entry 1). Even more surprisingly, the selectivity reversed
(syn/anti ) 1:2.5, entry 2) in reaction with benzaldehyde. A
similar trend was observed when the tert-butyl ketone 1b
was used (entries 3 and 4). The reactions involving BF3‚
OEt2 were carried out at -30 °C since the enolate formation
from the cyclopropane derivative was very slow at -78 °C.
The yields were generally low, and good amounts (35-45%)
of the corresponding γ,δ-unsaturated ketones 5a/5b were
obtained.
and (E)-enolates was estimated to be 2.1:1. The signal
assignments for the Ti-enolates were used to determine the
Z/E ratios of the other metal enolates. The Z/E ratios of the
different metal enolates after 0.5 and 4 h of mixing are given
in Table 3. These experiments reveal an equilibration of the
1
Table 3. Results of H NMR Study of Different Metal
Enolates of 1a at 25 °C
To understand the above discrepancies, we carried out
SnCl4- and Et2AlCl-assisted reactions of 1a with benzalde-
hyde (entries 5 and 6, Table 2) where reversal in selectivity
was observed with BF3‚OEt2. Poor syn selectivity was noted
with SnCl4 (2:1), which improved to 5.2:1 when the reaction
was warmed to 25 °C with a decrease in the yield.
Examination of aliquots drawn at -30 and 25 °C and at 3
and 5 h from reaching 25 °C by 1H NMR revealed
enhancement in syn selectivity. Further, a similar examina-
tion of the aliquots drawn at -30 and 25 °C of the TiCl4-
assisted reaction showed hardly any change in selectivity.
The yield, however, was somewhat reduced. These experi-
ments suggest a possible retro-aldol in the SnCl4-assisted
reaction upon being warmed to 25 °C. Even though the
selectivity observed with Et2AlCl was only marginally syn
(1.2:1), the yield of the reaction was excellent.12
Further, to understand the origin of the syn/anti diaste-
reoselectivity,13 the titanium enolate derived from 1a was
treated separately with Me3SiCl and (EtO)2P(O)Cl, 1.5 equiv
each, at -78 °C to discern the geometry of the enolate. Both
the attempts, however, were unsuccessful, as only 1-phe-
nylpent-4-en-1-one was obtained. Hence, 1H NMR study of
the different metal enolates derived from 1a was carried out
at 25 °C in CD2Cl2. The geometries of the Ti-enolates were
discerned from NOE experiments, and the ratio of the (Z)-
Lewis acid time (h) enolate ratio (Z:E) product ratio (syn:anti)
TiCl4
0.5
4.0
0.5
4.0
0.5
4.0
0.5
4.0
2.1:1
1.9:1
1:4.3
1:1.7
1:1
1:1.3
1:1.5
1:1.5
2.6:1
1.2:1
>1:10
1.5:1
BF3‚OEt2
Et2AlCl
SnCl4
enolates at 25 °C except for the tin-enolate. The boron enolate
existed predominantly in the (E)-form. After 4 h, the metal
enolates were treated with benzaldehyde for 1 h in the NMR
tube itself and the syn:anti ratios of the aldol products were
estimated from 1H NMR. The following observations could
be made from the above experiments: (a) the syn:anti ratios
are less at 25 °C compared to those at the lower temperatures
with TiCl4 and SnCl4, (b) the preferred anti selectivity (syn:
anti ) 1:2.5) observed at -30 °C is changed in favor of the
syn selectivity (syn:anti ) 1.2:1) at 25 °C with BF3‚OEt2,
and (c) with Et2AlCl, interestingly, the selectivity changed
from slightly syn (syn:anti ) 1.2:1) to largely anti (syn:anti
> 1:10) at 25 °C.
A closed chair transition state appears to be the most
probable transition structure to explain the syn selectivity
of the Ti-enolates (Scheme 1). Both BF3‚OEt2 and SnCl4
(8) Syn and anti relationships in the aldol products were assigned on
the basis of 1H chemical shifts of the hydrogen on the carbinol carbon. The
hydrogen resonated 0.06-0.12 ppm downfield in the syn isomer compared
to the hydrogen in the corresponding anti isomer. Furthermore, this hydrogen
appeared as a triplet (J ) 1.7-6.3 Hz) and a doublet (J ) 4.6-5.8 Hz) or
a broad singlet, respectively, in the anti and syn aldol products obtained
from arylaldehydes. For references related to the syn and anti assignments,
see: (a) Ohtsuka, Y.; Koyasu, K.; Ikeno, T.; Yamada, T. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 2543. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Wong, K.-T.; Stavenger, R. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 2333. (c) Hasegawa, E.; Ishiyama, K.; Kato, T.; Horaguchi,
T.; Shimizu, T.; Tanaka, S.; Yamashita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5352.
(d) Noyori, R.; Nishida, I.; Sakata, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2106.
(e) House, H. O.; Crumrine, D. S.; Teranishi, A. Y.; Olmstead, H. D. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3310.
Scheme 1
(9) Mukaiyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 7603.
(10) Heathcock, C. H.; Buse, C. T.; Kleschick, W. A.; Pirrung, M. C.;
Sohn, J. E.; Lampe, J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1066.
(11) (a) Yamago, S.; Machii, D.; Nakamura, E. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
2098. (b) Kuwajima, I.; Nakamura, E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 181. (c)
Mukaiyama, T.; Iwasawa, N.; Stevens, R. W.; Haga, T. Tetrahedron 1984,
40, 1281. (d) Mukaiyama, T.; Stevens, R. W.; Iwasawa, N. Chem. Lett.
1982, 353. (e) Yamamoto, Y.; Maruyama, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21,
4607.
(12) Only marginal syn selectivity has been reported with similar
aluminium enolates; see: Maruoka, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Kitagawa, Y.;
Yamamoto, H.; Nozaki, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7705.
(13) For transition state models, see: (a) Zimmerman, H. E.; Traxler,
M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1920. (b) Dubois, J. E.; Fellmann, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 1225. (c) Fellmann, P.; Dubois, J. E. Tetrahedron
1978, 34, 1349. (d) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Topics in
Stereochemistry; Eliel, E. L., Wiley, S. H., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1982; Vol. 13, p 1. (e) Also see ref 10.
show syn selectivity, although their enolates are more of the
(E)-configuration. This could be because of the difference
in the reactivities of the (Z)- and (E)-enolates; the (Z)-enolate
reacts faster than the (E)-enolate. The preferred anti selectivi-
ties of the boron enolates of 1a and 1b with benzaldehyde
at -30 °C may be because of a combination of the higher
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003
4283