TABLE 1. Rh2(OAc)4-Catalyzed Reaction of 1a-fa
TABLE 2. Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed Reaction of 2a-ea
entry
R
ratio (4:5)b
yieldc (%)
entry
R
ratio (6:7)b
yieldc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6f
Me
iPr
17:83
91:9
100:0
15:85
38:62
73:27
74
90
91
1
2
3
4
5
Me
iPr
0:100
65:35
100:0
2:98
87
53
85
68
97d
tBu
Ph
tBu
Ph
81
2-ClC6H4
2,6-Cl2C6H3
93d,e
56
2-ClC6H4
68:32
a If not specifically noted, the reaction was carried out in CH2Cl2 at room
temperature with 0.5 mol % Rh2(OAc)4. b Ratio was determined by 1H NMR
(400 MHz) of the crude product. c If not specifically noted, refer to the
isolated yield of the major products, which have Z configurations. d Both
(Z)- and (E)-isomers of 5e were isolated. e Refer to the combined yield of
the two products. f The reaction was carried out in refluxing 1,2-dichloro-
ethane.
a The reaction was carried out in CH2Cl2 at room temperature with 0.5
mol % Rh2(OAc)4. b Ratio was determined by 1H NMR (400 MHz) of the
crude product. c If not specifically noted, refer to the isolated yield of the
major product. d Refer to the combined yield of the two products.
TABLE 3. Rh2(OAc)4-Catalyzed Reaction of 3a-ea
With these diazo compounds in hand, we then proceeded to
examine the diazo decomposition under Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed
conditions. First, diazo compounds 1a-f were investigated. The
diazo decomposition occurred smoothly with Rh2(OAc)4 in
CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 1a-e to afford the 1,2-
migration products in excellent yields (Table 1, entries 1-5).
For 1f, the Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction at room temperature
was sluggish, presumably due to the steric hindrance around
the diazo group which blocks the approach of Rh(II) catalyst.
A similar problem has been encountered in our previous
studies.4b To substantiate this reasoning, 1f was treated with
catalytic TsOH with the expectation that protonic acid-catalyzed
diazo decomposition should not be sensitive to steric hindrance.
However, the reaction only gave a complex mixture under these
conditions. On the other hand, the Rh(II)-catalyzed reaction of
1f occurred efficiently in refluxing 1,2-dichloroethane (Table
1, entry 6).
entry
3a-e, SiRR′R′′
ratio (8:9)b
yieldc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
3a, SiMe3
11:89
10:90
9:91
9:91
4:96
57d
72d
79
3b, SiMe2Ph
t
3c, SiMe2 Bu
3d, SiEt3
82d
92
3e, Si tBuPh2
a The reaction was carried out in CH2Cl2 at room temperature with 0.5
mol % Rh2(OAc)4. b Ratio was determined by 1H NMR (300 MHz) of the
crude product. c Refer to the isolated yield of the major product. d The
corresponding enol was obtained after separation with silica gel column.
3). For the series of 1d-f, the trend is similar, although the
product ratio change is less sensitive than that for 1a-c.
Next, the Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of 2a-e was inves-
tigated (Table 2). Our previous study has demonstrated that
Cl3CC(O)NH is more efficient than TsNH in promoting 1,2-
aryl migration.4b,d As shown in Scheme 1, only the 1,2-phenyl
migration product is observed in the case of ethyl diazoester.
In the Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of 2a-e, a similar change
of migratory aptitude was observed, as shown by the data
collected in Table 2. Again, the steric bulkiness effectively
overrides the electronic effects.
Finally, the steric effect of â substituent on the 1,2-migration
was investigated through Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of 3a-e
(Table 3). The previous study has demonstrated that 1,2-H
migration predominates when the bystander is an electron-
donating group, such as hydroxyl or alkyl group.4 In the reaction
of 3a, in which the â substituent is trimethylsiloxy, the ratio of
1,2-phenyl migration vs 1,2-hydride migration is 8:1 (Table 3,
entry 1). Since a siloxy substituent is considered an electron-
donating group in general, this result is not in accordance with
the previous observations. Here, the steric bulkiness of the
trimethylsiloxy group might be more determinant in affecting
the migratory aptitude. This rationalization is supported by the
Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of 3b-e, in which the size of
siloxy substituent is gradually increased. As shown by the data
in Table 3, more 1,2-phenyl migration is observed when the
â-siloxy substituent becomes bulkier.
The configuration of the products could be easily identified
1
as indicated by H NMR the existence of hydrogen bonding
between N-H and the carbonyl group. In most cases, only (Z)-
isomers were obtained for both 1,2-H and 1,2-Ph migrations.
Our previous study has shown that the NHTs group switches
the 1,2-migration from 1,2-H to 1,2-Ph. In the case of 1a, in
which the R is a relatively small methyl group, the 1,2-Ph
migration predominates (Table 1, entry 1). When R is switched
i
to a bulkier Pr group, the ratio is completely reversed (Table
1, entry 2). When the size of R is further increased to tBu, only
the 1,2-H migration product could be obtained (Table 1, entry
(3) For reviews, see: (a) Nickon, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 84-89.
(b) Liu, M. T. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 287-294. For recent study,
see: (c) Farlow, R. A.; Thamattoor, D. M.; Sunoj, R. B.; Hadad, C. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3257-3265. (d) Keating, A. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M.
A.; Houk, K. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 8467-8476.
(4) (a) Jiang, N.; Qu, Z.; Wang, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2989-2992. (b)
Jiang, N.; Ma, Z.; Qu, Z.; Xing, X.; Xie, L.; Wang, J. J. Org Chem. 2003,
68, 893-900. (c) Shi, W.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, S.; Wu, W.; Du, D.; Wang, J.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2243-2246. (d) Shi, W.; Xiao, F.; Wang, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 4318-4322. (e) Xu, F.; Shi, W.; Wang, J. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4191-4194.
(5) For the experimental details of the synthesis of 1a-f, 2a-e, and
3a-e and the characterization data for new compounds, see Supporting
Information. (a) Jiang, N.; Wang, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1285-
1287. (b) Bardot, V.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Gramain, J.-C.; Remuson, R.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1111-1114.
5790 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 15, 2006