D. R. Owen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 92–96
95
Dose
Cl
Vd
T1/2
Structure
Entry
Study
ppb
0%
Foral
-
(mg/kg)
(ml/min/kg)
(L/kg)
(h)
NH2
Rat i.v.
2
13.4
3.1
2.7
N
2
O
OH
N
Rat oral
Rat i.v.
Rat oral
Hu. i.v.
5
2
-
10.2
-
-
2.1
2.1
2.4
4
9.8%
O
1.9
-
-
10.6%
-
NH2
OH
N
1
0%
5
N
O
10
1.5
0.5
Figure 4. Pharmacokinetic comparison of compounds 1 and 2.
to the primary amine at the side-chain terminus were costly. A
simple methylation reduced activity almost 100-fold. Absolute
stereochemistry was also important as seen in compound 12. This
enantiomer of the leading oxygenated analogue 2 was completely
inactive against TAFIa.
The somewhat surprising conclusion to this SAR study was that
we were unable to significantly enhance potency beyond 6 nM
despite having up to six lipophilic heavy atoms to use, before
compromising our small, polar drug properties. On assessing the
optimal combination of potency, selectivity and the potential
for good oral bioavailability/pharmacokinetics, the programme
decided to profile compound 2 further.
Compound 2 was assessed in both iv and oral rat pharmacoki-
netic studies ( Fig. 4). In the iv study (2 mg/kg), the compound
had a relatively low clearance of 13.4 ml/min/kg and had no plas-
ma protein binding. The clearance was higher than expected. It was
three times higher than the glomerular filtration rate for rat that
would have indicated passive renal clearance for the compound.
However, the volume of distribution of 3.1 l/kg was also higher
than expected for such a small, polar zwitterion. The rat iv half-life
was 2.7 h. Oral pharmacokinetic studies at a dose of 5 mg/kg re-
vealed an oral bioavailability of ꢀ10% for compound 2. This overall
profile compared favourably with the equivalent rat data for clini-
cal candidate UK-396082 (1) which had a lower volume of distri-
bution, lower clearance and an iv half-life of 2.1 h.
error for those assays and models. Small changes in pharmacoki-
netics and primary pharmacology would have a significant effect
on clinical dose for these particular compounds. These would likely
manifest themselves in further clinical trials. Surprisingly, efforts
to enhance potency through addition of lipophilicity at the N-1 po-
sition of the imidazole made little impact, although addition of a
methyl group in the side-chain proved to be a good strategy for
regaining human CPB selectivity when required. These compounds
represent some of the most potent and selective TAFIa inhibitors
disclosed to date.4 In conjunction with reliable rat oral bioavail-
ability and a useful rodent half-life, compound 2 has significant po-
tential as a pre-clinical tool for further understanding the utility of
TAFIa inhibition as a mechanism for treating thrombosis or for
other potential emerging uses in non-cardiovascular indications.10
References and notes
1. Nesheim, M.; Bajzar, L. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 2139.
2. Bunnage, M. E.; Blagg, J.; Steele, J.; Owen, D. R.; Allerton, C.; McElroy, A. B.;
Miller, D.; Ringer, T.; Butcher, K.; Beaumont, K.; Evans, K.; Gray, A. J.; Holland, S.
J.; Feeder, N.; Moore, R. S.; Brown, D. G. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 6095.
3. Lee, K. J.; Joo, K. C.; Kim, E.-J.; Lee, M.; Kim, D. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1997, 5,
1989.
4. Bunnage, M. E.; Owen, D. R. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2008, 11, 480.
5. Price, D. A.; Blagg, J.; Jones, L.; Greene, N.; Wager, T. Exp. Opin. Drug Met. Toxicol.
2009, 5, 921.
6. Hopkins, A. L.; Groom, C. R.; Alex, A. Drug Discovery Today 2004, 9, 430.
7. Details of assay for TAFla inhibition (i) TAFI activation: Human TAFI
The carbon to oxygen switch in going from 1 to 2 had been
designed to potentially moderate the primary amine basicity and
alter the carboxylic acid pKa. This could potentially affect the com-
pound’s half-life through small changes in volume of distribution,
but with minimal impact on clearance and oral bioavailability.
Although exemplified in a very different chemotype, the ethanol-
amine side-chain has previously been employed by these laborato-
ries to extend compound half-life in the discovery of the calcium
channel antagonist amlodipine.9 From the rat iv pharmacokinetic
data, compound 2 has the potential for a comparable human
half-life to C-linked compound 1. Given the chemotype physico-
chemistry, dramatic changes in half-life are unlikely through the
structural changes made (compounds have a low volume of distri-
bution, low clearance and no plasma protein binding). The mea-
sured change in the rat pharmacokinetic data for compound 2
compared to compound 1 falls within experimental error.
In conclusion, compound 2 has a comparable pre-clinical profile
to previously disclosed clinical candidate 1. The apparent small
improvements made in primary pharmacology and pharmacoki-
netics through the design of compound 2 fall within experimental
(recombinant or purified) was activated by incubating 20
(360 g/ml) with 10 l of human thrombin (10NIH units/ml), 10
thrombomodulin (30 g/ml), 6 l calcium chloride (50 mM) in 50 l
HEPES (N-10 [2-hydroxyethyl]piperazine-N-[2-ethanesulfonic acid]) buffer
containing 150 mM sodium chloride and 0.01% TWEEN 80 (polyoxyethylene-
sorbitan monooleate) pH 7.6 for 20 min at 22 °C. At the end of the incubation
l
l of stock solution
l of rabbit
l of 20 mM
l
l
l
l
l
period, thrombin was neutralised by the addition of 10
Arg chloromethyl ketone) (100 nM). The resulting TAFla solution was stored on
ice for 5 min and finally diluted with 175 of HEPES buffer. (ii) Ki
determination (TAFla): A number of different dilutions of the test compound
in water were made up. To 20 l of each dilution were added 150 l of HEPES
buffer and 10 l of TAFla, which was then pre-incubated for 15 min at 24 °C. To
each dilution was then added 20 l furylacryloyl-alanyl-lysine (FAAL) at a
ll of PPACK (D Phe-Pro-
l
l
l
l
l
l
standard concentration. Substrate turnover was measured by reading the
absorbance of the reaction mixture at 330 nm every 15 s for 30 min. The
reaction was performed at 24 °C and samples were mixed for 3 s prior to each
absorbance reading.
A graph of %inhibition against test compound
concentration was then plotted; from which was calculated the IC50 value.
The Ki value was then calculated using the Cheng–Prusoff equation. Two
controls, positive and negative, were used to check the accuracy of the results
in each case. For the first control, the assay was performed as above, but with
20 ll of water rather than a dilution of the test compound. This showed
minimal inhibition. For the second control, the assay was performed as above,
but with an effective amount of a non-specific carboxypeptidase inhibitor
rather than a dilution of the test compound. This showed maximal inhibition.
When the two controls did not demonstrate minimal and maximal inhibition