Dimeric Zanamivir Conjugates
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2005, Vol. 48, No. 8 2969
acetonitrile buffered with 0.05% formic acid (solvent A). The
aqueous phase was 0.1% formic acid containing 10 mM
ammonium acetate (solvent B). The gradient was 0% A/0.7
min, 0-100% A/3.5 min, 100% A/1.1 min, 100-0% A/0.2 min.
LC/MS Details. Red Method. This method used a Micro-
mass Platform LC instrument in electrospray positive ioniza-
tion mode. The range was 500-1500 amu. The column was a
3.3 cm × 4.6 mm ID 3 µm ABZ+ with a flow rate of 3.0 mL/
min. The injection volume was 5 µL. The diode array detector
range was 220-300 nm. The mobile phase was 95% acetoni-
trile containing 0.05% formic acid (solvent A) and 0.1% formic
acid containing 10 mM ammonium acetate (solvent B). The
gradient was 0% A/0.7 min, 0-100% A/3.5 min, 100% A/1.1
min, 100-0% A/0.2 min.
LC/MS Details. Black Method. This method used a
Micromass Platform LC TOF mass spectrometer in electro-
spray positive ionization mode. The range was 100-1000 amu.
The column was a 3.3 cm × 4.6 mm ID 3 µm ABZ+ with a
flow rate of 3.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 5 µL. The
mobile phase was 95% acetonitrile containing 0.05% formic
acid (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid (solvent B). The gradient
was 0% A/0.7 min, 0-100% A/3.5 min, 100% A/1.1 min, 100-
0% A/0.2 min.
Preparative HPLC Method for 8. The prep column used
was a Kromasil C18 (20 cm × 5 cm). The UV wavelength was
230 nM with a flow rate of 80 mL/min. Solvent A was 1% TFA
in water and solvent B 80% acetonitrile containing 1% TFA.
The gradient was 0-100%B/70 min. Following HPLC, ap-
propriate fractions were combined and volatile components
removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. The aqueous
was applied to a column of Amberchrom CG-161 resin (10 ×
2.5 cm) which was eluted with water (500 mL), then a 2:2:1
mixture of acetonitrile:MeOH:water (500 mL).
biphenyldiylbis(methanediylimino(oxomethanediyl)oxy{(S)-
[(4R)-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methanediyl})]bis(3-(acetylamino)-
4-{[amino(imino)methyl]amino}-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-6-
carboxylate) trifluoroacetate as a white solid (1.59 g, 94%
yield). 1H NMR (d4 - MeOH) δ 7.39 (d, 4H), 7.17 (d, 4H), 5.71
(s, 2H), 5.45 (s, 2H), 4.98 (m, 2H), 4.60-4.50 (m, 4H), 4.32-
4.12 (m, 6H), 4.09-3.95 (m, 4H), 3.60 (s, 6H), 1.78 (s, 6H). LC/
MS (Green Method) showed (M + 2H+)/2 ) 505; tRET ) 2.27
min.
The above diester dicarbonate (1.59 g, 1.3 mmol) was
dissolved in a mixture of water (28.5 mL) and methanol (28.5
mL). To this was added triethylamine (2.85 mL) and the
solution stirred for 4 h. Volatile organic components were
removed in vacuo, and the residual solution was adjusted to
pH 2 by addition of TFA. Reverse phase preparative HPLC
gave the title compound 8 (0.70 g; 57% yield). 1H NMR (D2O)
(rotamers) δ 7.65-7.49 (m, 4H), 7.27 (m, 4H), 5.05 (bs, 1.4H),
5.45 (bs, 0.6H), 4.87-4.75 (m, 2H), 4.45-3.92 (m, 12H), 3.60-
3.27 (m, 3.4H), 3.02 (m, 0.6H), 1.82 (m, 6H). LC/MS (Green
Method) showed (M + 2H+)/2 ) 465; tRET ) 2.00 min.
Microanalysis: Calc. for C40H52N10O16‚6H2O C 46.3%, H 6.2%;
N 13.5%. Found: C 46.3%; H 5.9%; N 13.2%
Crystals of 8 were grown by dissolving 8 (20 mg) in water
(0.23 mL) in an A vial. This vial was then placed in a D vial
containing ethanol (1 mL) and the vial sealed with a screw
cap. After 4 months, crystals of 8 were present in the A vial.
Dimethyl (2R,3R,4S,2′R,3′R,4′S)-2,2′-[Benzene-1,4-diyl-
bis((oxomethanediyl)imino-3,1-propanediylimino-
(oxomethanediyl)oxy{(S)-[(4R)-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]-
methanediyl})]bis(3-(acetylamino)-4-{[bis({[(1,1-
dimethylethyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)methylidene]amino}-
3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-6-carboxylate) 12. Prepared similarly
to 7 using N,N′-bis-(3-aminopropyl)-1,4-benzenedicarboxamide
11.17 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.35 (s, 2H), 8.49 (d, 2H), 8.12 (m,
2H), 8.00 (m, 2H), 7.95 (s, 4H), 6.90 (m, 2H), 6.76 (d, 2H), 5.91
(s, 2H), 5.52 (m, 2H), 5.05 (m, 6H), 4.72 (t, 2H), 4.65 (t, 2H),
4.25 (m, 4H), 3.79 (s, 6H), 3.67 (m, 2H), 3.45 (m, 4H), 3.13 (m,
Immobilized Artifical Chromatography. This chroma-
tography was carried out using a Regis DD.PC IAM column
(PC ) phosphatidyl choline) with 5 µM 300 Å packing and 3
cm by 4.6 mm ID at 37 °C. The mobile phase was Dulbecco’s
PBS with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Compounds were dissolved
in the eluent at ∼0.5 mg/mL (10 µL injected).
2H), 1.80 (s, 6H), 1.45 (s, 36H). LC-MS (Red Method): tRET
)
3.76 min; MH+ ) 1474.
(2R,3R,4S,2′R,3′R,4′S)-2,2′-(Benzene-1,4-diylbis{(oxo-
methanediyl)imino-3,1-propanediylimino(oxometh-
anediyl)oxy[(1R,2R)-2,3-dihydroxy-1,1-propanediyl]})-
bis(3-(acetylamino)-4-{[amino(imino)methyl]amino}-3,4-
dihydro-2H-pyran-6-carboxylic acid) 13. The tert-butyl
carbamate groups of 12 were removed similarly to 8 to afford
dimethyl (2R,3R,4S,2′R,3′R,4′S)-2,2′-[benzene-1,4-diylbis((ox-
omethanediyl)imino-3,1-propanediylimino(oxomethanediyl)-
oxy{(S)-[(4R)-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methanediyl})]bis(3-(acety-
lamino)-4-{[amino(imino)methyl]amino}-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-
6-carboxylate). 1H NMR (MeOH-d4) δ 7.88 (s, 4H), 5.89 (s, 2H),
5.56 (s, 2H), 5.15 (m, 2H), 4.70 (m, 4H), 4.43 (m, 4H), 4.14 (m,
2H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 3.43 (m, 4H), 3.16 (m, 4H), 1.92 (s, 6H), 1.80
(m, 2H). LC-MS: (Red Method) tRET ) 2.13 min; MH+ ) 1075.
The bis-trifluoroacetic acid salt was first converted into the
bis-hydrochloride. The bis-trifluoroacetic acid salt (10 g) was
dissolved in MeOH/water (1:1v/v) (150 mL) and applied to a
prewashed Amberlite IRA-410 (chloride form) ion exchange
column (4 × 50 cm). The dihydrochloride was eluted from this
column with MeOH/water (1:1v/v). Fractions containing prod-
uct were concentrated in vacuo to give a white foam. The bis-
hydrochloride (10.4 g) was dissolved in methanol (144 mL) and
water (144 mL) and cooled in ice. Triethylamine (7.75 mL) was
added in three portions over 10 min. The reaction was
monitored by reverse phase HPLC. When the reaction was
complete the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness in
vacuo.
Dimethyl (2R,3R,4S,2′R,3′R,4′S)-2,2′-[4,4′-Biphenyl-
diylbis(methanediylimino(oxomethanediyl)oxy{(S)--[(4R)-
2-oxo-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methanediyl})]bis(3-(acetylamino)-
4-{[bis({[(1,1-dimethylethyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)methyli-
dene]amino}-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-6-carboxylate) 7. The
alcohol 418 (2.74 g, 4.79 mmol) was dried by azeotroping four
times from anhydrous toluene and then dissolved in anhydrous
pyridine (13.75 mL). To this were added DMAP (1.46 g, 11.98
mmol) and p-nitrophenyl chloroformate (1.06 g, 5.27 mmol),
and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. To
the mixture was then added more pyridine (8.25 mL), followed
by [1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-dimethanamine16 6 (0.51 g, 2.4 mmol),
and stirring was continued for a further 16 h. The mixture
was concentrated in vacuo and applied as a solution in DCM
to a 90 g, silica Biotage cartridge. This was eluted with diethyl
ether, followed by Et2O:EtOAc (1:1), then Et2O:EtOAc (1:2) and
finally EtOAc to afford the title compound as a white solid
(1.92 g, 57% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 11.34 (s, 2H), 8.63 (m,
2H), 7.46 (d, 4H), 7.30 (d, 4H), 5.83 (s, 2H), 5.50 (s, 2H), 5.38
(bs, 2H), 5.15 (bs, 2H), 4.95 (m, 2H), 4.66-4.53 (m, 4H), 4.46-
4.54 (m, 4H), 4.30-4.15 (m, 6H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 1.84 (s, 6H), 1.45
(s, 36H). LC/MS (Green Method) showed (M + 2H+)/2 ) 705;
tRET ) 3.96 min.
(2R,3R,4S)-3-(Acetylamino)-2-{(1R,2R)-1-[({[(4′-{[({[(1R,-
2R)-1-((2R,3R,4S)-3-(acetylamino)-4-{[amino(imino)me-
thyl]amino}-6-carboxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)-2,3-
dihydroxypropyl]oxy}carbonyl)amino]methyl}-1,1′-
biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]amino}carbonyl)oxy]-2,3-
dihydroxypropyl}-4-{[amino(imino)methyl]amino}-3,4-
dihydro-2H-pyran-6-carboxylic Acid 8. The above dimer
7 (1.92 g, 1.36 mmol) was dissolved in a 10:1 mixture of DCM:
anisole (27.5 mL) and treated with TFA (25 mL). The resulting
solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h then
concentrated in vacuo. Trituration of the residue with diethyl
ether afforded dimethyl (2R,3R,4S,2′R,3′R,4′S)-2,2′-[4,4′-
Purification. The impure product (10.5 g) was dissolved
in water (80 mL) and orthophosphoric acid (5 mL) was added
to ensure the sample solution was pH 2. This solution (ca. 100
mL) was subjected to preparative HPLC using a 7 µm Kromasil
C8 column (25 cm × 5 cm id.). Chromatographic resolution of
the product was achieved using ion-pair gradient elution where
the start mobile phase A was H2O to which had been added 8
g/L of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and 2 mL/L H3PO4. The final