628
M.J. Mayoral et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 6 (2003) 626–629
2.2. Preparation of c-½PdCl2ðpypzR2Þ ðR ¼ ddp 5, tdp 6,
hdp 7, odp 8Þ
Table 2
Phase properties of pypzR2 (1–4) and c-[PdCl2ðpypzR2Þ] (R ¼ ddp, tdp,
hdp, odp) (5–8) determined by DSC
DH (kJ molÀ1
)
To a solution of the corresponding pypzR2 (1–4) li-
gand (0.015 mmol) in 20 ml of dichloromethane was
added [PdCl2ðPhCNÞ2] (0.015 mmol). After 1 h stirring
at ca. 40 °C, the solvent was reduced and the addition of
hexane led to the precipitation of a yellow solid that was
isolated by filtration, washed with hexane and dried in
vacuo. Yields: 74–85%.
Transition
T (°C)
1
2
Crys ! I
71.0
47.3
I ! SmA
44.1
30a
)4.4
)5.7
SmA ! Crys
3
I ! SmA
48.8
37a
SmA ! Crys
4
5
I ! Crysb
52.1
)59.6
Crys ! Crys0
Crys0 ! SmA
SmA ! I
89.7
132.0
144.1
36.8
31.7
4.1
3. Results and discussion
The ligands pypzR2 (1–4) and their related com-
plexes c-[PdCl2ðpypzR2Þ] (5–8) were characterised by
analytical and spectroscopic (1H NMR and IR) tech-
niques, all data being in agreement with the proposed
molecular formulation. Additionally, thermal studies
by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and pola-
rising light microscopy were also made for all com-
pounds.
6
7
8
Crys ! Crys0
Crys0 ! SmA
SmA ! I
Crys ! Crys0
Crys0 ! SmA
SmA ! I
Crys ! Crys0
Crys0 ! SmA
SmA ! I
95.8
129.4
148.8
32.4
31.7
1.4
95.6
124.9
153.9
27.7
42.8
3.4
97.8
119.4
147.8
9.9
43.4
3.1
1
The H NMR spectra of 5–8, at room temperature
a Data obtained by polarising light microscopy.
in CDCl3 solution (Table 1), show all the expected
ligand signals. Related to the pyrazole group, the
H(4) and alkyloxyphenyl protons are scarcely shifted,
and the non-equivalence of the two lateral chains
observed on the free ligands is maintained on the
complexes. The general behaviour of the pyridyl
protons deals with small shifts upfield and downfield
of the H(3) and H(6) protons, respectively, in
agreement with a N co-ordination of the pyridyl
group.
The IR spectra of the complexes in solid state show
the characteristic bands of the pyridylpyrazol groups,
slightly modified upon co-ordination. As a general fea-
ture, the c(CH) band of the pyridyl group at ca.
788 cmÀ1 is shifted ca. 20 cmÀ1 to lower frequencies
than in the free ligand, according to a N-pyridyl co-or-
dination.
b A SmA mesophase could be observed near the solidification point
by polarising light microscopy.
detected by polarising light microscopy in a narrow
temperature range of ca. 2 °C.
The above ligands 1–4 were co-ordinated to the PdCl2
group giving rise to the complexes c-[PdCl2ðpypzR2Þ] (5–
8), all of them exhibiting an enantiotropic SmA meso-
phase (Fig. 3(b)). This is a new example of induction of
mesomorphism by co-ordination to a metal centre. The
stability of the mesophases increases smoothly as the
alkyloxy chain length is longer.
By comparison of the mesomorphic properties of
t-[PdCl2ðHpzRÞ2] and c-[PdCl2ðpypzR2Þ], we can deduce
that lowering the symmetry of related molecular struc-
tures as synthetic strategy has been successful, increasing
the stability temperature range of the mesophases.
However, the accessibility of mesophases on c-[PdCl2
ðpypzR2Þ] (5–8) was not appreciably modified in relation
to t-[PdCl2ðHpzRÞ2] [9]. This fact could suggest that the
structural relationship (width to length) in both types of
complexes operate in opposite sense to that of the mo-
lecular asymmetry. However, in both cases it was ob-
served that an increase in the length of lateral chain led
to a decrease in the stability of the crystal phase, which
is reflected by the lowering in the melting points. At the
same time, the clearing temperatures also raised,
thereby increasing the range of existence of the liquid
crystal behaviour. This fact is more pronounced in 5–8
due to the high asymmetry of the pyridylpyrazole
complexes.
3.1. Thermal studies
The transition temperatures and enthalpies deter-
mined by DSCare listed in Table 2 and Fig. 3 shows the
textures of the mesophases.
The ligands 2 and 3, as their counterpart 3,5-disub-
stituted pyrazoles HpzR2 [7], were found to be mesogens,
the transition temperatures being lower for the former
compounds. So 2 and 3 exhibit a monotropic SmA
mesophase in the temperature range of 44–48 °C(Fig.
3(a)), at difference of the 100–200 °Crange observed for
HpzR2. By contrast, compound 1, containing the
shortest chain (R ¼ ddp, n ¼ 12), does not exhibit me-
somorphic behaviour and 4 (R ¼ odp, n ¼ 18), with the
longest substituents, shows a SmA mesophase only