B. K. Oh et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 2911–2913
2913
Table 5. Tandem 1,2-shift reaction and propargylation of
various epoxides
5. Dao-Li, D.; Zhong-Hui, L. Youji Huaxue. 1995, 15, 95.
6. Keith, F.; Mark, L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2319.
7. Raun, B. C.; Jana, U. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8212.
8. Yadav, J. S.; Anjaneyulu, S.; Ahmed, M. M.; Reddy, B.
V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2557.
9. (a) Grignard type reaction (typical procedure, entry 11): A
suspension of indium powder (157.1 mg, 1.36 mmol) and
allyl bromide (248.0 mg, 2.05 mmol) in 2 mL of DMF
was stirred until the metal dissolved completly. To the
allyl indium reagent generated as above, a solution of
2-styryloxirane (100 mg, 0.68 mmol) was added and
stirred for 1.5 h. After completion of the reaction, the
reaction mixture was quenched with 1N HCl and
extracted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was
dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and purified by column
chromatography (ethyl acetate:hexane=1:6) to afford the
products (80.6 mg; 11A, 9.5 mg; 11B, 70%).
Compound 11A: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 7.32 (m,
5H), 6.51 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (m, 1H), 5.87 (m,
1H), 5.19 (m, 2H), 3.18 (m, 1H), 2.42 (m, 4H); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): l 137.7, 135.0, 133.5, 128.9, 127.7,
126.6, 126.5, 118.5, 70.7, 41.7, 40.8; IR (KBr): 3501, 2940,
1655, 1477 cm−1; HRMS (CI, M−H+) calcd for C13H15O:
187.1123; found: 187.1122.
gave higher ratio of 1,2-shift and allylation than furanyl
epoxides, it might be due to the electron rich sulfur
stabilizing carbocation intermediate.
Compound 11B: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 7.22 (m,
5H), 6.43 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.00 (dd, J=15.9, 8.5 Hz,
1H), 5.74 (m, 1H), 5.01 (m, 2H), 3.62 (m, 1H), 3.49 (m,
1H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 2.22 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3): l 137.5, 136.5, 132.7, 131.1, 128.9, 127.8, 126.6,
116.9, 66.0, 46.14, 13.6; IR (KBr): 2943, 2904, 2301, 1588,
1480 cm−1; HRMS (CI, M−H+) calcd for C13H15O:
187.1123; found: 187.1119.
Propargylation of several vinyl epoxides were per-
formed with propargyl bromide (Table 5). In these
reactions, we could only obtain tandem 1,2-shift reac-
tion and propargylation or allenylation reaction. In the
case of entry 30, we also obtained a small amount of
further propagylation product C of product A.11
10. (b) Barbier type reaction (typical procedure, entry 20):
2-Oxiranylfuran (100 mg, 0.91 mmol) is added to the
solution of indium powder (208.5 mg, 1.82 mmol) and
allyl bromide (351.4 mg, 2.72 mmol) in 2 mL of THF and
stirred for 1 h. After completion of the reaction, the
reaction mixture was quenched with 1N HCl and
extracted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was
dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and purified by column
chromatography (ethyl acetate:hexane=1:7) to afford
products (70.6 mg; 20A, 46.8 mg; 20B, 85%).
In summary, we have described a facile and highly
efficient consecutive 1,2-shift reaction and allylation of
vinyl epoxides using indium metal and allylbromide or
propagyl bromide to afford bishomoallyl alcohols in
high yields.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Korea
Ministry of Science and Technology (Critical
Technology-21).
1
Compound 20A: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 7.27 (t,
J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (t, J=2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (d, J=3.1
Hz, 1H), 5.70 (m, 1H), 5.09 (m, 2H), 3.90 (m, 1H), 2.76
(m, 2H), 2.20 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l
153.0, 142.0, 134.8, 118.5, 110.7, 107.4, 69.9, 41.5, 35.8;
IR (KBr): 3450, 2940, 2804, 1588 cm−1; HRMS (CI,
M−H+) calcd for C9H11O2: 151.0759; found: 151.0758.
References
1. (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Asao, N. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2207;
(b) Li, C. J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5643.
1
Compound 20B: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 7.28 (t,
J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (t, J=2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (dd, J=3.2,
0.5 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (m, 1H), 4.98 (m, 2H), 3.70 (m, 2H),
2.93 (m, 1H), 2.35 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
l 156.1, 141.9, 136.1, 117.4, 110.4, 106.7, 65.0, 42.0, 34.8;
IR (KBr): 3454, 2840, 2804, 1608 cm−1; HRMS (CI,
M−H+) calcd for C9H11O2: 151.0759; found: 151.0755.
11. Schmid, W.; Klaps, E. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7537.
2. Araki, S.; Ito, H.; Bustugan, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1988,
1831.
3. (a) Taber, D. F.; Green, J. H.; Geremia, J. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 9342; (b) Overman, L. E.; Renhowe, P.
A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4138.
4. (a) Fleming, I.; Paterson, I. Synthesis 1979, 446; (b) Imai,
T.; Nishida, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4849.