A. Sethi et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1028 (2012) 88–96
89
O
O
O
COOH
O
DCC
DMAP
O
C
+
O
O2N
HO
NO2
2
1
Scheme 1.
ring opening process. However, in our newly adopted experimental
protocol, Steglich esterification of diosgenin was carried out using
N,N0-Dicylcohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) as a coupling reagent and 4-
Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as a catalyst (Scheme 1) [19]. The
structure of the desired compound diosgenin p-nitrobenzoate (2)
in which the Spiro ring is intact, is well interpreted with the help
of 1H, 13C, 2D (1HA1H COSY) NMR, IR and UV–Vis spectroscopy.
In order to provide additional proof, and to investigate the stereo-
chemistry and crystal packing of molecule, single crystal X-ray dif-
fraction analysis was also performed. Further in order to get a
better knowledge of the reactivity of the synthesized compound,
theoretical studies by Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional
method (DFT/B3LYP) were also carried out. In addition, HOMO
and LUMO analysis have been carried out to elucidate the informa-
tion regarding charge transfer within the molecule.
150.44(C-50), 139.28(C-5), 136.18(C-20), 130.65(C-30 and C-70),
123.45(C40 and C-60), 122.909(C-6), 109.283(C-22), 80.787(C-3),
5.705(C-26), 66.848(C-16), 62.087(C-17), 56.426(C-9), 49.941(C-
14), 41.617(C-4), 40.266(C-10), 39.709(C-20), 38.069(C-13),
36.925(C-23), 36.772(C-2), 32.065(C-1), 31.843(C-12), 31.408(C-
7), 31.386(C-25), 30.295(C-8), 28.807(C-15), 27.769(C-24),
20.842(C-11),
14.524(C-21).
19.369(C-18),
17.134(C-19),
16.287(C-27),
2.2.1. Crystal structure determination and refinement
Intensity data for the colorless crystals of the compound 2 was
collected at 100(2) K on a Bruker SMART diffractometer system
equipped with graphite monochromated Mo
Ka radiation
k = 0.71073 Å. The final unit cell determination, scaling of the data,
and corrections for Lorentz and polarization effects were per-
formed with Bruker SAINT [20]. A symmetry-related (multi-scan)
absorption correction has been applied. Structure solution, fol-
lowed by full-matrix least squares refinement was performed
using the WINGX-1.70 suite [21] of programs throughout. The
structure was solved by direct methods SHELXS97 [22] and crystal
refinement was done using SHELXL97 [22]. All non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically; hydrogen atoms were located
at calculated positions and refined using a riding model with iso-
tropic thermal parameters fixed at 1.2 times the Ueq value of the
appropriate carrier atom. The conformations of the ring were cal-
culated using PLATON [23]. The perspective view of the molecule
2. Experimental section
2.1. Material and measurements
All reagents used for synthesis were purchased from Sigma Al-
drich (St. Louis, MO) and used without further purification. IR spec-
tra was recorded in KBr disk on
a Nicolet MX-1 FTIR
spectrophotometer, 1H NMR spectra was recorded in CDCl3 solvent
on a Bruker DRX-300 MHz spectrometer, 2D (1HA1H COSY) NMR
spectra was recorded on 600 MHz Varian Inova spectrometer,
whereas 13C NMR was recorded on 150 MHz Varian Inova spec-
trometer using CDCl3 as the solvent where the chemical shifts were
reported in parts per million (ppm) units with respect to TMS as
internal standard. Melting point was determined using open capil-
lary tube method and is uncorrected. The compound was purified
by column chromatography and the purity of the compound was
checked by TLC. Cell culture media and supplements were pur-
chased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Table 1
Crystallographic data and structure refinement for compound 2.
CCDC no.
854729
Crystal description
Empirical formula
Formula weight (g molꢁ1
Temperature (K)
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
Colorless, plate
C
34H45NO6
)
563.71
100(2)
Monoclinic
P2(1)
7.719(2)
2.2. Synthesis of Diosgenin p-nitrobenzoate (DPNB)
A
solution of p-nitrobenzoic acid (0.25 g, 1.5 mmol), DCC
b (Å)
c (Å)
8.425(2)
22.578(6)
90.00
98.46
90.00
1452.3(7)
2
1.289
0.087
608
0.35 ꢂ 0.20 ꢂ 0.15
1.82–28.34
9548
5600 [Rint = 0.0525]
5600/0/370
R1 = 0.0641, wR2 = 0.1327
R1 = 0.0961, wR2 = 0.1667
1.061
(0.20 g, 1.0 mmol), DMAP (0.18 g, 1.5 mmol) and diosgenin
(0.62 g, 1.5 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) was stirred mechanically at
room temperature until reaction was complete (progress of reac-
tion was monitored by TLC). N,N0-dicyclohexylurea formed during
the reaction was filtered off and the filtrate washed successively
with water, 5% HCl and water, and then dried over anhydrous so-
dium sulfate. Toluene was evaporated under reduced pressure
and the crude product obtained was purified by column chroma-
tography using ethyl acetate–hexane (5%) as eluent (Yield 0.58 g,
95%). Slow evaporation of ethyl acetate during recrystallization
yielded colorless needle-shaped crystals of compound 2. m.p:
218 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d (ppm) 8.272 (2H, d, Ar AH,
J = 6 Hz), 8.221 (2H, d, ArAH, J = 6 Hz), 5.447 (1H, m, H-6), 4.933–
4.885 (1H, m, H-3), 4.460–4.389 (1H, m, H-16), 3.499–3.345 (2H,
m, H-26), 2.503 (2H, d, H-4, J = 6 Hz), 1.313 (3H, s, CH3-19), 1.293
(3H, s, CH3-18), 0.96 (3H, d, CH3-21,J = 6 Hz), 0.78 (3H, d, CH3-27,
a
(°)
b (°)
c
(°)
V (Å3)
Z
Dcalc (g cmꢁ3
)
Absorption coefficient (mmꢁ1
F(000)
)
Crystal size (mm3)
h (min–max) (°)
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Data/restraints/parameters
Final R indices [I > 2
r(I)]
R indices (all data)
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Absolute structure parameter
ꢁ0.4(15)
Largest difference peak and hole (e Åꢁ3
Absolute structure parameter
)
0.359 and ꢁ0.368
ꢁ0.05(5)
J = 6 Hz); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3)
d
(ppm) 164.06(C-10),