Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
Using the obtained PILs, we optimized reaction condi-
yield and conversion even after 4 h at 1008C (Table 1,
tions for the transformation of D-A cyclopropane 1a as
a model substrate. Under heating in HMimNCS, 1a was found
to produce 5-aryl-2-thioxopyrrolidine-3,3-diester 2a in good
yield. The best result (81%) was achieved when cyclopropane
1a was heated in HMimNCS (3a) at 708C for 1 h (Table 1,
entry 1). Product 2a was obtained with the same yield when
the reaction was performed at 508C for 2 h (Table 1, entry 2).
Oppositely, the increase of the reaction temperature afforded
2a contaminated with inseparable side products (Table 1,
entries 3–5).
The above optimizations were performed at 1 M concen-
tration of 1a in HMimNCS (ca. 8 equiv), which ensured the
homogeneity of reaction mixtures. The attempt to decrease
PIL quantity resulted in a diminished yield of 2a (Table 1,
entry 6). This outcome can be explained by the fact that the
excess of 3a not only facilitates the reaction but also allows
suppression of side-processes as D-A cyclopropanes possess
numerous modes of reactivity, including rearrangements and
dimerizations. Thus, the optimal excess of HMimNCS corre-
sponded to 1 M solution of D-A cyclopropane 1a in PIL.
As for other less acidic PILs, at 708C, the conversion of 1a
was moderate in triethylammonium thiocyanate (3b) and
very low, if at all, in HTmgNCS (3c) (Table 1, entries 7, 8); the
increase of reaction temperature led to decomposition only
(Table 1, entry 9).
entry 10). A tremendous increase in the reaction time allowed
us to achieve almost complete conversion of the starting
material (Table 1, entry 11). However, the yield of 2a was
even lower than that after 4 h. The attempt to improve the
above results by switching from Et3N·HCl to HMimCl was
unsuccessful (Table 1, entry 12). Thus, the conventional
reaction conditions were rendered unsuitable for the title
transformation. Finally, the reaction of 1a with a combination
of NaSCN and PILs containing no nucleophilic anion
(Table 1, entries 13, 14) produced a complex mixture of
non-identified products.
With the optimized conditions in hand (method A), we
investigated the scope of this formal (3+2)-cycloaddition of
=
D-A cyclopropanes to the C N bond of unstable isothio-
cyanic acid. We found that a broad range of cyclopropane-1,1-
dicarboxylates bearing electron-releasing groups at the C(2)
atom of the three-membered ring efficiently participate in the
disclosed reaction (Scheme 3).
Good yields of 2 were obtained in reactions of D-A
cyclopropanes containing mono-, di- and trialkoxyphenyl
groups (1a–h,k). The lower yields of pyrrolidine-2-thiones 2i,j
can be explained by the partial hydrolysis of the acetal moiety
during the reaction followed by side processes involving the
formed phenolic group.[25]
D-A cyclopropanes 1l and 1m afforded the target
products 2l and 2m, respectively, in low yields (16% and
13%). These substrates are too reactive and undergo
a significant decomposition under the reaction conditions.
However, in a less acidic PIL Et3N·HNCS, yields of pyrroli-
dines 2l and 2m[23] were much better (59% and 56%),
especially when substrates were slowly added to preheated
PIL (method B), that allowed minimization of side product
formation. Oppositely, cyclopropane 1n, bearing the 4-
dimethylamino-2-nitrophenyl group, produced pyrrolidine
2n in good yield.
We also tested reaction conditions, similar to those
employed for the ring-opening of D-A cyclopropanes with
sodium azide.[10] However, heating of 1a with sodium
thiocyanate and Et3N·HCl as a proton source in N,N-
dimethylformamide (DMF) produced crude 2a in moderate
Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions for the transformation of 1a
to 2a.[a]
When the electron-releasing effect of methoxy group is
attenuated by the involvement of an additional aromatic ring
between donor group and three-membered ring (1o), the
yield of 2o dropped to 40%. Oppositely, the efficiency of the
transformation of 6-methoxy-2-naphthyl-substituted cyclo-
propane 1p did not principally differ from that of substrates
1c–1h and 1k. A reasonably good yield of the target product
was also obtained in the reaction of phthalimido derivative
1q, but the corresponding aminal 2r bearing a succinimidyl
group was formed in moderate yield (45%). These results are
well consistent with a much higher reactivity of 1q vs. 1r in
the Lewis acid-catalyzed (3 + 2)-cycloaddition with alde-
hydes.[26]
Heteroaryl-substituted cyclopropanes 1s–1u containing
2-furyl, 2- and 3-thienyl groups as donor as well as (1-
benzylindol-4-yl)-derived cyclopropane 1w were found to
participate in the discussed transformation providing the
target heterocycles in reasonable to excellent yields. On the
contrary, (1-methylpyrrol-2-yl)-substituted D-A cyclopro-
pane 1v was found to be too reactive, producing a significant
quantity of admixtures. Similarly to the behavior of 1l and
1m, the replacement of HMimNCS by the less acidic
triethylammonium thiocyanate allowed for increasing yield
Entry “HNCS” source
T [8C] t [h] Yield
of 2a[b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HMimNCS
HMimNCS
HMimNCS
HMimNCS
HMimNCS
HMimNCS (2 M solution of 1a)
Et3N·HNCS
HTmgNCS
70
50
80
100
150
70
70
70
1
2
2
81[c]
81[c]
79[d]
1.5 65[c,d]
[e]
1
1
–
66[e]
13.5 58[f]
[g]
1
4
4
–
[e]
HTmgNCS
NaSCN (2 equiv), Et3N·HCl (2 equiv),
100
100
–
62[h]
58[c]
56[h]
DMF
11
NaSCN (2 equiv), Et3N·HCl (2 equiv),
DMF
100
17
12
13
14
NaSCN (2 equiv), HMimCl (2 equiv), DMF 70
NaSCN (2 equiv), Et3N·3AcOH
NaSCN (2 equiv), Et3N·TFA
6
4
[e]
100
100
–
[e]
5.5
–
[a] 1 M solution of 1a in PIL; 0.5 M solution in DMF. [b] NMR yield in
[%]. [c] Isolated yield. [d] Contaminated by 3–7% of inseparable side
products. [e] Complex mixture. [f] 59% conversion. [g] No conversion.
[h] ca. 70% conversion.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7927 –7934
ꢀ 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH www.angewandte.org 7929