compounds 7h and 8k indicated that, whereas compound 7h
displayed a fluorinated oxazolo[3,2-c]pyrimidone structure, 8k
was an oxazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidone.∑
Finally, 7 and 8 underwent an oxazoline ring-opening
reaction with several nucleophiles under either basic (Method
A) or acidic (Method B) conditions, to give compounds 3§
(Scheme 1 and Table 3) in good to excellent yields.8,9.**
It is worth noting that uracil 3 was obtained as the only
reaction product regardless of whether compound 7, 8 or a
mixture thereof were used. In all examples, the ring-opening
reaction in acidic medium was faster (0.5–2 h) and produced
better yields (80–98%) than the corresponding reactions under
basic conditions (5–7 h; 72–80%).
To confirm the validity of our approach as a general method
of introducing a nucleophile into these systems, we attempted
the incorporation of the cyclic amine t-butyl 1-piperazine-
carboxylate†† (Scheme 2). Thus, 7g and 8g reacted with of N-
BOC-piperazine at 100 °C for 24 h, to yield the desired
compound 9 § in 80% yield, proving the validity of our
approach.
Scheme 2 Preparation of compound 9.
In summary, we have developed a straightforward synthesis
of new fluorinated uracil derivatives 3 from oxazolines 4 and
fluorinated nitriles 5 in only three steps and with good chemical
yields. The ring-opening reaction of intermediate oxazolopyr-
imidinones 7 and 8 by a number of different nucleophiles allows
the preparation of a variety of interesting analogues with
potential biological activity.
We thank the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología of Spain for
financial support (PPQ2000–0824). E.S. and J.P. thank the
Generalitat Valenciana and the Ministerio de Educación y
Cultura of Spain, respectively, for predoctoral fellowships.
Table 2 Results for the reaction of compounds 6 with triphosgene
Notes and references
‡ These compounds appeared exclusively in the enamino form.
§ Compounds 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 showed spectroscopic (1H, 19F, 13C-NMR)
and HRMS data in agreement with their structures.
¶ In our synthesis, substituting phosgene for triphosgene did not affect the
yields; thus, since triphosgene is easier to handle, we used one molar
equivalent of triphosgene in each reaction. An excess of triphosgene did not
influence the yields and proportion of the products.
Yield
(%)c
Isolated
products
b
Entrya
R2
RF
7/8d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
H
H
H
H
H
(R)-Ph
H
H
CF2(b-C10H7)
CF2(a-C10H7)
CF2C6H5
80
82
72
70
85
90
95
89
82
87
79
30/70
10/90
5/95
7a, 8a
8b
8c
7d + 8de
8e
(CF2)6CF3
10/90
20/80
10/90
35/65
30/70
35/65
30/70
30/70
CF2(b-C10H7)
CF2(b-C10H7)
2,4-F2C6H3
p-CF3C6H4
p-FC6H4
8f
∑ Full details of the X-ray structures of 7h and 8k will be published in a full
account of this work.
7g, 8g
7h, 8h
8i
7j, 8j
7k, 8k
** It is noteworthy that when treated with a base (e.g. aq. K2CO3/dioxane),
those compounds 3 in which Nu = Cl revert to a mixture 7 + 8 in
proportions similar to those when they were obtained from 8.
†† We chose this compound not only because it would allow for
introduction of other groups after N-BOC deprotection, but also because
analogous systems are present in several pharmaceutically significant
compounds, for example Ketanserine (see ref. 9), a 5-HT2 serotonin
antagonist drug, and Zopiclone, a recently discovered ansiolytic drug which
acts as a benzodiazepine receptor agonist (see ref. 10).
H
(R)-Ph
H
10
11f
p-FC6H4
p-CH3C6H4
a In all cases, R1 = H, except in entry 5, where R1 = CH3. b b-C10H7 = b-
naphtyl; a-C10H7 = a-naphtyl. c Yield of 7 + 8 crude mixture. d Proportion
7/8 in the crude reaction mixture, as determined through 1H and/or 19F NMR
analysis. e The separation of this mixture was not possible. f Non-
fluorinated derivative.
1 Nucleosides and Nucleotides as Antitumor and Antiviral Agents, ed. C.
K. Chu and D. C.Baker, Plenum Press, New York, 1993.
2 S. Ozaki, Med. Res. Rev., 1996, 16, 51–86.
Table 3 Results for the ring-opening reaction of pyrimidinones 7 and/or 8
with nucleophiles. Synthesis of uracils 3
3 As examples, see: T. Yoshimoto and S. Yuzuru, Eur. Pat. Appl. N°
1122244 A1, 2001; G. Theodoridis and S. Crawford (FMC Corporation,
USA) N° 6277847 B1, 2001; V. Kamesweran, (American Cyanamid
Co. USA) N° 6191275 B1, 2001; K. Yagi, K. Akimoto, N. Mimori, T.
Miyake, M. Kudo, K. Arai and S. Ishii, Pest Manag. Sci., 2000, 56,
65–73.
4 K. Kamata, I. Agata and A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
3113–3116.
5 C. C. Kotoris, M.-J. Chen and S. Taylor, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
8052–8057.
6 W. J. Middleton and E. M. Bingham, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45,
2883–2887.
7 For a review see: L. Cotarca, P. Delogu, A. Nardelli and V. Sunji,
Synthesis, 1996, 553–576.
8 R. Lis, T. K. Morgan, A. J. Marisca, R. P. Gómez, J. M. Lind, D. D.
Davey and G. B. Philips and M.E. Sullivan, J. Med. Chem., 1990, 33,
2883–2891; C. Agami, L. Dechoux, L. Hamon and M. Melaimi, J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 65, 6666–6669 and references cited therein.
9 J. L. Herndon, A. Ismaiel, P. Ingher, M. Teitle and R. A. Glennon, J.
Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 4903–4910.
Entrya R2
RF
Nu
Methodb Yield (%)c
3
1
2
3
4
5
H
H
H
H
H
CF2(b-C10H7) Cl
B
98
80
96
72
95
92
75
91
78
72
78
92
75
80
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
CF2(a-C10H7) OMe
A
B
A
B
CF2C6H5
Cl
OH
(CF2)6CF3
CF2(b-C10H7) Cl
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
(R)-Ph CF2(a-C10H7) Cl
Bd
A
B
H
H
H
H
H
2,4-F2C6H3
2,4-F2C6H3
p-CF3C6H4
p-CF3C6H4
p-FC6H4
OH
Cl
OMe
OH
OEt
Cl
A
A
A
Bd
A
B
3j
3k
3m
3n
3o
(R)-Ph p-FC6H4
H
H
p-CH3C6H4
p-CH3C6H4
OAc
Cl
a In all cases, R1 = H, except in entry 5, where R1 = CH3. b Method A:
RONa/ROH, THF, reflux. Method B: HCl/dioxane, THF, rt. c Yield of
purified product. d At 50 °C.
10 S. Noble, H. Langtry and H. M. Lamb, Drugs, 1998, 55, 277–302.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 844–845
845