G Model
PHYTOL 548 1–6
2
S. Morel et al. / Phytochemistry Letters xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
48
49
50
51
52
[
a
]
D and MS) with those reported in the literature: four flavanones,
5,30,40-trihydroxy-6-( -dimethylallyl)-600,600-dimethylpyrano-
g,g
(200,300:7,8)-flavanone (2) (Shiao et al., 2005), dorsmanine I (3)
(Ngadjui et al., 2000), lonchocarpol A (4) (Innok et al., 2009), 6,8-
diprenyleriodictyol (5) (Harborne et al., 1993) previously isolated
53 Q2 from Derris laxiflora (Young Ho et al., 1995); four isoflavones,
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
genistein (6) previously isolated from from Derris scandens
(Mahabusarakam et al., 2004), pratensein (7) (Almeida et al.,
2008), prunetin (8) (Lu et al., 2008) previously isolated from Derris
elliptica (Lu et al., 2008) and D. laxiflora (Lin et al., 1991), 5-
hydroxy-7,30,40-trimethoxyisoflavone (9) (Veitch et al., 2003) and
two phenolic derivatives: coniferyl aldehyde (10) (Miyazawa and
Hisama, 2003) described in patent by Leschot et al. (2007) and 40-
methoxycinnamic acid (11) (Rahman and Moon, 2007).
Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow powder, and its
molecular formula was deduced as C20H16O5 from the analysis
of its NMR and HRMS data (m/z 359.0889 [M+Na]+, calcd for
C20H16O5Na 359.0890). UV data suggested the presence of an
isoflavonoid structure with a characteristic maximum at 266 nm
(Mabry and Markham, 1970). This hypothesis was confirmed in the
1H NMR spectrum of 1 (Table 1), with a typical singlet at dH 7.82
Fig. 1. Structure of derrisisoflavone G (1) with key HMBC (H ! C) correlations.
metabolite BC-1 dehydrate (Tahara et al., 1987). This optical
rotation value suggested a 200R configuration for 1.
90
91
2.2. Hemi-synthesis of compound 1
92
(1H, s, dC 152.0 by HSQC) due to a resonance of H-2. A singlet at dH
13.08 characterized a chelated 5-OH whilst two A2B2 doublets [dH
7.40 (2H, J = 8.5 Hz) and 6.91 (2H, J = 8.5 Hz)] could be associated to
a para-substituted B-ring. The H-6 singlet assignment [dH 6.35
(1H)] was deduced from a HMBC connectivity exhibited between
5-OH and C-6 (dC 94.4) (Fig. 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 also
None of the 2D NMR experiments recorded for 1 allowed us to
unambiguously determine the position of the prenyl appendage.
Therefore the hemisynthesis of this original secondary metabolite
was undertaken to confirm its structure. Our retrosynthetic
analysis highlighted that lupiwighteone (14) was a key interme-
diate. This derivative was prepared via a 4-step C-8 prenylation of
genistein (Al-Maharik and Botting, 2003). Starting from lupiwight-
eone (14), we then achieved a two-step sequence, photooxidation
of the prenyl side chain followed by reduction of the intermediate
hydroperoxide, leading to the secondary allylic alcohol appendage
(16) (Helesbeux et al., 2003). The last step consisted of
intramolecular Mitsunobu condensation of the secondary alcohol
function with the ortho-phenol group yielding the substituted
dihydrofuran ring. Different steps of this hemi-synthesis process
still need to be optimized. However, these reactions allowed us to
synthesize, as a racemic mixture, this original secondary metabo-
lite 1, isolated from D. ferruginea and therefore to confirm its
structure as 5-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7,8-(200-isoprenyldi-
hydrofurano)-4H-chromen-4-one. We eventually propose to name
it derrisisoflavone G.
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
exhibited resonances for two ethylenic protons (
and a methyl group [ H 1.78, (s, 3H)], whereas an ABX spin system
H 5.36 (dd, J = 7.3; 9.8 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (dd, J = 9.8; 14.6 Hz, 1H) and
d
H 4.97 and 5.11)
d
[
d
3.08 (dd, J = 7.3; 14.6 Hz, 1H)] was respectively associated with H-
200, H-300a and H-300b. of a dihydrofuran-ring. An isopropenylfuran
moiety derived from a classical prenyl cyclization was thus
identified in 1. The position of this 5-membered ring was then
deduced from the strong HMBC connectivities observed between
H-300a/H-300b and C-8 (
dC 102.8) on one hand and C-8a (dC 163.6) on
the other. This substitution pattern was eventually confirmed by a
NOESY experiment (Table 1). 1 appeared to be optically active with
[
a
]
ꢀ508 (c 0.4, MeOH, 20 8C). Based on a comparison with
D
structurally close compounds such as thonninginisoflavone
(Asomaning et al., 1995), licoagroisoflavone (Li et al., 2001),
lupinisoflavone A, dimethyl-lupinisoflavone A, trimethyl-luteone
2.3. Biological activities
113
Table 1
1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (500 MHz, CDCl3) of compound 1.
Crude extracts with four different solvents were tested for
antiparasitic, antioxidant and anti-AGEs activities. The high
antiparasitic potency of the cyclohexane extracts of the leaves
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
Position
d13
dH (J in Hz)
HMBCa
NOESYb
20
C
2
152.0
123.5
180.7
105.9
163.6
94.4
7.82, s
3, 4
10
3
(Plasmodium falciparum: 79.3% inhibition at 10
mg/mL; Leishmania
4
4a
5-OH
6
major: IC50 = 26 ꢁ 6 mg/mL) prompted us to identify the compounds
responsible for this activity. The value obtained for the anti-AGEs
activity (IC50 = 0.28 mg/mL) was also very interesting when com-
pared to the activity of reference compound, aminoguanidine
(IC50 = 1 mg/mL).
Compounds 2–5 showed strong antiparasitic activity against P.
falciparum and L. major according to former results (Batista and
Oliveira, 2009; Kayser et al., 2003). Nevertheless, contrary to
cajaflavanone (Morel et al., 2012), 2–5 exhibited strong cytotoxic-
ity against safe cell strains, as well as tumor cell strains
13.08, s
6.35, s
4a, 6
4a, 8
500, 600
7
166.4
102.8
163.6
123.1
130.4
115.5
155.8
87.9
8
8a
10
20, 60
30, 50
40
200
300
7.40, d (8.5)
6.91, d (8.5)
30, 40, 50
10, 40
2, 30, 50
20, 60
5.36, dd (7.3, 9.8)
3.08, dd (7.3, 14.6)
3.43, dd (9.8, 14.6)
500, 600
200, 8, 400
400, 8a
300
200
30.8
(IC50 < 13.3
mM) (Table 2), which led us to conclude that these
400
500
142.9
112.9
compounds have poor selectivity against the Plasmodium and
Leishmania strains tested. These results are in partial agreement
with those previously reported for lonchocarpol A (4) (Innok et al.,
2009) and 6,8-diprenyleriodictyol (5) (Omisore et al., 2005; Seo
et al., 1997). Alhough exhibiting antiparasitic activity slightly
lower than 2–5, the new isoflavone 1 appeared to be very
4.97, s
5.11, s
1.78, s
200, 600
200, 400
200, 400, 500
5-OH, 600
600
500
600
16.9
a
HMBC correlations (adjusted to 7.5 Hz) are from the specified proton(s) to the
indicated carbons.
b
NOESY correlations are from the specified proton(s) to indicated the proton(s).
Please cite this article in press as: Morel, S., et al., Anti-AGEs and antiparasitic activity of an original prenylated isoflavonoid and