anions by NÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonds, while in 2 a one-
dimensional coordination polymer is formed via amino-
pyrimidine bridging. The 3,5-dinitrobenzoate anion behaves
as a versatile connector: in 1 É H O only the CO groups are
2
2
involved in intermolecular interactions, while in 2 one of the
NO groups is engaged in CÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonding and
the CO group is weakly bonded to the silver(I) ion. This dif-
ference is obviously related to the di†erent donating behaviors
2
2
of methylimidazole and aminopyrimidine mentioned above:
in 1 the uncoordinated NH groups of the [Ag(MeIm) ]`
2
cation make it possible to form NÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonds
with the acetate group of dinitrobenzoate anions, therefore
generating a ring structure. But in 2 aminopyrimidine acts as
a bridging ligand to connect two Ag(I) ions, so the dinitoben-
zoate anion prefers to interact with the Ag(I) ion via its acetate
group and to form intramolecular NÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonds
with the NH group [N5É É ÉO1a 2.913(4), N5É É ÉO2 2.903(4)
A].
Fig. 2 Extended 1D coordination polymer [Ag(APym)(DNB)] in 2
2
=
bridged by 2-aminopyrimidine.
In summary, assembly of an organicÈinorganic hybrid
cyclic aggregate and a two-dimensional network have been
investigated by selecting the same silver(I) 3,5-dinitrobenzoate
moiety and comparable 2-methylimdazole and 2-
aminopyrimidine ligands. The di†erent intermolecular inter-
actions play an important role in the assembly process and
the Ðnal structures are controlled by the donating behaviors
of the ligands. This may be an example for the creation of
ordered solid materials by utilizing coordination bonds as well
as various intermolecular interactions, based on the strategy
incorporating both techniques used in organic and inorganic
systems.
bonds [Ag1ÈN4 2.215(5), Ag1ÈN3 2.363(5) A] are somewhat
longer than those in 1, while the AgÈO bond [Ag1ÈO1
2.274(4) A] is comparable with those in nitrate coordination
complexes.27,28 It is interesting that two of the ring pyrim-
idine hydrogen atoms are engaged in CÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen
bonding with the O3 atom belonging to the neighboring co-
ordination polymer. The ordered two-dimensional network is
thus assembled as shown in Fig. 3. The topology of the
network can be simpliÐed to regard Apym as a four-
connecting node, with DNB and the Ag(I) as three-connecting
nodes. Therefore, two pyrimidine rings are connected by two
AgÈN coordination bonds and two CÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonds
to compose a tetragon. Such tetragons share vertices to form
one-dimensional arrays that are further linked by 3,5-dinitro-
benzoate anions through the remaining vertices. So the
network is composed of equal numbers of tetragons sharing
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China and Natural Science Foundation of
Guangdong Province.
vertices and hexagons sharing edges with tetragons. The NH
group of 2-aminopyrimidine in 2 is not involved in coordi-
2
References
nation, but signiÐcantly interacts with the silver(I) ion of the
adjacent network [Ag1É É ÉN5b 2.658(5) A]. Therefore, a ribbon
double layer architecture is constructed and the whole crystal
structure is stacked up by such double layers.
1
2
M. J. Zaworotko, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1121.
S. B. Copp, S. Subramanian and M. J. Zaworotko, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 8720.
3
A. J. Blake, N. R. Champness, S. S. M. Chung, W. S. Li and M.
Schroder, Chem Commun., 1997, 1005.
Comparison of the present two structures may provide
clues to the design of new solid materials. Both 2-
methylimidazole and 2-aminopyrimidine have 1,3-positioned
nitrogen donors, and a similar bridging coordination mode is
rationally expected once the NH group of imidazole is depro-
tonated.11h18 However, when 2-methylimidazole retains its
NH group to act as a hydrogen bond donor, signiÐcant di†er-
ences may result. In complex 1 É H O linear [Ag(MeIm) ]`
4
5
6
E. C. Constable, Chem Commun., 1997, 1073.
C. B. Aakeroy and A. M. Beatty, Cryst. Eng., 1997, 1, 39.
A. J. Blake, N. R. Champness, P. Hubberstey, W. S. Li, M. A.
Withersby and M. Schroder, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1999, 183, 117.
G. R. Desiraju, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 2311.
C.-Y. Su, B.-S. Kang, H.-Q. Liu, Q.-G. Wang and T. C. W. Mak,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 1551.
7
8
2
2
9
C.-Y. Su, B.-S. Kang, Q.-G. Wang and T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton T rans., 2000, 1831.
coordination motifs are joined with 3,5-dinitrobenzoate
10 C.-Y. Su, B.-S. Kang, Q.-C. Yang and T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton T rans., 2000, 1857.
11 T. L. Hennigar, D. MacQuarrie, P. Losier, R. D. Rogers and
M. J. Zaworotko, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 972.
12 C. V. K. Sharma and R. D. Rogers, Cryst. Eng., 1997, 1, 19.
13 G. Smith, B. A. Cloutt, D. E. Lynch, K. A. Byriel and C. H. L.
Kennard, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 3236.
14 P. J. Steel, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1990, 106, 227.
15 R. J. Sundberg and R. B. Martin, Chem. Rev., 1974, 74, 471.
16 C. I. H. Ashby, C. P. Cheng, E. N. Duesler and T. L. Brown, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 6063.
17 S. TroÐmenko, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1986, 34, 115.
18 L. Carlucci, G. Ciani, D. M. Proserpio and A. Sironi, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 2755.
19 K. Nomiya, K. Tsuda and N. C. Kasuga, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
T rans., 1998, 1653.
20 N. Masciocchi, M. Moret, P. Cairati, A. Sironi, G. A. Ardizzoia
and G. La Monica, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton T rans., 1995, 1671.
21 N. Masciocchi, M. Moret, P. Cairati, A. Sironi, G. A. Ardizzoia
and G. La Monica, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 7668.
22 C. B. Acland and H. C. Freeman, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton T rans.,
1971, 1016.
Fig. 3 Top view of the 2D network consisting of 1D chains consoli-
dated by CÈHÉ É ÉO hydrogen bonds in 2.
New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 479È482
481