5HꢀNaphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenoxazineꢀ8,13ꢀdiones
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 56, No. 6, June, 2007
1133
2ꢀtertꢀButylꢀ5ꢀ(2´ꢀhydroxyꢀ5´ꢀmethylphenyl)ꢀ5Hꢀ
naphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenoxazineꢀ8,13ꢀdione (2b). M.p. 238—241 °C.
Found (%): C, 78.00; H, 5.36; N, 3.09. C31H25NO4. Calcuꢀ
lated (%): C, 78.32; H, 5.26; N, 2.95. 1H NMR (CDCl3), δ: 1.23
(s, 9 H, But); 2.30 (s, 3 H, Me); 5.97 (d, 1 H, H(3´), J = 8.5 Hz);
4.57 (br.s, 1 H, OH); 6.09 (d, 1 H, H(6), J = 8.5 Hz); 6.72 (dd,
1 H, H(4´), J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 = 3.0 Hz); 6.82 (d, 1 H, H(6´), J =
3.0 Hz); 6.98 (d, 1 H, H(1), J = 3.0 Hz); 7.02 (d, 1 H, H(4), J =
8.5 Hz); 7.12 (d, 1 H, H(7), J = 8.5 Hz); 7.45 (dd, 1 H, H(3),
J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 = 3.0 Hz); 7.66 (m, 2 H, H(10), H(11)); 8.10 (m,
2 H, H(9), H(12)). IR, ν/cm–1: 3430 (OH); 3035, 2963 (C—H);
1664 (C=O); 1590, 1522 (C=C). UVꢀVis, λmax/nm (logε): 268
(4.70), 313 (3.64), 403 (3.48), 560 (3.98). MS, m/z: 475 [M+].
2ꢀtertꢀButylꢀ5ꢀ(4´ꢀhydroxyꢀ3´,5´ꢀdimethylphenyl)ꢀ5Hꢀ
naphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenoxazineꢀ8,13ꢀdione (2c). M.p. 325—327 °C.
1H NMR (CDCl3), δ: 1.23 (s, 9 H, But); 2.29 (s, 6 H, 2 Me);
5.10 (br.s, 1 H, OH); 5.92 (d, 1 H, H(4), J = 8.5 Hz); 6.17 (d,
1 H, H(6), J = 8.5 Hz); 6.66 (dd, 1 H, H(3), J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 =
3.0 Hz); 6.90 (s, 2 H, H(2´), H(6´)); 7.00 (d, 1 H, H(1), J =
3.0 Hz); 7.63 (d, 1 H, H(7), J = 8.5 Hz); 7.72 (m, 2 H, H(10),
H(11)); 8.25 (m, 2 H, H(9), H(12)). IR, ν/cm–1: 3485 (OH);
3078, 2960, 2873 (C—H); 1664 (C=O); 1597, 1516 (C=C).
UVꢀVis, λmax/nm (logε): 264 (4.78), 313 (3.60), 405 (3.61), 560
stituted phenols can be attributed to the radical substituꢀ
tion of the hydrogen atom in phenol derivatives by this
intermediate biradical spiro complex. The experimentally
observed direction of the attack (ortho and para positions)
is consistent with the known features of the freeꢀradical
aromatic substitution.22,23
To summarize, we studied a new type of photoꢀ
transformations in the quinone series, viz., the photoꢀ
cyclization of 1ꢀaryloxyꢀ2ꢀazidoꢀ9,10ꢀanthraquinones in
the presence of phenols. 5HꢀNaphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenoxazineꢀ
8,13ꢀdiones, in which the nitrogen atom is covalently
bound to the phenyl ring of the introduced reagent, were
prepared in high yield. The present study demonstrated
that the aboveꢀdescribed photocyclization provides a conꢀ
venient oneꢀstep procedure for the synthesis of various
Nꢀsubstituted polycyclic derivatives of phenoxazine.
Experimental
The IR spectra were recorded on a Vectorꢀ22 (Bruker) specꢀ
trophotometer in KBr pellets. The UVꢀVis spectra were meaꢀ
sured on a Hewlett Packard Agilent 8453 spectrophotometer in
(3.90)
. Highꢀresolution mass spectrum, found: 489.1951 [M+].
1
ethanol (1•10–4 mol L–1). The H NMR spectra were recorded
C
32H27NO4. Calculated: M = 489.1940.
on a Bruker WРꢀ200SY instrument (the chemical shifts are given
on the δ scale) with SiMe4 as the internal standard. The EI mass
spectra were obtained on a Finnigan MATꢀ8200 instrument.
The TLC analysis was carried out on Silufol UVꢀ254 plates
using a 9 : 1 toluene—ethanol system as the eluent. The column
chromatography was carried out on silica gel (140—350 µm).
The solvents were dried before use. Photolysis was carried out
using light from a SVDꢀ120A lamp through an UFSꢀ1 light filter
(280—400 nm) and also with the use of the full spectrum of the
mercury lamp. The synthesis and physicochemical characterisꢀ
tics of the starting azidoanthraquinone 1 have been described
earlier.7
Preparative photolysis of azide 1 in the presence of phenols
(general procedure). A solution of compound 1 (0.4 g, 1 mmol)
and substituted phenol (3 mmol) in dry benzene (0.5 L) was
irradiated at 20 °C for 3—4.5 h until the starting compound
disappeared (TLC monitoring). The reaction solution was conꢀ
centrated, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel.
1ꢀHydroxyꢀ2ꢀ(4ꢀtertꢀbutylphenyl)aminoꢀ9,10ꢀanthraquinone
(0.01—0.02 g) was isolated from the first violet band by elution
with benzene. This product was identified by comparing with an
authentic sample.8 Then the major violet band was eluted with
chloroform. Products 2a—d were recrystallized from an ethaꢀ
nol—benzene mixture.
2ꢀtertꢀButylꢀ5ꢀ(4´ꢀhydroxyphenyl)ꢀ5Hꢀnaphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenꢀ
oxazineꢀ8,13ꢀdione (2a). M.p. 236—239 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3),
δ: 1.23 (s, 9 H, But); 5.92 (d, 1 H, H(4), J = 8.5 Hz); 6.13 (d,
1 H, H(6), J = 8.5 Hz); 6.66 (dd, 1 H, H(3), J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 =
3.0 Hz); 6.86 (br.s, 1 H, OH); 7.03 (d, 1 H, H(1), J = 3.0 Hz);
7.14 (br.s, 4 H, H(2´), H(3´), H(5´), H(6´)); 7.60 (d, 1 H, H(7),
J = 8.5 Hz); 7.73 (m, 2 H, H(10), H(11)); 8.25 (m, 2 H, H(9),
H(12)). IR, ν/cm–1: 3467 (OH); 3010, 2949, 2864 (C—H); 1666
(C=O); 1590, 1514 (C=C). UVꢀVis, λmax/nm (logε): 266 (4.72),
314 (3.63), 405 (3.46), 562 (4.00). Highꢀresolution mass specꢀ
trum, found: m/z 461.1635 [M+]. C30H23NO4. Calculated:
M = 461.1627.
2ꢀtertꢀButylꢀ5ꢀ(5´ꢀtertꢀbutylꢀ2´ꢀhydroxyphenyl)ꢀ5Hꢀ
naphtho[2,3ꢀc]phenoxazineꢀ8,13ꢀdione (2d). M.p. 192—195 °C.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δ: 1.22 and 1.29 (both s, 9 H each,
2 But); 5.94 (d, 1 H, H(3´), J = 8.5); 5.99 (d, 1 H, H(6), J =
8.5 Hz); 6.68 (dd, 1 H, H(4´), J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 = 3.0 Hz); 6.70 (d,
1 H, H(6´), J = 3.0 Hz); 7.14 (d, 1 H, H(1), J = 3.0 Hz); 7.18 (d,
1 H, H(4), J = 8.5 Hz); 7.31 (d, 1 H, H(7), J = 8.5 Hz); 7.44
(dd, 1 H, H(3), J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2 = 3.0 Hz); 7.59 (td, 1 H, H(10),
J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz); 7.66 (td, 1 H, H(11), J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 =
2.0 Hz); 7.75 (br.s, 1 H, OH); 8.00 (dd, 1 H, H(9), J1 = 8.0 Hz,
J2 = 2.0 Hz); 8.05 (dd, 1 H, H(12), J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz).
IR, ν/cm–1: 3400 (OH); 2960 (C—H); 1660 (C=O), 1590, 1522
(C=C). UVꢀVis, λmax/nm (logε): 266 (4.78), 313 (3.63), 410
(3.46), 560 (4.02). Highꢀresolution mass spectrum, found:
517.2241 [M+]. C34H32NO4. Calculated: M = 517.2253.
Xꢀray diffraction study of compound 2c. Xꢀray diffraction
data were collected on a Bruker P4 diffractometer (MoꢀKα raꢀ
diation, graphite monochromator, 2θ/θꢀscanning technique in
the range 2θ < 50°). A crystal of compound 2c of dimensions
0.60×0.36×0.03 mm was selected. The crystals are monoꢀ
clinic: a = 10.095(2) Å, b = 20.326(5) Å, c = 12.952(4) Å,
β = 110.32(2)°, V = 2492(1) Å3, space group P21/c, Z = 4,
C32H27NO4, dcalc = 1.305 g cm–3, µ = 0.086 mm–1. The intensiꢀ
ties of 4370 independent reflections were measured. The empiriꢀ
cal absorption correction was applied based on azimuthal scans
(the transmission was 0.79—0.98). The structure was solved by
direct methods using the SHELXSꢀ97 program package16 and
refined by the fullꢀmatrix leastꢀsquares method with anisotropic
displacement parameters for nonhydrogen atoms and isotropic
displacement parameters for H atoms using the SHELXLꢀ97
program package.16 The parameters of other H atoms (except
for OH) were calculated in each refinement cycle from the
coordinates of the corresponding carbon atoms. The hydrogen
atom of the hydroxy group at the O(3) atom was located in a
difference electron density map. The final refinement was carꢀ
ried out based on all F 2 to wR2 = 0.1926, S = 0.905, 339 variables