C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Sequences and MALDI-TOF MS Characterization of Synthetic ODNs
1a. This research has been supported by Grants GM-29554 from
NIGMS, N00014-98-1-0093 from ONR, CHE-0079702, DMI-
0210844, EIA-0086015, DMR-01138790, and CTS-0103002 from
NSF, F30602-01-2-0561 from DARPA/AFSOR, and the NYU
Technology Transfer Fund.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characterization
of compounds 2-4 and all the ODNs (PDF). This material is available
References
Figure 3. Chemical structures of DNA/nylon conjugates.
(1) (a) Pearson, H. Nature 2003, 421, 312. (b) Dennis, C. Nature 2002, 418,
122. (c) Couzin, J. Science 2002, 298, 2296.
(2) Uhlmann, E.; Peyman, A. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 543.
(3) Nielsen, P. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 624.
(4) Barawkar, D. A.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10418.
(5) (a) Vester, B.; Lundberg, L. B.; Sørensen, M. D.; Babu, B. R.; Douthwaite,
S.; Wengel, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13682. (b) Demidov, V. V.
Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 4.
(6) (a) Santoro, S. W.; Joyce, G. F.; Sakthivel, K.; Gramatikova, S.; Barbas,
C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2433. (b) Thum, O.; Ja¨ger, S.;
Famulok, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3990. (c) Lermer, L.;
Roupioz, Y.; Ting, R.; Perrin, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9960.
(7) (a) Scho¨ning, K.-U.; Scholz, P.; Guntha, S.; Wu, X.; Krishnamurthy, R.;
Eschenmoser, A. Science 2000, 290, 1347. (b) Chaput, J. C.; Ichida, J.
K.; Szostak, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 856.
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF MS of 5 (a), and the coupled product 5C (b).
(8) Seeman, N. C. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 437.
(9) Seeman, N. C. Nature 2003, 421, 427.
(10) Winfree, E.; Liu, F.; Wenzler, L. A.; Seeman, N. C. Nature 1998, 394,
539.
(11) Li, X.; Zhan, Z.-Y. J.; Knipe, R.; Lynn, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 746.
(12) Zhu, L.; dos Santos, O.; Seeman, N. C.; Canary, J. W. Nucleotides
Nucleosides Nucleic Acids 2002, 21, 723.
(13) (a) Divakar, K. J.; Mottoh, A.; Reese, C. B.; Sanghvi, Y. S. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 969. (b) Ozaki, H.; Momiyama, S.; Yokotsuka,
K.; Sawai, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 677.
(14) Telser, J.; Cruickshank, K. A.; Morrison, L. E.; Netzel, T. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 6966.
(15) Berthod, T.; Pe´tillot, Y.; Guy, A.; Cadet, J.; Molko, D. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 6075.
(16) Avino, A. M.; Eritja, R. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1994, 13, 2059.
(17) (a) Pieles, U. Zu¨rcher, W.; Scha¨r, M.; Moser, H. E. Nucleic Acid Res.
1993, 21, 3191. (b). Li, Y. C. L.; Cheng, S.-W.; Chan, T.-W. D. Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 993.
(18) (a) Kunishima, M.; Kawachi, C.; Hioki, K.; Terao, K.; Tani, S. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 1551. (b) Liu, D. R.; Gartner, Z. J.; Kanan, M. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1796.
(19) (a) Schmidt, J. G.; Christensen, L.; Nielsen, P. E.; Orgel, L. E. Nucleic
Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4792. (b) Seitz, O.; Mattes, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 3178.
(20) (a) Sarracino, D.; Richert, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2543.
(b) Berggren, W. T.; Takova, T.; Olson, M. C.; Eis, P. S.; Kwiatkowski,
R. W.; Smith, L. M. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1745.
(21) These estimates are lower limits, as small amounts of sodium in the spectra
obscure and artificially inflate the starting material peak.
(22) In 5C, a less likely topological isomer is possible under these reaction
conditions. Control experiments were performed to study the distance
dependence of the coupling reaction between amino and carboxyl groups
separated by a spacer. Strands 5′-(dT)xUC(dT)nUN(dT)y (x + n + y ) 14,
n ) 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 10) were subjected to amide-bond promoting conditions.
It was found that the coupling yield was highly dependent upon the length
of the spacer (dT)n. When n g 2, the yield was less than 50%; when n )
6 or 10, coupled products were barely detectable. Therefore, the amide
bonds were biased to form between amino and carboxyl groups on adjacent
nucleotidyl residues.
ODN 1 was first subjected to amide-coupling conditions. Both
condensing agents DMT-MM18 and EDC19 proved effective in
promoting the intrastrand amide-forming reaction between UN and
UC under various buffer conditions. DMT-MM was preferred, as
it did not leave residual covalent adducts. The yield of the coupling
reaction was estimated by MALDI-TOF analysis.20 The yield of
ODN 1C from 1 was estimated to be more than 95%, whereas the
yield of 2C with three amide bonds was 78%, which also put the
single amide-bond forming yield over 95%.21 A control coupling
reaction using an ODN with regular T residues replacing UC in 2
showed no mass loss.
Isomers 3 and 4 were treated under coupling conditions to afford
ODNs with two amide bonds closing two fused 21-member rings
containing both a phosphodiester backbone and the newly formed
aliphatic carboxamide structure, as characterized by MALDI-TOF
MS (Table 1). The condensation of ODN 5 yielded three amide
bonds to form 5c (Figures 3 and 4) with three fused 21-member
rings.22 Structures of several of the product strands are indicated
in Figure 3. The linear polyamide backbone is essentially Nylon-
5,7.
The foregoing results should be extensible using additional bases
to more complex systems in which the self-assembling properties
of DNA can be exploited. Aside from obvious applications in the
antisense and gene therapy areas, we anticipate significant utility
in nanotechnology.
Acknowledgment. We thank Loraine Foley for performing
ODN synthesis and Osvaldo dos Santos for synthesizing compound
JA035186R
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 34, 2003 10179