) Egertsdotter, U.;
Von Arnold, S. Physiol. Plant 1995, 93, 334; (e) Roberts,
K. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 1990, 2, 920; (f) Showalter, A.
M.; Varner, J. E. In The Biochemistry of Plants; Stumpf,
P. K.; Conn, E. E., Eds.; Academic: New York, 1989;
Vol. 15, p. 485.
6. (a) Gu, G.; Yang, F.; Du, Y.; Kong, F. Carbohydr. Res.
2001, 336, 99; (b) Du, Y.; Pan, Q.; Kong, F. Carbohydr.
Res. 2000, 323, 28.
7. (a) Jarosz, S.; Krajewski, J. W.; Zamojski, A.; Duddeck,
H.; Kaiser, M. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Chem. 1985, 33, 181;
(b) De Jongh, D. C.; Biemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1964, 86, 67.
8. (a) Morgenlie, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1973, 27, 3609; (b)
Morgenlie, S. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 1975, 29, 367.
9. Rauter, A. P.; Ramoa-Riberio, F.; Fernanders, A. C.;
Figueiredo, J. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6529.
10. (a) Acree, T. E.; Shallenberger, R. S.; Lee, C. Y.; Einset,
J. W. Carbohydr. Res. 1969, 10, 355; (b) Acree, T. E.;
Shallenberger, R. S.; Mattick, L. R. Carbohydr. Res.
1968, 6, 498.
trichloroacetimidate 46 and perbenzoyl galactopyranos-
yl trichloroacetimidate 511 in the presence of
TMSOTf (0.01 equiv.) as catalyst, followed by selective
5,6-O-deacetonation afforded b-(13)-linked disaccha-
rides 8 and 9, respectively, as solids in high yields
(80–85% for the two steps) (Scheme 2). Condensation
of 5 with 8 and 9 catalyzed by TMSOTf regio- and
stereoselectively gave the 3,6-branched trisaccharides 11
and 12, respectively, in excellent yields (85–90%). Simi-
larly, the 6%%-O-trityl trisaccharide 13 was obtained by
coupling
2,3,4-tri-O-benzoyl-6-O-trityl-a-D-galacto-
pyranosyl trichloroacetimidate 1012 with 8 in an excel-
lent yield (87%). Removal of the 1,2-O-isopropylidene
group of 11 and 12 in 80% HOAc followed by acetyla-
tion with acetic anhydride in pyridine, selective 1-O-
deacetylation with ammonia in THF/CH3OH, and
subsequent treatment with trichloroacetonitrile in the
presence of K2CO3 afforded the trisaccharide glycosyl
donors 14 and 15 in good yields (71–74% over the four
steps). Selective 6-O-detritylation of 13 in CH2Cl2 with
FeCl3 gave the trisaccharide acceptor 16 in a high yield
(90%).13 Coupling of 14 with 16 using TMSOTf as the
catalyst regio- and stereoselectively afforded the
blocked hexasaccharide 17 in a high yield (84%), while
condensation of 15 with 1,2:3,4-di-O-isopropylidene-a-
D
-galactopyranose 3 gave the blocked tetrasaccharide
18 in an excellent yield (91%).14 Deisopropylidenation
of 17 and 18 in 80% HOAc, followed by deacetylation
in an ammonia-saturated solution in 1:1 CH2Cl2/
CH3OH, furnished the free hexasaccharide 19 and tetra-
saccharide 20, which are related to AGs, as amorphous
white solids in 92% and 93% yields, respectively (for the
two steps).
11. Rio, S.; Beau, J. M.; Jacquinet, J. C. Carbohydr. Res.
1991, 219, 71.
12. Yu, B.; Xie, J.; Deng, S.; Hui, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 12196.
13. Ding, X.; Wang, W.; Kong, F. Carbohydr. Res. 1997,
303, 445.
14. All new compounds gave satisfactory elemental analysis
results. Selected physical data for some key compounds
1
In all of the syntheses, easily accessible materials and
cheap reagents were used and the reactions were carried
out smoothly in high yields. Several intermediates were
not separated but were used directly in further reactions
thereby simplifying the procedures substantially.
are as follows: For 8: [h]D +46 (c 2.1, CHCl3). H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): l 5.96 (d, 1H, J=4.0 Hz, H-1), 5.59
(dd, 1H, J=1.0, 4.7 Hz, H-3%), 5.49 (d, 1H, J=1.0 Hz,
H-2%), 5.45 (s, 1H, H-1%), 4.81 (dd, 1H, H-5a%), 4.74 (d,
1H, J=4.0 Hz, H-2), 4.64 (dd, 1H, H-5b%), 4.61 (m, 1H,
H-4%), 4.40 (d, 1H, H-3), 4.18 (dd, 1H, H-4), 3.88 (m, 1H,
H-5), 3.75 (dd, 1H, H-6a), 3.68 (dd, 1H, H-6b), 1.54, 1.33
(2 s, 6H, C(CH3)2); Anal. calcd for C35H36O13: C, 63.25;
H, 5.46. Found: C, 63.18; H, 5.51. For 9: [h]D +62 (c 1.5,
CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): l 5.99 (d, 1H,
J=3.4 Hz, H-4%), 5.78 (dd, 1H, J=8.0, 10.4 Hz, H-2%),
5.68 (d, 1H, J=4.1 Hz, H-1), 5.61 (dd, 1H, J=10.4, 3.4
Hz, H-3%), 5.01 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, H-1%), 4.66 (dd, 1H,
H-6a%), 4.50–4.45 (m, 3H, H-6b%, H-3, H-2), 4.37 (m, 1H,
H-5%), 4.19 (dd, 1H, H-4), 3.89 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.70 (d, 2H,
H-6a, 6b), 1.48, 1.24 (2 s, 6H, C(CH3)2); Anal. calcd for
C43H42O15: C, 64.66; H, 5.30. Found: C, 64.75; H, 5.26.
In summary, a special strategy which is peculiarly suit-
able for the preparation of 3,6-branched galacto-
oligosaccharides has been developed.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Sci-
ence Foundation (6021004) and National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China (59973026 and 29905004).
1
For 11: [h]D +28.1 (c 1.6, CHCl3); H NMR (400 MHz,
References
CDCl3): l 5.97 (d, 1H, J=3.2 Hz, H-4), 5.85 (d, 1H,
J=4.1 Hz, H-1), 5.78 (dd, 1H, H-2), 5.61–5.58 (m, 2H, 2
H-3), 5.45 (d, 1H, J=1.0 Hz, H-2), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-1),
4.95 (d, 1H, J=7.9 Hz, H-1), 1.38, 1.28 (2 s, 6H,
(CCH3)2); Anal. calcd for C69H62O22: C, 66.66; H, 5.03.
Found: C, 66.97; H, 5.00. For 12: [h]D +34.9 (c 2.3,
1. (a) Plante, O. J.; Palmacci, E. R.; Seeberger, P. H.
Science 2001, 291, 1523; (b) Sears, P.; Wong, C. H.
Science 2001, 291, 2344.
2. Peng, X.; Tian, G. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 331, 95.
3. Yamada, H. In Bioactive Carbohydrate Polymers, Pro-
ceedings of the Phythochemical Society of Europe;
Paulsen, B. S., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000;
Vol. 44, pp. 16–24.
1
CHCl3); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): l 6.01 (m, 2H, 2
H-4), 5.83 (dd, 1H, H-2), 5.78 (dd, 1H, H-2), 5.66 (dd,
1H, H-3), 5.62 (dd, 1H, H-3), 5.55 (d, 1H, J=4.1 Hz,
H-1), 4.50 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, H-1), 4.96 (d, 1H, J=7.9