imidate 6 was isolated in 42% yield. The imidate structure
for 6 was first assigned on the basis of its characteristics
measured by NMR. While 1H NMR at 600 MHz showed no
signal corresponding to the 2-NH expected in the wanted
trisaccharide, an exchangeable signal coupling to H-4 of the
glucosamine unit was identified at 3.90 ppm supporting the
presence of the free 4-OH group. In accordance with the
few examples of N-methyl glycosyl acetimidates reported
by Sinay¨ et al.7 a signal assigned to the rhamnosyl H-1′′
was found at 6.08 ppm. In addition, an HMBC experiment
showed a long-range correlation between this signal and a
quaternary carbon at 162 ppm, which was assigned to the
imidate carbon CdN. In the 13C NMR spectrum the
rhamnosyl anomeric carbon gave a signal at lower chemical
shift (92 ppm) than that expected for an O-glycoside (∼100
that, depending on their stability and the reaction conditions,
may or may not rearrange to the thermodynamic glycosides
constitutes a third explanation to the low reactivity toward
glycosylation of the 4-OH group in N-acetylglucosamine
derivatives.
1
Careful study of the H NMR spectrum measured for 7
dissolved in CDCl3 showed unusual features. The coupling
3
1
constants JH-1,H-2 and JC-1,H-1 measured for the glu-
cosamine ring were respectively 4.2 and 168 Hz and did not
4
support the expected C1 conformation for this residue. As
observed for Fuc H-5′′ in protected10,15 and deprotected6 Lea-
containing oligosaccharides, we also expected that, providing
they had similar conformations, H-5′′ in the rhamnose
analogue 7 would be deshielded to ∼4.7 ppm due to its
proximity to GlcNAc O-3, Gal O-4′, and Gal O-5′.6 However,
this signal was found at 4.30 ppm, a chemical shift typically
measured for H-5 of rhamnosyl residues when they are not
submitted to any deshielding effect.16 Therefore, it appears
that trisaccharide 7 has a different conformational behavior
than Lea derivatives. On the basis of the Karplus equation17
the 3JH-1,H-2 coupling constant can result from 7 existing as
a major conformer in which the glucosamine residue is
flattened leading to a dihedral angle ΦH-1,H-2 ≈ 130-140°.
However, since coupling constants measure averaged spin
couplings, 7 could also exist as a mixture of two conform-
ers: the 4C1 chair (ΦH-1,H-2 ≈ 180°) and a 1S3 skew
(ΦH-1,H-2 ≈ 110°). Low-temperature NMR experiments
(down to -55 °C) did not allow a conformational freeze
out, therefore if 7 exists as a mixture of conformers in CDCl3
the energy barrier to interconversion between these conform-
ers must be small. So far NMR experiments did not allow a
complete and unambiguous analysis of the conformational
behavior of 7 in CDCl3.
1
ppm). The JC,H coupling constant (177 Hz) measured for
this anomeric carbon was in perfect agreement with that of
an R-rhamnosidic linkage.14 Finally, the N-acetimidate methyl
group gave a signal at 16 ppm while the N-acetyl methyl
group in acceptor 4 was found at 24 ppm. The structure of
6 was further supported by HRCI-MS giving an observed
molecular ion [M + H] at 928.3427 for a calculated value
of 928.3450. The formation of imidates during the glyco-
sylation of N-acetylglucosamine glycosyl acceptors has long
been hypothesized by Hindsgaul et al.12 However, because
they are highly susceptible to hydrolysis and did not survive
chromatography on silica gel, no structural evidence could
be obtained. Although we did see degradation during workup
and purification steps, the imidate 6 was stable enough to
undergo a quick column chromatography and be obtained
in sufficient amounts and purity to permit its full character-
ization. When the amount of TESOTf was increased to 0.5
equiv and the reaction conducted overnight at room tem-
perature, only traces of 6 were seen by TLC. A new major
product was formed and isolated pure in 52% yield (Scheme
1, b). The NMR characteristics in CDCl3 for this new
compound showed the presence of an R-rhamnosyl residue
(H-1′′ 4.87 ppm, 1JC-1′′,H-1′′ ) 172 Hz) and the disappearance
of the glucosamine 4-OH signal while the NH signal was
found at 5.87 ppm. These assignments together with the
HRCI-MS data obtained for the molecular ion (found [M +
H] 928.3513, calcd 928.3450) led us to identify this
compound as being the wanted trisaccharide 7. Thus it
appears that higher temperature and concentration of TESOTf
favored the formation of the trisaccharide while the imidate
was readily formed at low temperature and concentration of
TESOTf. An obvious explanation is that imidate 6 formed
initially as the kinetic product of the reaction and then
rearranged to the thermodynamically more stable trisaccha-
ride 7 when the temperature and catalyst concentration were
high enough. To investigate this hypothesis the imidate 6
was allowed to rearrange in the conditions used when 7 was
formed. Indeed, the trisaccharide 7 was then isolated in 50%
yield while some degradation of the imidate giving the
acceptor 4 and the rhamnose hemiacetal was also observed
by TLC. Thus the competitive formation of kinetic imidates
Upon Zemple´n deacetylation trisaccharide 7 gave a
compound the NMR and HRCI-MS characteristics of which
did not present any conformational or structural abnormalities
and supported its identification as the mono-benzylated
analogue 12 (Scheme 2). However, since to our knowledge
this is the first time that a conformational behavior such as
that observed in trisaccharide 7 is being reported, we engaged
in an alternative synthesis of trisaccharide 12. To prevent
imidate formation and thus increase the reactivity of the
glycosyl acceptor toward glycosylation at O-4 of the glu-
cosamine residue, we investigated the methodology devel-
oped by Crich et al.11 in which the amino group in
glucosamine glycosyl acceptors was bis-acetylated. The
known4 disaccharide 8 was N-acetylated in the presence of
Hu¨nig’s base to give 9 that was converted to the wanted
glycosyl acceptor 10 by treatment with NaBH3CN/HCl. As
expected, the glycosylation of 10 with donor 5 could be
conducted at low temperature, using only 0.15 equiv of
TESOTf, and gave the trisaccharide 11 in excellent yield
(91%). Zemple´n deacetylation of 7 and 11 gave in both cases
(15) Lay, L.; Manzoni, L.; Schmidt, R. R. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 310,
157-171.
(16) Auzanneau, F.-I.; Bundle, D. R. Can. J. Chem. 1993, 71, 534-
548. Auzanneau, F.-I.: Forooghian, F.; Pinto, B. M. Carbohydr. Res. 1996,
291, 21-41.
(14) Bock, K.; Pedersen, C. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1974, 293-
297.
(17) Karplus, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2870-2871.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 15, 2003
2609