Unfortunately, Tsunoda modification10 of the Mitsunobu
reaction revealed no improvement of the product yield. Thus,
the two-step reaction from 1 gave 3a(â) in only 23% yield
accompanied with troublesome separation of the diastereo-
isomers.
Scheme 1
We thought that the useless diol 2a(R) could be trans-
formed to the desired 3a(â) via an intramolecular Nicholas
reaction.11 Complexation of the alkynyl group of 2a(R) with
dicobalt octacarbonyl (Co2(CO)8) would afford 5a(R). In this
complex, the Co2(CO)6-alkyne functionality stabilizes the
adjacent sp2-hybridized carbocation formed by treatment with
acid, bringing about the loss of configuration at C1. The
following nucleophilic attack of the C4-OH on the stablized
carbocation may at least partly afford 6a(â). Treatment of
2a(R) with 1.2 equiv of Co2(CO)8 in CH2Cl2 gave rise to
the corresponding 5a(R) in a quantitative yield. Cyclization
of 5a(R) to 6a smoothly proceeded in the presence of 0.1
equiv of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) at 25 °C in
CH2Cl2 (Scheme 2). Surprisingly, only one cyclized product
Scheme 2
2-deoxy-D-ribofuranose (1)5 with (trimethylsilyl)ethynyllith-
ium (Scheme 1). The diol 2a was a mixture of two epimers
(32 and 58%), and the ratio of the epimers was scarcely
influenced by changing the reaction conditions. After treat-
ment with standard Mitsunobu reagents (Ph3P, DEAD),6 2a-
(S) gave one cyclized product 3a(â) and the other epimer
2a(R) gave two cyclized products 3a(r) and 4a(â).7 The
stereochemistry of the resulting furanosides was determined
by NOE experiments8 and derivatization of 3a(â) to the
known compound reported by Woerpel et al.,5,8 while the
C1 configurations of the starting diols 2a were assigned on
the basis of the stereochemistry of 3a and 4a, considering
Mitsunobu inversion. The diol 2a(S) was converted to the
desired â-anomer 3a(â) in 65% yield; on the other hand,
R-anomer 3a(r) and C4-inverted diastereomer 4a(â)9 were
obtained from 2a(R) in 38 and 12% yields, respectively.
6a(â) was obtained, which was determined to be the desired
anomer after decomplexation with iodine to 3a(â) in 93%
overall yield. The reaction was also successful when the
diastereomeric mixture of 2a was used, and the reaction
sequence of the complexation, cyclization, and decomplex-
ation could be conducted in one pot. Indeed, a mixture of
2a(S) and 2a(R) was treated with Co2(CO)8, TfOH, Et3N
(for neutralization of TfOH), and iodine to yield 3a(â) in
90% yield. In the conventional cyclization method utilizing
TsCl and pyridine,4a 2a(S) gave 3a(â) and 4a(r) in 51 and
8% yields, respectively, and 2a(R) gave 3a(r) and 4a(â) in
59 and 7% yields, respectively.
This reaction sequence is applicable to a wide variety of
alkynes. Thus, (trimethylsilyl)ethynyl, ethynyl, alkylethynyl,
arylethynyl, heteroarylethynyl, and (allyloxymethyl)ethynyl-
lithium or magnesium reagents could be used for the
alkynylation. The complexation and following reactions
afforded the corresponding alkynyl C-2-deoxy-D-ribofura-
nosides in high yields with high â-selectivities (Table 1).
Next, we tried to elucidate this high â-selectivity. The
isolated 6a(r) was subjected to the reaction conditions for
(4) On the other hand, various methods have been reported for the
synthesis of alkynyl C-â-D-ribofuranosides: (a) Buchanan, J. G.; Edgar,
A. R.; Power, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 1943-1949.
Buchanan, J. G.; Dunn, A. D.; Edgar, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1975, 1191-1200. (b) Arakawa, K.; Miyasaka, T.; Hamamichi, N. Chem.
Lett. 1976, 1119-1122. Hamamichi, N.; Miyasaka, T.; Arakawa, K. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1978, 26, 898-907. (c) De Las Heras, F. G.; Tam, S. Y.-K.;
Klein, R. S.; Fox, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 84-90. Tam, S. Y.-K.;
Klein, R. S.; De Las Heras, F. G.; Fox, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4854-
4862. (d) Alonso, G.; Garcia-Lopez, M. T.; Garcia-Mun˜oz, G.; Madron˜ero,
R. An. Quim. 1976, 72, 987-990. (e) Gupta, C. M.; Jones, G. H.; Moffatt,
J. G. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3000-3009. (f) Zhai, D.; Zhai, W.; Williams,
R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2501-2505. (g) Rycroft, A. D.; Singh,
G.; Wightman, R. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 2667-2668.
(h) Maqbool, Z.; Hasan, M.; Pott, K. T.; Malik, A.; Nizami, T. A.; Voelter,
W. Z. Naturforsch 1997, 52b, 1383-1392.
(5) Larsen, C. H.; Ridgway, B. H.; Shaw, J. T.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12208-12209. See Supporting Information of this
paper.
(6) Reviews for Mitsunobu reaction: Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981,
1-28. Hughes, D. L. In Organic Reaction; Paquette, L. A., Ed.; John
Wiley: New York, 1992; Vol. 42, pp 335-656.
(7) Weizman, H.; Tor, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3375-3376.
(8) See Supporting Information.
(10) Tsunoda, T.; Otsuka, J.; Yamamiya, Y.; Itoˆ, S. Chem. Lett. 1994,
539-542. Itoˆ, S.; Tsunoda, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 2071-2074.
(11) Reviews for Nicholas reaction: (a) Nicholas, K. M. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1987, 20, 207-214. (b) Smith, W. A.; Caple, R.; Smoliakova, I. P.
Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2359-2382.
(9) This type of C4 inversion was also seen in the preparation of C-aryl
ribofuranosides: Yokoyama, M.; Toyoshima, A.; Akiba, T.; Togo, H. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 265-268.
626
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 5, 2003