medium yields (entries 12, 13).† Due to the need to form an
unfavorable 8-membered ring, the next higher homologue
1,4-butanediol, however, showed no reaction.
Reuter (Bayer AG, Krefeld). The work was financially
supported by the Fond der Chemischen Industrie.
Notes and references
†
General procedure for the Mitsunobu reaction of thiophene 1 and 1,n-
alkanediols 2, 4: Under argon and exclusion of light, to a solution of
3,4-dihydroxy-2,5-thiophenedicarboxylic acid diethyl ester 1 (1.72 g, 6.6
mmol), diol 2, 4 (6.6 mmol) and tributylphosphine (TBP) (4.3 mL, 16.5
mmol) in THF (abs., 12 mL) at 20 °C, was slowly added diisopropylazodi-
carboxylate (DIAD) (3.4 mL, 16.5 mmol) via cannula and without dilution
over 20 minutes. After the addition, the reaction mixture was warmed to 40
°C for 48 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The
resulting yellowUred oil was diluted in hexane (15 mL) and stirred
vigorously to produce a precipitation of the product and hydrazine
dicarboxylic acid. Final purification by flash chromatography (SiO2Udi-
chloromethane) yielded the pure compounds 3,5 as white solids.
In recent years, the scope of the Mitsunobu reaction in natural
products syntheses has been extensively discussed and re-
viewed. Since a clean SN2 process is generally observed, this
reaction is found to be particularly effective at inverting the
configuration of chiral secondary alcohols.7 If no racemisation
occurs, the use of chiral glycols in the reaction with thiophene
1 could lead to chiral EDOT derivatives. In this respect, we
reacted 1 with (R)-(+)-1,2-propanediol (R)2b and (S)-
(2)-1,2-propanediol (S)2b, respectively, under Mitsunobu
conditions (entries 3, 4). The resulting chiral 5-methyl-EDOTs
(S)3b and (R)3b were obtained in good yields comparable to
that of racemic 5-methyl-EDOT 3b (entry 2). The enantiomeric
purity of the chiral compounds (S)3b and (R)3b was determined
Representative data: Disubstituted EDOT 3g: mp 132U133 °C; 1H NMR
3
(400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): d = 4.45 (m, 2H), 4.33 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H),
1.37 (dd, 3J = 6.7 Hz, 4J = 2.4 Hz, 6 H), 1.36 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H); 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): d = 160.78, 144.68, 111.17, 73.24, 61.03,
14.26, 14.18; Anal. calc. for C14H18O6S: C 53.49, H 5.77, S 10.20; found:
C 53.20, H 5.74, S 10.08%.
Representative data: Chiral EDOT (R)-(+)-3b: mp 126U128 °C; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): d = 4.46U4.30 (m, 6H), 3.99 (dd, 3J = 11.6 Hz,
4J = 7.9 Hz 1H), 1.46 (d, 3H), 1.36 (t, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3,
25 °C): d = 160.84, 145.46, 144.77, 111.52, 111.46, 70.58, 69.32, 61.24,
1
to be > 97% by H-NMR in the presence of chiral europium
20
61.18, 16.17, 14.28, 14.26; [a]D +51 (c1.0, CHCl3); Anal. calc. for
complex [Eu(tfc)3].8
C13H16O6S: C 51.99, H 5.37, S 10.68; found: C 51.96, H 5.28, S
10.71%.
Representative data: Chiral EDOT (R)-(+)-7b: bp 90U100 °C/1 3 1022
mbar; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 6.30 (AB system, JAB = 3.74 Hz,
2H), 4.29U3.79 (m, 3H), 1.33 (d, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C):
20
d = 142.22, 141.48, 99.32, 70.03, 69.47, 16.25; [a]D + 34.3 (c1.0,
CHCl3); Anal. calc. for C7H8O2S: C 53.83, H 5.16, S 20.53; found: C 53.65,
H 5.37, S 20.66%.
These results clearly confirm that the Mitsunobu reaction of
thiophene 1 with chiral diols takes place without any racemisa-
tion resulting in enantiomers of high optical purity. The absolute
configuration at C-5 of EDOTs (S)3b and (R)3b can not be
established by this method.
Polymerizable EDOT monomers are typically obtained by
saponification9 and decarboxylation10 of the diesters. As an
example, chiral derivative (R)3b was transformed to the
corresponding diacid (R)6b and subsequently to the 5-methyl-
EDOT (R)7b in yields of 92 and 64%, respectively. Since the
reactions do not break any of the four bonds to the chiral center
of the starting diester (R)3b, it is obvious that the relative
positions of the groups bonded to the chiral center will not
change.
1 L. Groenendaal, F. Jonas, D. Freitag, H. Pielartzik and J. R. Reynolds,
Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 481–494.
2 (a) F. Jonas and R. Dhein, Bayer AG, German Patent DE 4229 192,
1994; (b) K. Lerch, U. Guntermann and F. Jonas, Bayer AG, Eur. Patent
825 219, 1998; (c) D. M. de Leeuw, P. A. Kraakman, P. F. G. Bongaerts,
C. M. J. Mutsaers and D. B. M. Klaassen, Synth. Met., 1994, 66,
263–273.
3 F. Dallacker and V. Mues, Chem. Ber., 1975, 108, 569–575; F.
Dallacker and V. Mues, Chem. Ber., 1975, 108, 576–581.
4 (a) G. A. Sotzing, J. R. Reynolds and P. J. Steel, Chem. Mater., 1996,
8, 882–889; (b) S. A. Sapp, G. A. Sotzing and J. R. Reynolds, Chem.
Mater., 1998, 10, 2101–2108; (c) B. C. Thompson, P. Schottland, K.
Zong and J. R. Reynolds, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 1563–1571.
5 D. M. Welsh, A. Kumar, E. W. Meijer and J. R. Reynolds, Adv. Mater.,
1999, 11, 1379–1382.
6 D. L. Hughes, Org. React., 1992, 42, 335–656.
7 (a) O. Mitsunobu, Synthesis, 1981, 1–28; (b) B. R. Castro, Org. React.,
1983, 29, 1–162.
8 The enantiomeric purity of the EDOT derivatives 3b was determined by
using Eu(tfc)3 as a chiral shift reagent. A reasonable separation of the
signals (triplet) of the ester methyl groups (d = 1.36 ppm) is observed
when 10 mg of the shift reagent was added to a CDCl3 solution of the
EDOT giving a final concentration of 0.13 mM. The signals are shifted
downfield and separated into four triplets. The signals at 1.425 and
1.355 ppm correspond to (R)-(+)-3b, the signals at 1.415 and 1.365 ppm
to the (S)-(2)-enantiomer.
In summary, we have demonstrated that the Mitsunobu
reaction is a useful and efficient method for the synthesis of
mono- and disubstituted EDOT and ProDOT derivatives.
Moreover, this method allows, for the first time, the preparation
of chiral EDOT monomers in high enantiomeric excess. Studies
to further examine the scope and limitations of this novel
method are now in progress as well as the polymerization of the
various monomers to the corresponding substituted PEDOTs. In
particular, polymerization of enantiomerically pure EDOT 7b
should lead to the corresponding chiral polymer.
9 V. N. Gogte, L. G. Shah, B. D. Tilak, K. N. Gadekar and M. B.
Sahasrabudhe, Tetrahedron, 1967, 23, 2437–2441.
10 (a) I. Winter, C. Reese, J. Hormes and G. Heywang, Chem. Phys., 1995,
194, 207–213 (with copper) (b) F. Jonas and G. Rauchschwalbe, Bayer
AG, Eur. Patent 1142888, 2001 (with CuCO3/Cu(OH)2).
11 W. P. Weber and J. P. Shepherd, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972,
4907–4908.
12 T. Morimoto and M. Hirano, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1982,
1087–1090.
We gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Dr S.
Kirchmeyer (H.C.Starck/Bayer AG, Leverkusen) and Dr K.
13 P. Schottland, O. Stephan, P.-Y. Le Gall and C. Chevrot, J. Chim. Phys.
Phys.-Chim. Biol., 1998, 95, 1258–1261.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2690–2691
2691