Synthesis of Fused Polycycles
instead of DMF as the solvent, in which cesium pivalate
is not completely soluble. Under these conditions, we
obtained the desired compound 2 in a relatively low 59%
yield, along with the reduced product 3 in a 17% yield
(entry 16). Twenty four percent of the starting vinylic
iodide 1 was also obtained. Finally, to test whether dppm
was indeed critical to this reaction, we carried out the
transformation using another chelating phosphine ligand,
namely 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), and we
obtained compound 2 in a 90% yield, along with reduced
product 3 in a 10% yield (entry 17).
FIGURE 1. Unfavorable seven-membered-ring palladacycle
intermediates.
chlorophenoxy)-2-iodobiphenyl (8) under our standard
conditions, while leaving the chloro functionality intact
(entry 3).
As a result of this optimization work, our optimal set
of reaction conditions for this transformation are those
listed in entry 15 of Table 1. Notice that the newly
developed reaction conditions catalyze the transformation
of 1 to 2 in high yield and much shorter reaction time
than our earlier reported procedure (entry 1).3b The
variable most critical to the success of this process
appears to be the highly soluble cesium pivalate base.
Surprisingly, the use of n-Bu4NOAc as the base, which
is also completely soluble in DMF under reaction condi-
tions identical with those described in entry 15, failed to
promote this reaction, affording only trace amounts of
the desired product 2 after 1 d (entry 18). Thus, not only
the solubility, but also the exact nature of the base
appears critical in determining the yield of fluorene. It
is interesting to note that the work of Buchwald, Hartwig,
and Fu has demonstrated that steric congestion imposed
on palladium by bulky, electron-rich ligands facilitates
both the oxidative addition and reductive elimination
steps involving palladium, and gives rise to more effective
catalyst systems.8 However, nothing is apparently known
about the effects of using a sterically hindered base, such
as pivalate, in palladium chemistry, and whether it may
give similar results to those obtained with bulky ligands.
With an apparently “optimal” set of reaction conditions
for palladium migration chemistry at our disposal, we
proceeded to study the sequential Pd-catalyzed migration/
arylation of various 3′-substituted 2-iodobiphenyls (Table
2). We began by allowing 3′-benzyl-2-iodobiphenyl (4) to
react under our standard reaction conditions at 100 °C,
but after 2 d this substrate failed to react. However, by
simply increasing the reaction temperature to 110 °C,
we were able to obtain the desired compound 5 in a 40%
yield (entry 1). The disappointingly low yield obtained
with this substrate might be explained by the poor
reactivity of the benzyl moiety as an intramolecular trap.
To test this idea, we carried out the reaction with the
more electron-rich 2-iodo-3′-phenoxybiphenyl (6) and
obtained the desired 4-phenyldibenzofuran (7) in an
impressive 89% yield (entry 2). Clearly, these results
indicate that the electron-rich oxygen-substituted phenyl
ring is superior as an arene trap. Our finding that
electron-rich arenes are superior to electron-neutral
arene traps is consistent with literature reports indicat-
ing that the ease of C-H activation by palladium
parallels electrophilic aromatic substitution.9 Similarly,
we have been able to selectively obtain 3-chloro-5-
phenyldibenzofuran (9) in an 82% yield from 3-(p-
Motivated by the ease of preparation of the following
starting materials and by the knowledge that electron-
rich arenes are apparently superior as intramolecular
traps for our arylpalladium intermediates, we synthe-
sized the indole derivatives 10 and 12. To our great
satisfaction, compound 10 smoothly underwent the de-
sired reaction, producing the relatively strained isoindo-
loindole 11 in a 70% yield (entry 4). Surprisingly,
compound 12 produced the strained and sterically con-
gested 2-methylisoindoloindole 13 in a comparable 71%
yield (entry 5).
We next examined the possibility of using an intramo-
lecular arylation to form six-membered rings. Unfortu-
nately, 3-(2-iodophenyl)benzyl phenyl ether (14) failed to
react under our standard reaction conditions. Even at 110
°C, the reaction was sluggish, so the temperature was
increased to 120 °C, in which case the reaction was
complete after 2 d. Unfortunately, an inseparable 60:40
mixture of the desired compound 15 and the reduced
product 16 was obtained in a 75% overall yield (entry 6).
Clearly, the formation of a six-membered ring is not as
favorable as five-membered ring formation (compare
entries 2 and 6). This might be due to the difficulty in
forming a seven-membered-ring palladacycle (Figure 1).
We proceeded to investigate the sequential migration/
arylation reaction of more complex polyaromatic com-
pounds. In theory, 2-iodo-1-phenylnaphthalene (17) should
afford fluoranthene (18) using our methodology. Mecha-
nistically, the palladium must first undergo a 1,4-
palladium migration from the 2-position of the naphtha-
lene to the ortho position of the phenyl substituent,
followed by arylation at the 8-position of the naphthalene
(Scheme 3). Although the reaction did not proceed at 100
°C, at 110 °C compound 17 produced the desired com-
pound 18 in an 81% yield (entry 7). Similarly, 2-bromo-
1-phenylnaphthalene (19) produced the desired fluoran-
thene (18) in a 70% yield, indicating that this aryl
bromide also undergoes the desired transformation, but
in a somewhat lower yield and a longer reaction time.
Another interesting example of this migration/aryla-
tion chemistry involves the rearrangement of easily pre-
pared 9-iodo-10-arylphenanthrenes10 to benz[e]acephen-
anthrylenes (entries 9-12). In this case, the palladium
migrates from the 9-position of the phenanthrene to the
ortho position of the aryl substituent, followed by cy-
(9) For mechanistic studies suggesting electrophilic species in
intramolecular C-H activation processes employing palladium, see:
(a) Martin-Matute, B.; Mateo, C.; Cardenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M.
Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 2341 and references therein. (b) Catellani, M.;
Chiusoli, G. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 425, 151 and references
therein.
(8) (a) Old, D. W.; Harris, M. C.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
1403. (b) Mann, G.; Incarvito, C.; Rheingold, A. L.; Hartwig, J. F. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3224. (c) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6989.
(10) Yao, T.; Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2677.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 24, 2004 8253