The 2-Oxocyclohexanecarboxylic Acid Keto−Enol System
A R T I C L E S
analysis on the solid and found that it is in fact the enol.5 We
consequently used this material directly for most of our
subsequent work.
Results and Discussion
Reaction Identification. Flash photolysis of aqueous solu-
tions of 2-diazocycloheptane-1,3-dione (7) or 2,2-dimethyl-
5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo-4H-1,3-dioxin-4-one (8) produced a
rapid rise in absorbance in the region λ ) 270-290 nm followed
by a much slower decay. These absorbance changes are similar
to those found in our previous studies of â-oxocarboxylic keto-
enol systems2-4 and, by analogy with the previous work, may
be assigned to hydration of 2-oxocyclohexylideneketene (5),
giving the enol of 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (6), fol-
lowed by ketonization of this enol to the acid itself, 4, eq 4.
Experimental Section
Materials. 2-Diazocycloheptane-1,3-dione (7) was prepared by diazo
group transfer from tosyl azide to cycloheptane-1,3-dione.6 A material
at first believed to be 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (4) was prepared
by base-catalyzed hydrolysis of ethyl 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylate;
this produced a solid, mp 82-83°, whose X-ray analysis showed it to
be the enol isomer (6) of 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid.5 2,2-
Dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo-4H-1,3-dion-4-one (8) was prepared
from this enol plus acetone.7 All other materials were best available
commercial grades.
pKa Determination. The acidity constant of 2-oxocyclohexanecar-
boxylate ion ionizing further as a carbon acid was determined by
monitoring the reversible absorbance change at λ ) 276 nm that took
place as this reaction occurred. Absorbance measurements were made
using a Carey 2200 spectrometer whose cell compartment was
thermostated at 25.0 ( 0.05 °C.
This assignment is supported by the response of these absor-
bance changes to acid-base catalysis (vide infra).
Kinetics. Rates of hydration of 2-oxocyclohexylideneketene (5) were
measured using a nanosecond excimer laser flash photolysis system
operating at λ ) 248 nm that has already been described,8 and rates of
ketonization of the 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid enol (6) thus
produced were measured with a conventional microsecond (flash lamp)
flash photolysis system that has also already been described.9 The
temperature of the reacting solutions was maintained at 25.0 ( 0.05
°C, and photolysis substrate concentrations were of the order of 3 ×
10-5 M. Reactions were followed by monitoring absorbance changes
at λ ) 270-290 nm, and observed first-order rate constants were
calculated for the most part by least-squares fitting of an expontential
function. In some of the slower runs, however, instability of the
monitoring light source produced an absorbance drift, and a linear term
was consequently added to the exponential function. Rates of the very
slow reactions were measured by first generating the enol with a single
pulse from the conventional flash system and then quickly transferring
the ketonizing solution to a Cary 2200 spectrometer for reaction
monitoring with that instrument. Once again, the temperature of reacting
solutions was maintained at 25.0 ( 0.0 °C.
Ketene Hydration. Rates of hydration of 2-oxocyclohexy-
lideneketene, 5, were measured in dilute aqueous perchloric acid
and sodium hydroxide solutions and in biphosphate ion, tris-
(hydroxymethyl)methylammonium ion, and ammonium ion
buffers. The ionic strength of these solutions was maintained
at 0.10 M through addition of sodium perchlorate as required.
The ketene was generated by photo-Wolff reaction of diazo
compound 7 in the perchloric acid and buffer solutions. This
substrate, however, was unstable in sodium hydroxide solutions,
undergoing base-catalyzed ring cleavage,10 and dioxinone 8 was
therefore used as the flash photolytic substrate here instead.
Concordant results were obtained with the two substrates. The
data are summarized in Tables S1-S3.11
The rate measurements in buffers were performed in series
of solutions of constant buffer ratio and, because the ionic
strength was constant, also constant hydronium ion concentra-
tion, but varying buffer concentration. Observed first-order rate
constants proved to be linearly proportional to buffer concentra-
tion, and the data were therefore analyzed by linear least-squares
fitting of the buffer dilution expression shown as eq 5. The zero-
buffer-concentration intercepts, kint, obtained in this way,
Rates of ketonization in solutions prepared using solid enol were
also measured using the Cary spectrometer. Stock solutions of enol in
acetonitrile were prepared, and ketonizations were then initiated by
injecting a few microliters of these stock solutions into 3.0 mL of wholly
aqueous reaction mixtures. Some ketonization took place slowly in these
acetonitrile stock solutions, but useful amounts of enol still remained
even 1 day after preparation.
kobs ) kint + kbuff[buffer]
(5)
Rates of enolization were measured by bromine scavenging of the
enol as it formed. Bromine concentrations were in the range (4-100)
× 10-5 M, and substrate concentrations were in the range (3.5-12) ×
10-5 M, with bromine always in excess. The ionic strength of these
solutions was maintained at 0.10 M through the addition of sodium
bromide, and reactions were followed by monitoring the absorbance
change of tribromide ion at λ ) 310 nm. The temperature of reacting
solutions was again maintained at 25.0 ( 0.05 °C, and observed first-
order rate constants were calculated by least-squares fitting of an
exponential function.
together with the rate constants determined in perchloric acid
and sodium hydroxide solutions, are displayed as the upper
rate profile shown in Figure 1. Hydronium ion concentra-
tions of the buffer solutions needed for this purpose were
obtained by calculation using literature values of the buffer acid
acidity constants and activity coefficients recommended by
Bates.12
This rate profile shows no acid catalysis, a long uncatalyzed
portion, and weak hydroxide-ion catalysis. Such behavior is
typical of ketene hydration reactions, which commonly show
(5) Lough, A. J.; Kresge, A. J.; Zhu, Y. Acta Crystallogr. 2003, E59, σ344-
σ346.
(6) Cossy, J.; Belotti, D.; Thellend, A.; Pete, J. P. Synthesis 1988, 720-721.
Regitz, M.; Maas, G. Diazo Compounds Properties and Synthesis;
Academic Press: New York, 1986; Chapter 13.
(10) Regitz, M.; Maas, G. Diazo Compounds Properties and Synthesis; Academic
Press: New York, 1986; pp 511-512. Chiang, Y.; Kresge, A. J.; Zhu, Y.
ARKIVOC 2001, 2, 108-115.
(7) Sato, M.; Ogasawara, H.; Oi, K.; Kato, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31,
1896-1901.
(8) Andraos, J.; Chiang, Y.; Huang, C. G.; Kresge, A. J.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10605-10610.
(11) Supporting Information; see paragraph at the end of this paper regarding
availability.
(9) Chiang, Y.; Hojatti, M.; Keeffe, J. R.; Kresge, A. J.; Schepp, N. P.; Wirz,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4000-4009.
(12) Bates, R. G. Determination of pH Theory and Practice; Wiley: New York,
1973; p 49.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 21, 2003 6479