C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Photophysical Parameters of Coumarin Analogues
ꢀ (M-1 cm-1 a
)
λ
abs (nm)a
λ
ex (nm)b
λ
em (nm)b
quantum yield
1
5
33,000 ( 2000
47,000 ( 2000
421
430
432
443
507
495
0.011 ( 0.001
0.65 ( 0.04
Figure 3. Specific labeling of azido-mDHFR with phosphine 1. Purified
azido-mDHFR (lanes 1 and 3) and native mDHRF (lanes 2 and 4) were
incubated overnight with 200 µM 1 in 40% EtOH/PBS, pH 7.1, and the
crude reaction was analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. Lanes 1 and 2 show the
silver-stained gel, indicating total protein content. Lanes 3 and 4 show the
same gel analyzed by fluorescence imaging (excitation at 457 nm, emission
collected with a 520 nm band-pass filter).
a Measured in ethanol. b Measured in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
and 4 was immediately evident and did not occur in control
reactions lacking 4 (Figure 2B).
The photophysical parameters of phosphine 1 and phosphine
oxide 5 are quite distinct and are summarized in Table 1. The
maximum absorbance of the ligated product 5 was slightly red-
shifted compared to phosphine 1. In addition, the molar absorptivity
of 5 was greater. The excitation spectra measured in phosphate-
buffered saline were observed to have maxima at 432 and 443 nm
for compounds 1 and 5, respectively. The most profound difference
between the two compounds was observed in their quantum yields
of fluorescence. Compound 5 showed intense emission with a
maximum at 495 nm and a quantum yield relative to quinine sulfate
of 0.65 ( 0.04. In contrast, phosphine 1 exhibited a very weak
fluorescence with a quantum yield of 0.011 ( 0.001 and an emission
maximum at 507 nm. Thus, reaction of phosphine 1 with azides
produces a product easily distinguishable from the reactants by its
intense fluorescence.
To demonstrate the utility of compound 1 for biomolecule
labeling, we reacted the phosphine dye with recombinant murine
dihydrofolate reductase bearing azidohomoalanine residues in place
of native methionine residues.10 This azido protein (azido-mDHFR)
was generated by metabolic incorporation of azidohomoalanine
during overexpression in a methionine auxotrophoic E. coli strain,
as previously reported.10 Azido-mDHFR and native mDHFR were
incubated with 200 µM phosphine 1, and the crude reactions were
loaded directly onto a gel with no separation of unreacted dye.
Analysis of the gel by silver stain (lanes 1 and 2) and fluorescence
imaging (lanes 3 and 4) showed specific labeling of the azido
protein by compound 1 and no detectable labeling of the native
protein lacking azides (Figure 3). Unlike previous experiments using
FLAG and biotin conjugates, the labeled protein could be directly
observed without need for Western blotting, washing, or secondary
labeling steps.
Figure 4. Kinetics of the reaction between compounds 1 and 4 under
pseudo-first-order conditions: (b) 5 mM 4, 0.011 mM 1; (9) 5 mM 4,
0.0022 mM 1; (×) 0.011 mM 1; (O) 0.0022 mM 1. Fluorescence intensities
were determined at λex ) 443 nm and λem ) 493 nm.
Acknowledgment. The Center for New Directions in Organic
Synthesis is supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb as Sponsoring
Member and Novartis as Supporting Member. We thank Eliana
Saxon, Sarah Luchansky, David Madden, and Roger Tsien for
technical advice, and David Tirrell and Kristi Kiick for azido-
mDHFR. G.A.L. was supported by NIH Biotechnology Training
Grant GM08352. This work was supported by NIH Grant GM58867.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures and
analytical data for compound 1 and its precursors, experimental details
for fluorescence quantum yield and kinetic measurements, excitation
and emission spectra for compounds 1 and 5, and procedures for protein
labeling (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
We determined the rate of reaction between phosphine 1 and
azide 4, exploiting fluorescence as a measure of product formation,
to optimize conditions for biomolecule labeling (Figure 4). In the
absence of azide 4 there was no significant change in the
fluorescence intensity with time, an indication that background
oxidation (presumably with dissolved molecular oxygen) occurs
at a relatively low rate. The rate data obtained in these experiments
were used to calculate an apparent second-order rate constant of
References
(1) Griffin, T. J.; Goodlett, D. R.; Aebersold, R. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001,
12, 607-612.
(2) Cravatt, B. F.; Sorensen, E. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 663-668.
(3) Moseley, M. A. Trends Biotechnol. 2001, 19, S10-S16.
(4) Mann, M.; Hendrickson, R. C.; Pandey, A. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2001,
70, 437-473.
(5) Van Roessel. P.; Brand, A. H. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, E15-E20.
(6) Griffin, B. A.; Adams, S. R.; Tsien, R. Y. Science 1998, 281, 269-272.
(7) Saxon, E.; Bertozzi, C. R. Annu. ReV. Cell DeV. Biol. 2001, 17, 1-23.
(8) Yarema, K. J.; Goon, S.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 553-
558.
(9) Saxon, E.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 2000, 287, 2007-2010.
(10) Kiick, K. L.; Saxon, E.; Tirrell, D. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 19-24.
(11) Schiedel, M.-S.; Briehn, C. A.; Ba¨uerle, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 4677-4680.
(12) The reaction can also be performed in strictly aqueous media, but the
solubility of phosphine 1 therein has a limit around 60 µM.
(13) This value is similar to that reported for the reaction of triphenylphosphine
with ethyl 2-azidoacetate in benzene (0.01 M-1 s-1). Leffler, J. E.; Temple,
R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5235-5246.
0.015 M-1 s-1 13
. This value suggests that relatively high concen-
trations (i.e., 100 µM to mM) of compound 1 will be required to
label azides present at low levels within metabolically labeled
biomolecules at an appreciable rate. Therefore, the low back-
ground fluorescence of compound 1 will be particularly im-
portant. Efforts are underway to increase the rate of reaction
by modulating the substituents on phosphorus. The application of
this tool in the detection and quantitation of azide-labeled post-
translational modifications in vitro and in vivo is also of significant
future interest.
JA029013Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 16, 2003 4709