216 Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2003
Communications
Sch em e 1
triisopropylphenyl)magnesium bromide with GeCl2‚
(dioxane) and SnCl2 at low temperature (Scheme 1).9
The 119Sn-NMR spectrum, showing a typical signal
for such compounds in the low-field region at 268 ppm,
provided the first indication for the existence of a double
bond. An X-ray crystallographic analysis10 of the red
crystals confirmed not only the structure of 4 but also
revealed some interesting features (Figure 1). With a
length of 2.5065 Å the Ge-Sn double bond is about 0.12
Å shorter than the average value for Ge-Sn single
bonds12 and, despite the bulky aryl groups, is even
shorter than the value of 2.555 Å calculated for the
parent compound H2GedSnH2.13 As expected, the trans-
bent angle between the R2Sn plane and the SndGe
vector of 43.3° is larger than the corresponding angle
of 30.2° at the germanium atom.
F igu r e 1. Molecule of 4 in the crystal state (hydrogen
atoms omitted). Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): Ge-Sn )
2.5065(5), Ge-C(31) ) 2.056(4), Ge-C(46) ) 2.051(4), Sn-
C(1) ) 2.150(4), Sn-C(16) ) 2.158(4); C(1)-Sn-C(16) )
104.92(14), C(31)-Ge-C(46) ) 108.13(17), C(1)-Sn-Ge )
111.50(11), C(16)-Sn-Ge ) 120.90(11), C(31)-Ge-Sn )
123.49(12), C(46)-Ge-Sn ) 117.45(10).
Compound 4 is relatively stable in the solid state. It
decomposes slowly in solution with formation of the
cyclotristannane 514 and the digermene 6,15 as detected
by their 1H NMR spectra and, in the case of 5, 119Sn
NMR spectrum. Even after 4 weeks in toluene solution
4 can still be detected together with 5 and 6. Thus, 4
behaves differently from the stannagermene, in which
merely the triisopropylphenyl groups at germanium
have been replaced by mesityl groups. Although the
latter compound can be characterized by trapping
(9) To a suspension of GeCl2‚(dioxane) (0.55 g, 2.37 mmol) and SnCl2
(0.45 g, 2.37 mmol) in THF (35 mL) and dioxane (5 mL) was added at
-78 °C dropwise a solution of the Grignard compound, prepared from
1-bromo-2,4,6-triisopropylbenzene (3.0 g, 10.6 mmol) and magnesium
turnings in THF (30 mL). The mixture was allowed to come to -10
°C. At -40 °C the color changed from light yellow to red. After the
mixture was stirred for 30 min at -10 °C, the solvents were distilled
off, the residue was redissolved in cooled n-pentane (80 mL), and the
precipitated salts were filtered off. Concentration of the solution to a
minimum amount at -20 °C afforded 0.90 g (37% yield) of red crystals
of 4. Because of the low stability of 4 no reliable spectral and analytical
data could be obtained.
F igu r e 2. Molecule of 7 in the crystal state (hydrogen
atoms omitted). Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability.
Selected bond lengths (Å): Ge-Sn ) 2.6347(7), O(1)-O(2)
) 1.521(3).
reactions and its 119Sn NMR signal at 360 ppm, it has
not yet been isolated.16
(10) Crystal data for 4: (C60H92GeSn)2, fw ) 2009.23, monoclinic,
space group P21/n, a ) 14.4059(6) Å, b ) 37.5545(14) Å, c ) 21.6693-
(11) Å, â ) 95.804(6)°, Z ) 4, V ) 11663.1(9) Å3, Dcalcd ) 1.144 g cm-3
,
One of the most interesting reactions of compounds
of type 1 is their oxidation in air, which, in the case of
digermenes, leads to stable 3,4-digermadioxetanes.17 We
thus addressed the question of whether compound 4
would react analogously, despite the greater GedSn
bond length, or whether other reaction pathways would
dominate. Passage of dry air through a solution of 4 in
n-hexane at 0 °C gave the compound 7 in quantitative
yield (Scheme 2). This product was characterized by its
119Sn NMR spectrum (δ 128 ppm) and an X-ray crystal-
lographic analysis (Figure 2).18
µ ) 0.977 mm-1, T ) 193(2) K, crystal size 0.80 × 0.38 × 0.27 mm3,
Stoe-IPDS area detector, structure solution by direct methods, refine-
ment on F2 (2θmax ) 52°), 22 569 unique reflections, R1 ) 0.0500, wR2
(all data) ) 0.1502, GOF (F2) ) 1.031.11
(11) The data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystal-
lographic Data Centre: CCDC-192 690 (4) and CCDC-192 691 (7).
(12) (a) Pannell, K. H.; Parkanyi, L.; Sharma, H.; Cervantes-Lee,
F. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 522. (b) Leue, C.; Reau, R.; Neumann, B.;
Stammler, H.-G.; J utzi, P.; Bertrand, G. Organometallics 1994, 13, 436.
(c) Kawachi, A.; Tanak, Y.; Tamao, K. J . Organomet. Chem. 1999, 590,
15.
(13) (a) Windus, T. L.; Gordon, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
9559. (b) Karni, M.; Apeloig, Y.; Kapp, J .; Schleyer, P. v. R. In The
Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds; Rappoport, Z., Apeloig, Y.,
Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2001; Vol. 3, p 1.
(14) Masamune, S.; Sita, L. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6390
and Supporting Information.
(15) Scha¨fer, H.; Saak, W.; Weidenbruch, M. Organometallics 1999,
18, 3159 and literature cited therein.
(16) Chaubon, M.-A.; Escudie´, J .; Ranaivonjatovo, H.; Satge´, J .
Chem. Commun. 1996, 2621.
(17) Masamune, S.; Batcheller, S. A.; Park, J .; Davies, W. A.;
Yamashita, O.; Ohta, Y.; Kabe, Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1888.