372
E. M. SHERIF AND A. H. AHMED
NaCl solutions using electrochemical and gravimetric tech- 12. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007,
309, 470.
niques along with pH measurements. Electrochemical measure-
ments revealed that both O-MBH and O-MTH decrease the
cathodic, anodic and corrosion currents, and shift the potential
slightly to the less negative values. Moreover, the presence of
13. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007,
311, 144.
14. Srivastafa, R.D., Mukerjee, R.C., and Agarwal, A.K. Corros. Sci., 1979,
19, 27.
these compounds decreased the absolute dissolution current of 15. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. J. Appl. Electrochem., 2009,
39, 83.
copper and this effect increased with increasing their concen-
16. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. Corros. Sci., 2008, 50,
trations. Weight loss–time data were in good agreement with
those obtained by electrochemical measurements. In addition,
the variation of pH values exhibited a linear relationship with the
3439.
17. Zhang, D.-Q., Gao, L.-X., and Zhou, G.-D. J. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2004, 225,
287.
copper dissolution rate in chloride solutions, while the presence 18. Christy, A.G., Lowe, A., Otieno-Alego, V., Stoll, M., and Webster, R.D. J.
Appl. Electrochem., 2004, 34, 225.
19. Zucchi, F., Trabanelli, G., and Fonsati, M. Corros. Sci., 1996, 38,
of the organic compounds decreased considerably the increase
of pH by limiting the dissolution of copper. Results together
are internally consistent with each other showing clearly that
O-MBH and O-MTH produced significant inhibition efficiency
2019.
20. Mansikkama¨ki, K., Johans, C., and Kontturi, K. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2006,
153, B22.
against copper corrosion in 3.5% NaCl solutions considering 21. Sherif, E.M., El Shamy, A.M., Ramla, M.M., and El Nazhawy, A.O.H.
Mater. Chem. Phys., 2007, 102, 231.
O-MTH is more effective corrosion inhibitor than O-MBH.
22. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152, B205.
23. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 1313.
24. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. Electrochim. Acta, 2010,
REFERENCES
55, 3657.
1. Dutta, R.L., and Hossain, M.M. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 1985, 44, 636.
2. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152, B428.
3. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. J. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 4665.
4. Sherif, E.M., J. Appl. Sur. Sci., 2006, 252, 8615.
25. Dutta, R.L., and Sarkar, A.K. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1981, 43, 57.
26. Gatterman, L., and Wieland, H. Laboratory Methods of Organic Chemistry.
1963, McMillan, London, P. 153.
27. Rastogi, D.K., Dua, S.K., Rana, V.B., and Sahni, S.K. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.,
1978, 40, 1323.
28. Chanbanur, H.S., Revankar, V.K., and Mahale, V.B., Synth. React. Inorg.
Met. – Org. Chem., 2001, 31, 339.
29. Yan, C.W., Lin, H.C., and Cao, C.N. Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45,
2815.
5. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, 4065.
6. Sherif, E.M., and Park, S.-M. J. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 6556.
7. El Warraky, A., El Shayeb, H.A., and Sherif, E.M. Anti-Corros. Meth.
Mater., 2004, 51, 52.
8. Bacarella, L., and Griess, J.C. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1973, 120, 459.
9. Hoepner, T., and Lattemann, S. Desalination, 2003,152, 133.
10. Souissi, N., and Triki, E. J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42, 3259.
30. Roberge, P.R. Handbook of Corrosion Engineering, 2000, McGraw-Hill,
New York.
11. Sherif, E.M., Erasmus, R.M., and Comins, J.D. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 31. Sathiyanarayanan, S., Sahre, M., and Kautek, W. Corros. Sci., 1999, 41,
306, 96. 1899.