propylene oxide to remove excess hydrogen chloride, giving (R)-
homopipecolic acid (7) in 93% yield. The specific rotation value
of (−)-7, [α]2D5 −24.0° (c: 0.4, H2O) was consistent with the
reported value,9a [α]D25 −23.4° (c: 0.4, H2O) (Scheme 2).
Subsequent transformations to (R)-pelletierine were straight-
forward (Scheme 3): acid (+)-6 was coupled with methoxy-
methylamine using EDC–HOBt activation protocol, yielding
Weinreb amide (+)-8 in 88% yield. Addition of 3.5 equivalents
of MeMgBr in THF at 0 °C yielded Cbz-protected pelletierine
(+)-9 in 86% yield as a colorless oil: [α]2D5 + 12.0° (c: 2.5,
CHCl3) (96.1% ee, (+)-9 tR 10.5 min; (−)-9 tR 11.7 min), (lit.28
[α]2D5 + 10.2° (c: 2.5, CHCl3). Exposure of N-protected pelletier-
ine (+)-9 in a hydrogen atmosphere to palladium on carbon in
ethyl acetate produced free pelletierine (−)-10 in 91% yield. The
specific rotation value of (−)-10, [α]2D5 −19.6° (c: 0.7, EtOH)
was also consistent with the reported value, [α]2D5 −22.1° (c: 4.1,
EtOH).29
Fig. 1 ORTEP drawing of (R,R)-tartrate salt of tropanol (+)-2.
In conclusion, enantiomeric syntheses of (R)-homopipecolic
acids and (R)-pelletierine have been achieved from (+)-6-tropa-
nol, available from Robinson annulation and followed by resol-
ution with (+)-tartaric acid. Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of 6-
tropanone (+)-4 provided lactone (−)-5 as a key intermediate.
The enantiomeric excess values of N-Cbz homopipecolic acid
(+)-6 and N-Cbz pelletierine (+)-9 have been confirmed by chiral
HPLC analysis, as well as their specific rotation values. Sub-
sequent extension of this methodology towards other natural pro-
ducts of interest is currently underway.
Scheme 2 Synthesis of (R)-homopipecolic acid (−)-7.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the National Science Council, Taiwan
(NSC98-2119-M-005-002-MY3) and the Instrument Center of
National Chung Hsing University for support of this research.
References
Scheme 3 Synthesis of (R)-pelletierine (−)-10.
1 For some leading references, see: (a) M. Hesse, Alkaloids: Nature’s
Curse or Blessing? Wiley-VCH, New York, 2002; (b) E. Fattorusso and
O. Taglialatela-Scafati, Modern Alkaloids: Structure, Isolation, Synthesis
and Biology, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008.
ee confirmed by chiral HPLC analysis ((+)-3 tR 5.6 min; (−)-3 tR
7.1 min). With enantiopure tropanol derivative (+)-3 in hand,
subsequent TEMPO-catalyzed bleach oxidation furnished ketone
(+)-4 in 93% yield. Reaction of ketone (+)-4 with one equivalent
of mCPBA in the presence of Na2HPO4 in CH2Cl2 resulted in a
selective Bayer–Villiger oxidation to provide lactone (−)-5.26
The amount of mCPBA was crucial in the reaction in that excess
of mCPBA brought about a yield decrease in this reaction.27
Lactone (−)-5 was a quite unstable substance in either acidic or
oxidative conditions. Silica gel purification of lactone (−)-5
resulted in the formation of 5,6-didehydropipecolic acid and
reduced the yield of the desired lactone. Thus, reduction of crude
lactone (−)-5 with triethylsilane–boron trifluoride in CH2Cl2 at
−78 °C afforded a 87% yield of N-Cbz homopipecolic acid
(+)-6 over two steps, as white solids: mp 72–74 °C, [α]2D5 + 2.8°
(c: 1.9, CHCl3) (93% ee, (+)-6 tR 19.4 min; (−)-6 tR
22.5 min).28 Chiral HPLC analysis of acid (+)-6 confirmed the
chiral integrity arrived intact during the processes mentioned
above. Thus, reflux in a 6 N HCl solution was carried out to
remove the Cbz protecting group, followed by treatment with
2 For excellent reviews about piperidines, see: (a) S. Laschat and
T. Dickner, Synthesis, 2000, 1781; (b) P. M. Weintraub, J. S. Sabol, J.
M. Kane and D. R. Borcherding, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 2953;
(c) M. G. P. Buffat, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 1701.
3 (a) S. Ciblat, P. Besse, V. Papastergiou, H. Veschambre, J.-L. Canet and
Y. Troin, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 2221; (b) M. Angoli,
A. Barilli, G. Lesma, D. Passarella, S. Riva, A. Silvani and B. Danieli,
J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 9525.
4 (a) S. Fustero, D. Jiménez, J. Moscardó, S. Catalán and C. del Pozo, Org.
Lett., 2007, 9, 5283; (b) E. C. Carlson, L. K. Rathbone, H. Yang, N.
D. Collett and R. G. Carter, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 5155.
5 G. Kumaraswamy and A. Pitchaiah, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 2536.
6 T. M. Shaikh and A. Sudalai, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 3437.
7 (a) I. Coldham, S. Raimbault, P. T. Chovatia, J. J. Patel, D. Leonori, N.
S. Sheikh and D. T. E. Whittaker, Chem. Commun., 2008, 4174; (b) T.
K. Beng and R. E. Gawley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 12216;
(c) I. Coldham and D. Leonori, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 4069.
8 (a) T. A. Johnson, M. D. Curtis and P. Beak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001,
123, 1004; (b) T. A. Johnson, D. O. Jang, B. W. Slafer, M. D. Curtis and
P. Beak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11689.
9 (a) S. G. Davies, A. M. Fletcher, P. M. Roberts and A. D. Smith, Tetrahe-
dron, 2009, 65, 10192; (b) A. M. Chippindale, S. G. Davies,
K. Iwamoto, R. M. Parkin, C. A. P. Smethurst, A. D. Smith and
H. Rodriguez-Solla, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 3253.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 2518–2520 | 2519