G. Pa6e´ et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 4219–4222
4221
Supplementary Material
Analytical data for compounds 1, 2, 4–12 (this material
is available from the author) and description of crystal-
lographic methods. Further crystallographic data for
the structure 10 have been deposited with the Cam-
bridge Crystallographic Centre as supplementary publi-
cation number CCDC-205276. Copy of data can be
obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12
Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: (+44)-
1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Scheme 6.
zenesulfonyl chloride only the mono-sulfonamide 11b
was isolated (entry 2).
Acknowledgements
Such results enlighten the influence of the experimental
conditions on the behaviour of both amine centres
towards these reactions. But at the present time, no
explanation of this reactivity difference can be founded.
The authors thank the Ministe`re de la Jeunesse, de
l’Education Nationale et de la Recherche for a grant
(G.P.).
´
1
In order to prove the structure of compound 11, the H
References
NMR data of each compound could be consider.
Indeed, the H-11a signal of compound 10 (l=3.29
ppm) is very close to compounds 11 (l=3.39 ppm).
Moreover, the influence of the amide or sulphonyl
group on the primary amine involves a downfield shift
of one H-6 proton and one H-7 proton of compounds
11. Let us take for example, the case of the amide 11a.
H-6 protons of this compound represent two doublets
at l=3.83 and l=4.66 ppm. While for compound 10,
H-6 protons represent two doublet at l=3.31 and
l=3.64 ppm. The same analysis can be carried out for
the H-7 protons. Indeed, a H-7 proton of compound
11a is moved of l=1.80 ppm to l=2.59 ppm. These
observations indicate us that it is the primary amine
function which reacts under these condition. For sul-
fonamide 11b, the same remarks were observed.
1. (a) Podona, C.; Guardiola-Lemaˆıtre, B.; Caignard, D.-H.;
Adam, G.; Pfeiffer, B.; Renard, P.; Guillaumet, G. J. Med.
Chem. 1994, 37, 1779–1793; (b) Usse, S.; Pave´, G.; Guil-
laumet, G.; Viaud-Massuard, M.-C. Tetrahedron: Assym-
metry 2001, 12, 1689–1694; (c) Rezaie, R.; Joseph, B.;
Bremner, J. B.; Delagrange, P.; Kopp, C.; Misslin, R.;
Pfeiffer, B.; Renard, P.; Guillaumet, G. J. Pharm. Pharma-
col. 2001, 53, 959–968; (d) Comoy, C.; Marot, C.; Podona,
T.; Baudin, M.-L.; Morin-Allory, L.; Guillaumet, G.;
Pfeiffer, B.; Caignard, D.-H.; Renard, P.; Rettori, M.-C.;
Adam, G.; Guardiola-Lemaˆıtre, B. J. Med. Chem. 1996,
39, 4285–4298; (e) Usse, S.; Guillaumet, G.; Viaud, M. C.
J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 914–917; (f) Pave´, G.; Le´ger,
J.-M.; Jarry, C.; Viaud-Massuard, M.-C.; Guillaumet, G.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1401–1408.
2. Lucet, D.; Le Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 2580–2627 and references cited therein.
3. Husson, H.-P.; Royer, J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28,
383–394 and references cited therein.
4. Bonin, M.; Grierson, D. S.; Royer, J.; Husson, H.-P. Org.
Synth. 1992, 70, 54–58.
A reductive amination of amine 10 was although per-
formed. Benzaldehyde, molecular sieves, and sodium
cyanoborohydride were added in a solution of 10 in
methanol (Scheme 6). A separable mixture of mono-
and dialkylated compounds was obtained when 1 equiv.
of the aldehyde was used. On the other hand, when 2
equiv. of the reactant were used, only dialkylated
derivative 12 was generated in 89% yield.
5. Froelich, O.; Desos, P.; Bonin, M.; Quirion, J.-C.; Husson,
H.-P. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6700–6705.
1
6. Ratio determined by H NMR.
7. Typical procedure for imine reduction. Preparation of 9: to
a suspension of LiAlH4 (0.36 g, 9.6 mmol) at −10°C in
diethylether (30 mL), imine 7 (0.4 g, 1.2 mmol) was added
portionwise. After stirring for 18 h, the solution was
hydrolyzed by NaOH (1N, 0.4 mL) and water (1.2 mL).
The mixture was stirred again for 18 h and filtrated
through celite pad. After concentration, the residue was
purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2/MeOH
98:2) to furnish diaminoalcohol 9 as a white foam in 88%
yield (0.36 g).
8. Cutri, S.; Bonin, M.; Micouin, L.; Froelch, O.; Quirion,
J.-C.; Husson, H.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1179–
1182.
9. Diamine (−)-10. Colourless crystal. mp=74°C. MS: 219
(M+1)+, 202 (M−NH2)+; [h]D20=−151 (c 1.0, CHCl3). 1H
NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) (l, ppm; J, Hz): 1.31–1.87 (m,
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, synthesis of (6aR,11aS)-7,8,9,10,11,11a-
hexahydro-5-oxa-11-azacyclohepta[a]naphthalen-6a-
ylamine 10 was performed in four steps via the
CN(R,S) strategy in 41% overall yield, starting from
the 2-cyano-6-phenyloxazolopiperidine 3. The key step
involved an one-pot reduction and a ring-enlargement
process occurring in a highly regio- and stereoselective
way. The absolute configuration of diamine 10 was
unambiguously established by X-ray crystallography
(Fig. 2). A preliminary study of the reactivity of this
new diamine was realized.